Vol. 38 Núm. 3 (2025): Revista ION
Artículos

Educación ambiental y gestión de residuos sólidos en instituciones educativas: Una revisión interdisciplinaria

PDF
  • Sheila Sierralta Pinedo,
  • William Robert Gordillo Gonzales,
  • Christian David Corrales Otazú,
  • Sarita Jessica Apaza Miranda
Sheila Sierralta Pinedo
Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego, Perú
William Robert Gordillo Gonzales
Universidad Tecnológica del Perú, Perú
Christian David Corrales Otazú
Universidad Católica de Santa María, Perú
Sarita Jessica Apaza Miranda
Universidad Continental sede Arequipa, Perú
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18273/revion.v38n3-2025004

Publicado 2026-05-13

Palabras clave

  • Conciencia Ecológica,
  • Tecnologías Digitales,
  • Cumplimiento Normativo,
  • Sostenibilidad Institucional,
  • Ingeniería Química,
  • Política Educativa,
  • Interdisciplinariedad,
  • Reciclaje Estudiantil
    • ...Más
    Menos

Cómo citar

Sierralta Pinedo, S., Gordillo Gonzales, W. R., Corrales Otazú, C. D., & Apaza Miranda, S. J. (2026). Educación ambiental y gestión de residuos sólidos en instituciones educativas: Una revisión interdisciplinaria. Revista ION, 38(3), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.18273/revion.v38n3-2025004

Derechos de autor 2025 Sheila Sierralta Pinedo, William Robert Gordillo Gonzales, Christian David Corrales Otazú, Sarita Jessica Apaza Miranda

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Resumen

Esta revisión sistemática examina la interacción entre educación ambiental y gestión de residuos sólidos en instituciones educativas, incorporando perspectivas de ingeniería química, derecho ambiental y tecnologías digitales. Se analizaron cincuenta estudios académicos publicados entre 2012 y 2024, seleccionados mediante criterios PRISMA en cinco bases de datos científicas. Los hallazgos revelan que los programas educativos ambientales mejoran la segregación de residuos y la conciencia estudiantil. No obstante, persisten deficiencias en la aplicación normativa y limitada incorporación tecnológica. Las intervenciones más efectivas integran componentes formativos, técnicos y digitales de manera sostenida. En consecuencia, se propone un marco interdisciplinario para fortalecer la gestión ambiental sostenible en el sector educativo, enfatizando la necesidad de políticas que reconozcan la complejidad del problema ambiental y promuevan intervenciones escalables y evaluables.

PDF

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

  1. [1] Tamay Felipa W, More López J, Yovera Saldarriaga J, Rodríguez Espinoza R, Sánchez Moreno D, Ipanaqué Roña J, et al. Environmental Education and its relationship with Solid Waste in the High School Miguel Grau from the Paramonga district. J. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021;5(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.32829/EESJ.V5I1.212
  2. [2] Abarca-Guerrero L, Maas G, Hogland W. Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Manag. 2013;33(1):220-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.008
  3. [3] Kollmuss A, Agyeman J. Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ. Educ. Res. 2002;8(3):239-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
  4. [4] Adeniran AE, Nubi AT, Adelopo AO. Solid waste generation and characterization in the University of Lagos for a sustainable waste management. Waste Manag. 2017;67:3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.002
  5. [5] Stern MJ, Powell RB, Hill D. Environmental education program evaluation in the new millennium: What do we measure and what have we learned? Environ. Educ. Res. 2014;20(5):581-611. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.838749
  6. [6] Monroe MC, Plate RR, Oxarart A, Bowers A, Chaves WA. Identifying effective climate change education strategies: A systematic review of the research. Environ. Educ. Res. 2019;25(6):791-812. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842
  7. [7] Ardoin NM, Bowers AW, Roth NW, Holthuis N. Environmental education and K-12 student outcomes: A review and analysis of research. J. Environ. Educ. 2018;49(1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1366155
  8. [8] Altin A, Tecer S, Tecer L, Altin S, Kahraman BF. Environmental Awareness Level of Secondary School Students: A Case Study in Balıkesir (Türkiye). Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014;141:1208-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.207
  9. [9] Pe’er S, Goldman D, Yavetz B. Environmental Literacy in Teacher Training: Attitudes, Knowledge, and Environmental Behavior of Beginning Students. J. Environ. Educ. 2007;39(1):45-59. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.39.1.45-59
  10. [10] Tilbury D. Education for sustainable development: An expert review of processes and learning. Paris: UNESCO; 2011. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000191442
  11. [11] Tchobanoglous G, Kreith F. Handbook of solid waste management. 2 ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2002.
  12. [12] Vergara SE, Tchobanoglous G. Municipal Solid Waste and the Environment: A Global Perspective. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2012;37:277-309. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-050511-122532
  13. [13] Lozano R, Lukman R, Lozano FJ, Huisingh D, Lambrechts W. Declarations for sustainability in higher education: Becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system. J. Clean. Prod. 2013;48:10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.006
  14. [14] Vare P, Scott W. Learning for a Change: Exploring the Relationship Between Education and Sustainable Development. J. Educ. Sustain. Dev. 2007;1(2):191-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/097340820700100209
  15. [15] Agbedahin AV. Sustainable development, Education for Sustainable Development, and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Emergence, efficacy, eminence, and future. Sustain. Dev. 2019;27(4):669-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1931
  16. [16] Kopnina HN. Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): The turn away from ‘environment’ in environmental education? Environ. Educ. Res. 2012;18(5):699-717. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.658028
  17. [17] Kalsoom Q, Qureshi N, Khanam A. Perceptions of the research scholars regarding education for sustainable development (ESD) in Pakistan. In: Leal Filho W, Rogers J, Iyer-Raniga U. (Eds) Sustainable Development Research in the Asia-Pacific Region. Cham: Springer Nature; 2018. p. 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73293-0_10
  18. [18] Leal Filho W, Raath S, Lazzarini B, Vargas VR, de Souza L, Anholon R, et al. The role of transformation in learning and education for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2018;199:286-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.017
  19. [19] UNESCO. Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. Paris: UNESCO; 2017. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444
  20. [20] Sterling S, Maxey L, Luna H. The sustainable university: Progress and prospects. London: Routledge; 2013.
  21. [21] Tuncer G, Tekkaya C, Sungur S, Cakiroglu J, Ertepinar H, Kaplowitz M. Assessing preservice teachers’ environmental literacy in Turkey as a mean to develop teacher education programs. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 2009;29(4):426-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.10.003
  22. [22] Adomßent M, Fischer D, Godemann J, Herzig C, Otte I, Rieckmann M, et al. Emerging areas in research on higher education for sustainable development-management education, sustainable consumption and perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe. J. Clean. Prod. 2014;62:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.045
  23. [23] Sinakou E, Boeve-de Pauw J, Goossens M, Van Petegem P. Academics in the field of Education for Sustainable Development: Their conceptions of sustainable development. J. Clean. Prod. 2018;184:321-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.279
  24. [24] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  25. [25] Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 2015;4:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
  26. [26] United Nations. The future we want: Outcome document of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. Rio de Janeiro: UN; 2012. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/rio20-outcome-document-future-we-want
  27. [27] Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2 ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
  28. [28] Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
  29. [29] Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008
  30. [30] Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. Lancaster: Lancaster University; 2006.
  31. [31] Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J. An introduction to systematic reviews. 2 ed. London: Sage; 2017.
  32. [32] Schultz PW, Bator RJ, Large LB, Bruni CM, Tabanico JJ. Littering in context: Personal and environmental predictors of littering behavior. Environ. Behav. 2013;45(1):35-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511412179
  33. [33] Ramsey CE, Rickson RE. Environmental Knowledge and Attitudes. J. Environ. Educ. 1976;8(1):10-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1976.9941552
  34. [34] Hungerford HR, Volk TL. Changing Learner Behavior Through Environmental Education. J. Environ. Educ. 1990;21(3):8-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1990.10753743
  35. [35] Zelezny LC. Educational Interventions That Improve Environmental Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis. J. Environ. Educ. 1999;31(1):5-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969909598627
  36. [36] Agurto Marchena FJ, Granda Cruz LE, Casaverde Pacherrez LA, Donayre Monteza FA. Artificial Intelligence-Powered Solid Waste Detection System. En: 4th LACCEI International Multiconference on Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Regional Development; 2024 dic 2-4; Virtual Edition. Boca Raton: LACCEI; 2024. https://doi.org/10.18687/LEIRD2024.1.1.669
  37. [37] Borojeni GP, Abdi A. IoT-WMS: Design and implementation of an IoT-based smart waste management system. In: Proceedings of the 2024 8th International Conference on Smart Cities, Internet of Things and Applications (SCIoT 2024), Mashhad, Iran, 2024. p. 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCIoT62588.2024.10570110
  38. [38] Medina-Arboleda IF, Páramo P. La educación ambiental y para el cambio climático en Latinoamérica: una revisión de alcance. Suma Psicol. 2024;31(1):63-93. https://doi.org/10.14349/sumapsi.2024.v31.n1.8
  39. [39] Debrah JK, Vidal DG, Dinis MAP. Raising Awareness on Solid Waste Management through Formal Education for Sustainability: A Developing Countries Evidence Review. Recycling. 2021;6(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling6010006
  40. [40] Ojala M. Regulating worry, promoting inclined abstention, and implying concentration: How do parents discuss climate change with their children. J. Environ. Psychol. 2012;32(3):251-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.004
  41. [41] Chawla L, Cushing DF. Education for strategic environmental behavior. Environ. Educ. Res. 2007;13(4):437-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701581539
  42. [42] Jacobi PR, Besen GR. Gestão de resíduos sólidos em São Paulo: Desafios da sustentabilidade. Estud Av. 2011;25(71):135-58. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142011000100010
  43. [43] Andrade MZSS. Educação ambiental e gestão integrada de resíduos sólidos: proposta de um plano de gerenciamento de resíduos em uma instituição de ensino da cidade de Esperança/PB [Dissertação de Mestrado]. Campina Grande: Universidade Federal de Campina Grande; 2018. https://dspace.sti.ufcg.edu.br/handle/riufcg/5063
  44. [44] Berenguer J, Corraliza JA, Martín R. Rural-Urban Differences in Environmental Concern, Attitudes, and Actions. Eur. J. Psychol Assess. 2005;21(2):128-38. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.128
  45. [45] Robertson A, Walkington H. Developing professional practice through internships: Student teacher experiences of working in enterprise contexts. J. Geogr. High Educ. 2009;33(3):391-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830902812982
  46. [46] Sadler TD, Barab SA, Scott B. What Do Students Gain by Engaging in Socioscientific Inquiry? Res. Sci. Educ. 2007;37(4):371-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
  47. [47] Summers M, Corney G, Childs A. Student teachers’ conceptions of sustainable development: The starting-points of geographers and scientists. Educ. Res. 2004;46(2):163-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188042000222449
  48. [48] Esa N. Environmental knowledge, attitude and practices of student teachers. IRGEE. 2010;19(1):42-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382040903545534
  49. [49] Giusti L. A review of waste management practices and their impact on human health. Waste Manag. 2009;29(8):2227-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.028
  50. [50] Hoornweg D, Bhada-Tata P. What a Waste?: A Global Review of Solid Waste Management. Washington DC: World Bank; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1596/17388
  51. [51] Karak T, Bhagat RM, Bhattacharyya P. Municipal Solid Waste Generation, Composition, and Management: The World Scenario. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012;42(15):1509-630. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2011.569871
  52. [52] Miezah K, Obiri-Danso K, Kádár Z, Fei-Baffoe B, Mensah MY. Municipal solid waste characterization and quantification as a measure towards effective waste management in Ghana. Waste Manag. 2015;46:15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.09.009
  53. [53] Al-Khatib IA, Monou M, Abu Zahra AS, Shaheen HQ, Kassinos D. Solid waste characterization, quantification and management practices in developing countries: A case study - Nablus district, Palestine. J. Environ. Manag. 2010;91(5):1131-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.01.003
  54. [54] Sanchez Alean AR, Espitia Lozano MR, Tovar Rua DC. El compostaje como estrategia pedagógica: Una mirada desde la Educación Ambiental. Cienc. Lat. Rev. Cient. Multidiscip. 2023;7(2):4568-88. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i2.5671
  55. [55] Diaz LF, Savage GM, Eggerth LL, Golueke CG. Composting and Recycling Municipal Solid Waste. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1993. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315150444
  56. [56] Papadopoulos AE, Styliaras GD, Michalopoulos NM. Municipal solid waste management scenarios for Attica and their greenhouse gas emission impact. Waste Manag. Res. 2009;27(9):928-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X09350787
  57. [57] Zhu D, Asnani PU, Zurbrügg C, Anapolsky S, Mani S. Improving municipal solid waste management in India: A sourcebook for policymakers and practitioners. Washington DC: World Bank; 2008. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7361-3
  58. [58] Medina M. Scavenger cooperatives in Asia and Latin America. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2000;31(1):54-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00071-9
  59. [59] Dahlén L, Vukicevic S, Meijer JE, Lagerkvist A. Comparison of different collection systems for sorted household waste in Sweden. Waste Manag. 2007;27(10):1298-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.06.016
  60. [60] Wilson DC, Rodic L, Scheinberg A, Velis CA, Alabaster G. Comparative analysis of solid waste management in 20 cities. Waste Manag. Res. 2012;30(3):237-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X12437569
  61. [61] Troschinetz AM, Mihelcic JR. Sustainable recycling of municipal solid waste in developing countries. Waste Manag. 2009;29(2):915-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.04.016
  62. [62] Daskalopoulos E, Badr O, Probert SD. An integrated approach to municipal solid waste management. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 1998;24(1):33-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(98)00031-7
  63. [63] Lohri CR, Camenzind EJ, Zurbrügg C. Financial sustainability in municipal solid waste management - Costs and revenues in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. Waste Manag. 2014;34(2):542-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.014
  64. [64] Pichtel J. Waste management practices: Municipal, hazardous, and industrial. 2 ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2014.
  65. [65] Pongrácz E, Pohjola VJ. Re-defining waste, the concept of ownership and the role of waste management. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2004;40(2):141-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(03)00057-0
  66. [66] Cointreau S. Environmental management of urban solid wastes in developing countries: A project guide. Washington DC: World Bank; 1982. https://www.ircwash.org/sites/default/files/Cointreau-1982-Environmental.pdf
  67. [67] Shekdar AV. Sustainable solid waste management: An integrated approach for Asian countries. Waste Manag. 2009;29(4):1438-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.08.025
  68. [68] Parizeau K, Massow M, Martin R. Household-level dynamics of food waste production and related beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours in Guelph, Ontario. Waste Manag. 2015;35:207-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.019
  69. [69] Khajuria A, Yamamoto Y, Morioka T. Estimation of municipal solid waste generation and landfill area in Asian developing countries J. Environ. Biol. 2010;31:649-54.
  70. [70] Agamuthu P, Fauziah SH, Khidzir KM. Evolution of solid waste management in Malaysia: Impacts and implications of the solid waste bill, 2007. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2009;11(2):99-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-008-0231-3
  71. [71] Asase M, Yanful EK, Mensah M, Stanford J, Amponsah S. Comparison of municipal solid waste management systems in Canada and Ghana: A case study of the cities of London, Ontario, and Kumasi, Ghana. Waste Manag. 2009;29(10):2779-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.06.019
  72. [72] Marshall RE, Farahbakhsh K. Systems approaches to integrated solid waste management in developing countries. Waste Manag. 2013;33(4):988-1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.12.023
  73. [73] Vergara SE, Silver WL. Greenhouse gas emissions from windrow composting of organic wastes: Patterns and emissions factors. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019;14(12):124027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5262
  74. [74] O’Ryan R, Ibarra C. Environmental Policy in Latin America. In: Farazmand A. (eds). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2670-1
  75. [75] Ferreira JA, Anjos LA. Aspectos de saúde coletiva e ocupacional associados à gestão dos resíduos sólidos municipais. Cad. Saúde Pública. 2001;17(3):689-96. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2001000300023
  76. [76] Sauvé L. Environmental education and sustainable development: A further appraisal. Can. J. Environ. Educ. 1996;1:7-34.
  77. [77] Reid A, Jensen BB, Nikel J, Simovska V. Participation and Learning: Perspectives on Education and the Environment, Health and Sustainability. London: Springer; 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6416-6
  78. [78] Cotton D, Winter J. ‘It’s Not Just Bits of Paper and Light Bulbs’: A Review of Sustainability Pedagogies and Their Potential for Use in Higher Education. In: Jones P, Selby D, Sterling S, editors. Sustainability Education: Perspectives and practice across higher education. London: Earthscan; 2010. p. 42-54.
  79. [79] Wynes S, Nicholas KA. The climate mitigation gap: Education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017;12(7):074024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541
  80. [80] Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, Nacke L. From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. En: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference; 2011 Sep 28-30; Tampere, Finland. New York: ACM; 2011. p. 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
  81. [81] Hamari J, Koivisto J, Sarsa H. Does Gamification Work? A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification. En: Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; 2014 Jan 6-9; Waikoloa, USA. Washington DC: IEEE; 2014. p. 3025-34. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
  82. [82] Selwyn N. Education and technology: Key issues and debates. 2 ed. London: Bloomsbury; 2017. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474235952
  83. [83] Warschauer M, Matuchniak T. New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Rev. Res. Educ. 2010;34(1):179-225. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09349791
  84. [84] Dicheva D, Dichev C, Agre G, Angelova G. Gamification in Education: A Systematic Mapping Study. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2015;18(3):78-88.
  85. [85] Domínguez A, Saenz-de-Navarrete J, de-Marcos L, Fernández-Sanz L, Pagés C, Martínez-Herráiz JJ. Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Comput. Educ. 2013;63:380-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020
  86. [86] Seaborn K, Fels DI. Gamification in theory and action: A survey. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2015;74:14-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006
  87. [87] Wenger-Trayner E, McDermott RA, Snyder W. Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business Press; 2002.
  88. [88] Selwyn N. Is Technology Good For Education? Cambridge: Polity Press; 2016.
  89. [89] Livingstone S. Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxf. Rev. Educ. 2012;38(1):9-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.577938
  90. [90] Van Dijk JAGM. The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2005. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229812
  91. [91] Arduino Community. Arduino for education: Open source hardware and software (sitio en Internet). Disponible en: https://www.arduino.cc/en/education. Acceso el 15 de marzo 2024.
  92. [92] Blikstein P. Digital Fabrication and ‘Making’ in Education: The Democratization of Invention. In: Walter-Herrmann J, Büching C, editors. FabLabs: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors. Bielefeld: Transcript Publishers; 2013. p. 203-22. https://doi.org/10.1515/transcript.9783839423820.203
  93. [93] Peppler K, Halverson E, Kafai YB. Makeology: Makerspaces as Learning Environments. New York: Routledge; 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726519
  94. [94] Jensen BB, Schnack K. The action competence approach in environmental education. Environ. Educ. Res. 1997;3(2):163-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462970030205
  95. [95] Mogensen F, Schnack K. The action competence approach and the ‘new’ discourses of education for sustainable development, competence and quality criteria. Environ. Educ. Res. 2010;16(1):59-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903504032
  96. [96] Breiting S, Mayer M, Mogensen F. Quality Criteria for ESD-Schools: Guidelines to enhance the quality of education for sustainable development. Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Culture.
  97. [97] Reid A. Researching Environmental and Sustainability Education Policy: Slumbers and Awakenings. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 54: 838-865. (2020) https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12474
  98. [98] Hart RA. Children’s Participation: The Theory and Practice of Involving Young Citizens in Community Development and Environmental Care. London: Earthscan; 1997.
  99. [99] Checkoway B, Richards-Schuster K. Youth Participation in Community Evaluation Research. Am. J. Eval. 2003;24(1):21-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400302400103
  100. [100]Percy-Smith B, Thomas N. A Handbook of Children and Young People’s Participation: Perspectives from Theory and Practice. London: Routledge; 2010. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203871072
  101. [101]Kemmis S, McTaggart R, Nixon R. The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Singapore: Springer; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
  102. [102]Brydon-Miller M, Greenwood D, Maguire P. Why Action Research? Action Res. 2003;1(1):9-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503030011002
  103. [103]Pfeffer J, Salancik GR. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2003. https://share.google/ucocFk9oQlQeurAjI
  104. [104]Manetti G. The quality of stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: empirical evidence and critical points. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Mgmt. 2011;18(2):110-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.255
  105. [105] Leal Filho W, Brandli L, Castro P, Newman J. Handbook of Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development in Higher Education. Vol. 2. Cham: Springer; 2017.
  106. [106] Wals AEJ, Lenglet F. Sustainability citizens: collaborative and disruptive social learning. In: Horne R, Fien J, Beza BB, Nelson A, editors. Sustainability Citizenship in Cities. Routledge; 2016. p. 52-66.
  107. [107]Hopkins C, McKeown R. Guidelines and recommendations for reorienting teacher education to address sustainability. Paris: UNESCO; 2005. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000143370
  108. [108]Sandri OJ. Exploring the role and value of creativity in education for sustainability. Environ. Educ. Res. 2013;19(6):765-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.749978