Keywords
Information Technology
Sex Education
Communication
Adolescents
How to Cite
Abstract
Introduction. Sexting behaviors in adolescents constitute a growing problem, where communication between parents and adolescents can act as a protective factor; however, little is known about the incidence of this variable in the national context. Objective. To establish the association between parent-adolescent communication and sexting behaviors among school-aged adolescents from Bucaramanga, Colombia. Methodology. A non-experimental, observational, analytical and cross-sectional study was carried out. The participants were 399 students selected by cluster sampling, who filled out a sociodemographic data form, the Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale and the Sexting Behavior Scale. Statistical procedures were performed in SPSS version 25. Bivariate and multivariate associations were calculated using odds ratios (OR), with parent communication as the independent variables, sexting as the dependent variable and demographic data as possible confounding variables. Results. It was found that 36.30% of the adolescents maintained open communication with the mother and 56.70% with the father. The prevalence of sexting was 6.80%. Sexting behaviors were not associated with communication with the father (OR=0.91; IC95%=0.42-2.00) and with the mother (OR=0.61; IC95%=0.28-3.79). Conclusions. Adolescents communicate better with fathers than with mothers and do not engage in frequent sexting practices. Parent-adolescent communication does not constitute a significant protective factor for sexting behaviors in students.
References
Aviles AM, Anderson TR, Davila ER. Child and adolescent social‐emotional development within the context of school. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2006; 11(1): 32–9. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2005.00365.x
Ponton LE, Judice S. Typical adolescent sexual development. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2004; 13(3): 497–511. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2004.02.003
Liang M, Simelane S, Fortuny Fillo G, Chalasani S, Weny K, Salazar Canelos P, et al. The state of adolescent sexual and reproductive health. J Adolesc Health. 2019; 65(6): S3–15. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.09.015
Cryan G, Cimas M. Acceso a información vinculada a sexualidad a través del ámbito educativo y las TIC. Cienc Docencia Tecnol. 2018; (2957): 256–71. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.33255/2957/369
Molla C, Nájera P, López-González E, Losilla J. Development and validation of the Adolescent Sexting Scale (A-SextS) with a Spanish sample. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(21): 8042. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218042
Gassó AM, Klettke B, Agustina JR, Montiel I. Sexting, Mental Health, and Victimization Among Adolescents: A Literature Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(13): 2364. doi: https: //www.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132364
Gabriel, F. Sexting, Selfies and Self-Harm: Young People, Social Media and the Performance of Self-Development. Media International Australia. 2014; 151(1): 104-112. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1177/1329878x1415100114
Wolak J, Finkelhor D. Sexting: A typology. Pearson; 2011. doi: https: //scholars.unh.edu/ccrc/48/
Mori C, Cooke JE, Temple JR, Ly A, Lu Y, Anderson N, et al. The prevalence of sexting behaviors among emerging adults: A meta-analysis. Arch Sex Behav. 2020; 49(4): 1103–19. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01656-4
Madigan S, Ly A, Rash CL, Van Ouytsel J, Temple JR. Prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior among youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2018; 172(4): 327. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5314
Gabriel, F. Sexting, selfies and self-harm: young people, social media and the performance of self-development. Media International Australia. 2014; 151(1): 104-112. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1177/1329878x1415100114
Valido A, Espelage DL, Hong JS, Rivas-Koehl M, Robinson LE. Social-ecological examination of non-consensual sexting perpetration among U.S. adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(24): 9477. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249477
Aumgartner SE, Sumter SR, Peter J, Valkenburg PM, Livingstone S. Does country context matter? Investigating the predictors of teen sexting across Europe. Comput Human Behav. 2014; 34: 157-64. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.041
Klettke B, Hallford DJ, Clancy E, Mellor DJ, Toumbourou JW. Sexting and psychological distress: The role of unwanted and coerced sexts. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019; 22(4): 237–42. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0291
Riesch SK, Anderson LS, Krueger HA. Parent–child communication processes: Preventing children’s health‐risk behavior. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2006; 11(1): 41–56. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6155.2006.00042.x
Strasburger VC, Zimmerman H, Temple JR, et al. Teenagers, Sexting, and the Law. Pediatrics. 2019; 143(5): e20183183. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-3183
Olson DH. Circumplex Model VII: Validation studies and FACES III. Fam Process. 1986; 25(3): 337–51. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1986.00337.x
Olson DH. Circumplex Model of marital and family systems. J Fam Ther. 2000; 22(2): 144–67. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00144
Barnes HL, Olson DH. Parent-Adolescent Communication and the Circumplex Model. Child Dev. 1985; 56(2): 438. doi: http: //www.jstor.org/stable/1129732
Widman L, Javidi H, Maheux AJ, Evans R, Nesi J, Choukas-Bradley S. Sexual communication in the digital age: Adolescent sexual communication with parents and friends about sexting, pornography, and starting relationships online. Sex Cult. 2021; 25(6): 2092–109. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09866-1
Howard D, Jarman HK, Clancy EM, Renner HM, Smith R, Rowland B, et al. Sexting among Australian adolescents: Risk and protective factors. J Youth Adolesc. 2023; 52(10): 2113–30. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01827-1
Pistoni C, Martinez Damia S, Alfieri S, Marta E, Confalonieri E, Pozzi M. What are the predictors of sexting behavior among adolescents? The positive youth development approach. J Adolesc. 2023; 95(4): 661–71. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1002/jad.12142
Cuccì G, Olivari MG, Colombo CC, Confalonieri E. Risk or fun? Adolescent attitude towards sexting and parental practices. J Fam Stud. 2024; 30(1): 22–43. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2023.2189151
Ayala C. La reconquista conservadora - Colombia 1957-1958. Historia Crítica. 1995; 11: 21-38. doi: https: //journals.openedition.org/histcrit/27113
Araujo-Robles ED, Ucedo-Silva VH, Bueno-Cuadra R. Validación de la Escala de Comunicación Padres-Adolescente en jóvenes universitarios de Lima. Rev Digit Investig Docencia Univ. 2018; 253–72. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.19083/ridu.12.560
Taber KS. The use of cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 2018; 48(6): 1273–96. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Rodríguez-Castro Y, Alonso-Ruido P, González-Fernández A, Lameiras-Fernández M, Faílde-Garrido J-M. Validación de la Escala de Comportamientos de Sexting en Adolescentes: Prevalencia y Consecuencias Asociadas. Psicol Educ. 2021; 27(2): 177–185. doi: https: //doi.org/10.5093/psed2021a9
Greenland S. Multivariate estimation of exposure-specific incidence from case-control studies. J Chronic Dis. 1981; 34(9–10): 445–53. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(81)90004-7
Zhang Y. Quality matters more than quantity: Parent–child communication and adolescents’ academic performance. Front Psychol. 2020; 11. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01203
Scheibling C. “real heroes care”: How dad bloggers are reconstructing fatherhood and masculinities. Men Masc. 2020; 23(1): 3–19. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1177/1097184x18816506
Baumrind D. The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. J Early Adolesc. 1991; 11(1): 56-95. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1177/0272431691111004
Morillo S, Ríos IN, Henao GC. Evaluación empírica del sexting y las actividades rutinarias de los adolescentes en Colombia. OBETS Rev Cienc Soc. 2022; 17(2): 285. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.14198/obets2022.17.2.07
De la Rosa GK, Reyes CP. Relaciones funcionales del uso de las redes sociales, autoestima corporal y práctica del sexting en los adolescentes de 14 a 18 años en la ciudad de Barranquilla. Corporación Universidad de la Costa; 2022. doi: https: //repositorio.cuc.edu.co/handle/11323/9227
King BM. The influence of social desirability on sexual behavior surveys: A review. Arch Sex Behav. 2022; 51(3): 1495–501. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02197-0
Kotiuga J, Yampolsky MA, Martin GM. Adolescents’ perception of their sexual self, relational capacities, attitudes towards sexual pleasure and sexual practices: A descriptive analysis. J Youth Adolesc. 2022; 51(3): 486–98. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01543-8
Banerjee A, Chitnis UB, Jadhav SL, Bhawalkar JS, Chaudhury S. Hypothesis testing, type I and type II errors. Ind Psychiatry J. 2009; 18(2): 127-31. doi: https: //doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.62274
Van Ouytsel J, Van Gool E, Walrave M, Ponnet K, Peeters E. Sexting: adolescents' perceptions of the applications used for, motives for, and consequences of sexting. J Youth Stud. 2017; 20(4): 446-70. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1241865
Dully J, Walsh K, Doyle C, O’Reilly G. Adolescent experiences of sexting: A systematic review of the qualitative literature, and recommendations for practice. J Adolesc. 2023; 95(6): 1077–105. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1002/jad.12181
Usonwu I, Ahmad R, Curtis-Tyler K. Parent–adolescent communication on adolescent sexual and reproductive health in sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative review and thematic synthesis. Reprod Health. 2021; 18(1). doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01246-0
Dolev-Cohen M, Ricon T. Dysfunctional parent–child communication about sexting during adolescence. Arch Sex Behav. 2022; 51(3): 1689–702. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02286-8
Rogers AA. Parent–adolescent sexual communication and adolescents’ sexual behaviors: A conceptual model and systematic review. Adolesc Res Rev. 2017; 2(4): 293–313. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40894-016-0049-5
World medical association declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013; 310(20):2191-2194. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Neddy Pamela Castañeda-Daniels, Aura Loreniz Cantor-Portilla, Katherine Mosquera-Maturana, Yeison David Gallo-Barrera