Vol. 23 Núm. 1 (2025): Revista fuentes
Artículos

Modelación del intercambio de energía radiante a través de una mezcla gaseosa de H2O, CO2 y CO

yanan Camaraza-Medina
University of Guanajuato

Publicado 2025-06-30

Palabras clave

  • mezcla de gases,
  • emisividad,
  • absortividad,
  • radiación térmica

Cómo citar

Camaraza-Medina, yanan. (2025). Modelación del intercambio de energía radiante a través de una mezcla gaseosa de H2O, CO2 y CO. Revista Fuentes, El Reventón Energético, 23(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.18273/revfue.v23n1-2025003

Resumen

En este trabajo, se presenta una solución analítica para calcular las emisividades y absortividades de gases para mezclas H2O -CO2 - CO, válida para temperaturas de 300 a 2700 K y longitud de trayectoria de presión de 0.06 a 40 atm∙m. En el cálculo de la solución analítica (AS) se implementaron los procedimientos no lineales de los métodos de Galerkin y Ritz, basados en la solución residual de las raíces diferenciales mediante el Método de los Elementos Finitos (MEF). Para cada combinación (P_x L ;T), implementando el AS, se determinaron la absortividad espectral a_λ y la emisividad ε_λ, mientras que la emisividad media ε_m y la absortividad〖 a〗_m de la mezcla de gases se calcularon utilizando el HGM y el método propuesto. En los cálculos de emisividad, el HGM muestra un menor ajuste, con valores de ±15% y ±20% para el 56,2% y 79,1% de los puntos PL ;T evaluados, mientras que; el modelo propuesto se correlaciona adecuadamente con los datos disponibles, mostrando una desviación promedio de ±10% y ±15% para el 76,2% y el 91,4% de los puntos PL ;T evaluados. En las estimaciones de absortividad, el HGM muestra un ajuste más débil, con valores de ±15% y ±20% para el 51,4% y el 77,3% de los puntos PL ;T evaluados, respectivamente, mientras que; el modelo propuesto muestra buena concordancia con los datos disponibles, con una desviación media de ±10% y ±15% para el 74,1% y el 89,8% de los puntos PL ;T evaluados. En todos los casos, la concordancia del modelo propuesto con los datos experimentales disponibles es lo suficientemente buena como para considerarse satisfactoria para el diseño práctico.

 

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

  1. Alberti, M., Weber, R., & Mancini, M. (2016). Re-creating Hottel’s emissivity charts for water vapor and extending them to 40 bar pressure using HITEMP-2010 data base. Combustion and flame, 169, 141-153. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.04.013
  2. Avalos-Patiño, J. E., Dargaville, S., Neethling, S. J., & Piggott, M. D. (2021). Impact of inhomogeneous unsteady participating media in a coupled convection–radiation system using finite element based methods. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 176, 121452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121452
  3. Bordbar, M. H., Węcel, G., &Hyppänen, T. (2014). A line by line based weighted sum of gray gases model for inhomogeneous CO2–H2O mixture in oxy-fired combustion. Combustion and flame, 161(9), 2435-2445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.03.013
  4. Camaraza‐Medina, Y. (2024a). Gas emissivities and absorptivities for H2O–CO2–CO mixtures. Heat Transfer, 53(6), 3179-3194.https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.23081
  5. Camaraza‐Medina, Y. (2024b). Radiative heat transfer in H2O and CO2 mixtures. Ingenius, Revista de Ciencia y Tecnología, 32, 36-47. https://doi.org/10.17163/ings.n32.2024.04
  6. Camaraza‐Medina, Y., Hernandez‐Guerrero, A., & Luviano‐Ortiz, J.L. (2024a).Radiant energy exchange through participating media composed of arbitrary concentrations of H2O, CO2 and CO. Heat Transfer, 53(4), 2073-2094.https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.23026
  7. Camaraza‐Medina, Y., Hernandez‐Guerrero, A., & Luviano‐Ortiz, J.L. (2024b). Contour integration for the view factor calculation between two rectangular surfaces. Heat Transfer, 53(1), 225-243. https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.22950
  8. Camaraza-Medina, Y. (2021) Methods for the determination of the heat transfer coefficient in air cooled condenser used at biomass power plants, International Journal of Heat and Technology, 39(5), 1443-1450. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijht.390505
  9. Camaraza-Medina, Y., Hernandez-Guerrero, A., & Luviano-Ortiz, J. L. (2023). View factor for radiative heat transfer calculations between triangular geometries with common edge. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 148(10), 4523-4539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-11975-y
  10. Cassol, F., Brittes, R., França, F. H., &Ezekoye, O. A. (2014). Application of the weighted- sum-of-gray-gases model for media composed
  11. of arbitrary concentrations of H2O, CO2 and soot. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 79, 796-806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.08.032
  12. Chandrakar, V., Mukherjee, A., & Senapati, J. R. (2022). Free convection heat transfer with surface radiation from infrared suppression system and estimation of cooling time. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 33, 101369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101369
  13. Cui, M., Gao, X., & Chen, H. (2011). Inverse radiation analysis in an absorbing, emitting and non-gray participating medium. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 50(6), 898-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2011.01.018
  14. Dorigon, L. J., Duciak, G., Brittes, R., Cassol, F., Galarça, M., & França, F. H. (2013). WSGG correlations based on HITEMP2010 for computation of thermal radiation in non-isothermal, non-homogeneous H2O/CO2 mixtures. International Journal of Heat
  15. and Mass Transfer, 64, 863-873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.05.010
  16. Farmer, J., & Roy, S. (2020). A quasi-Monte Carlo solver for thermal radiation in participating media. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 242, 106753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.106753
  17. Gao, B. H., Qi, H., Sun, A. T., Shi, J. W., & Ren, Y. T. (2020). Effective solution of three-dimensional inverse radiation problem in participating medium based on RDFIEM. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 156, 106462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
  18. ijthermalsci.2020.106462
  19. Gao, B. H., Qi, H., Shi, J. W., Zhang, J. Q., Ren, Y. T., & He, M. J. (2022). An equation-solving method based on radiation distribution factor for radiative transfer in participating media with diffuse boundaries. Results in Physics, 36, 105418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105418
  20. Gümüşsu, E., & Tarman, H. I. (2023). Numerical Simulation of Duct Flow in the Presence of Participating Media Radiation with Total
  21. Energy Based Entropic Lattice Boltzmann Method. International Journal of Thermofluids, 20, 100516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100516
  22. Khivsara, S., Reddy, M. U. M., Reddy, K. P. J., & Dutta, P. (2019). Measurement of radiation heat transfer in supercritical carbon dioxide
  23. medium. Measurement, 139, 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.03.012
  24. Li, T., Lin, X., Yuan, Y., Liu, D., Shuai, Y., & Tan, H. (2022). Effects of flame temperature and radiation properties on infrared light field imaging. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 36, 102215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.102215
  25. Li, S., Sun, Y., Ma, J., & Zhou, R. (2023). Angular- spatial discontinuous Galerkin method for radiative heat transfer with a participating medium in complex three-dimensional geometries. International Communications in Heat and MassTra nsfer, 145, 106836.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.106836
  26. Liu, X., Kelm, S., Kampili, M., Kumar, G. V., &Allelein, H. J. (2022). Monte Carlo method with SNBCK nongray gas model for thermal radiation in containment flows. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 390, 111689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.111689
  27. Modest, M. F., & Riazzi, R. J. (2005). Assembly of full-spectrum k-distributions from a narrow-band database; effects of mixing gases, gases and nongray absorbing particles, and mixtures with nongray scatterers in nongray enclosures. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 90(2), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2004.03.007
  28. Moore, T. J., & Jones, M. R. (2014). Analysis of the conduction–radiation problem in absorbing, emitting, non-gray planar media using an exact method. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 73, 804-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.02.029
  29. Mukherjee, A., Chandrakar, V., & Senapati, J. R. (2023). New correlations for infrared suppression devices having louvered diabatic tubes with surface radiation. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 44, 102011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2023.102011
  30. Sadeghi, P., & Safavinejad, A. (2017). Radiative entropy generation in a gray absorbing, emitting, and scattering planar medium at radiative equilibrium. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 201, 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.06.023
  31. Sun, S. (2021). Simultaneous reconstruction of thermal boundary condition and physical properties of participating medium. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 163, 106853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2021.106853
  32. Wang, Y., Sergent, A., Saury, D., Lemonnier, D., & Joubert, P. (2020). Numerical study of an unsteady confined thermal plume under the influence of gas radiation. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 156, 106474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106474
  33. Zhang, Z., Doner, N., Long, Y., & Lou, C. (2023). Entropy and exergy analysis of coupled radiative heat transfer and heat conduction: A new thermodynamics approach. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 215, 124485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124485