Double extractor induction motor: Variational calculation using the HamiltonJacobi-Bellman formalism

Fernando Mesa, Carlos A Ramírez, José José Barba-Ortega

Double extractor induction motor: Variational calculation using the HamiltonJacobi-Bellman formalism

Revista UIS Ingenierías, vol. 19, no. 3, 2020

Universidad Industrial de Santander

Fernando Mesa

Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Colombia


Carlos A Ramírez

Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia


José José Barba-Ortega

Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia


Received: 29 November 2019

Accepted: 10 March 2020

Published: 21 May 2020

Abstract: This contribution presents optimal control over a double extractor induction motor using formalism through variational model. The criterion is subject to non-stationary equations of a reduced order (Dynamics equations of a reduced order model (DSIM)). As is well know, in this model the state variables are the rotor flow and motor speed in a circuit mechanical process. For non-stationary and stationary states, based on the theory of optimal control, this limit provides a high expensive function given as a weighted contribution of a DSIM theory. To order to acquire a lowest energy rotor flow path, the idea is to minimize the function to a dynamic of two equations of the motor speed and rotor flow. This problem is solved using with the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation and a time dependent solution for the rotor flow is determined analytically.

Keywords: dynamic programmic, optimal control theory, cost function, subderivates.

Resumen: Esta contribución presenta un control óptimo sobre un motor de inducción de doble extractor usando formalismo a través del modelo variacional. El criterio está sujeto a ecuaciones no-estacionarias de orden reducido (Ecuaciones Dinámicas de un Modelo de Orden Reducido (DSIM)). Como es bien sabido, en este modelo las variables de estado son el flujo del rotor y la velocidad del motor en un proceso mecánico de circuito. Para estados no-estacionario y estacionarios, basados en la teoría del control óptimo, este límite proporciona una función costosa dada como una contribución ponderada de una teoría DSIM. Para adquirir una ruta de flujo de rotor de energía más baja, la idea es minimizar la función a una dinámica de dos ecuaciones de la velocidad del motor y el flujo del rotor. Este problema se resuelve utilizando la ecuación de Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman y se determina analíticamente una solución dependiente del tiempo para el flujo del rotor.

Palabras clave: programación dinámica, teoría optima de control, función de costo, subderivadas.

1. Introduction

Variational problems have stimulated, in the last decade, theoretical and analytical research in several topics in mathematical physics. The variational model has disadvantages when the method is applied for analysis in high order plants. However, unrestricted design may not work properly in practice. Due to the limited variables and the restricted control could cause serious performance deterioration. The controllers must be synthesized to achieve the desired one. A great attempt was made in non-linear minimization and development on this system attracting a big attention of the scientific community. The objective is to design a controller for a type of systems with limitations on states and control. The model gives a practical model in which the designer can resume the limited controllers to get the goals of the synthesis below is the Jacobi-Bellman equation [6].

Let a systems be simulated by the equation:

(1)

The measure to be minimized is:

(2)

ℎ and 𝑔 are specified functions, 𝑡0 and 𝑡𝑓 are bounded and 𝜏 is a phantom integration variable now it is considered longer problems and subdividing the interval is:

(3)

The principle of optimality is:

(4)

Where 𝐽∗(𝑥(𝑡+∆𝑡),𝑡+∆𝑡 is the minimum process cost for a time interval 𝑡+∆𝑡≤𝜏≤𝑡𝑓 with an initial state x(t + ∆𝑡). Assuming that the second partial derivative of 𝐽∗ exists and that it is limited 𝐽∗(𝑥(𝑡+∆𝑡),𝑡+∆𝑡 can be expanded, 𝑡 + ∆𝑡 in Taylor series around one point (𝑥 (𝑡),𝑡) is obtained.

(5)

Now for little ones ∆𝑡

(6)

Where 𝑂(∆𝑡) denotes the terms contained [∆𝑡]2 of the highest order of ∆𝑡 that arise from the approximation of the integral and the truncation produced from the expansion in Taylor series, now removing the terms 𝐽(𝑥 (𝑡),𝑡) and 𝐽𝑡(𝑥(𝑡),𝑡).

Minimization is obtained:

(7)

Dividing by ∆𝑡 taking the limit when ∆𝑡→ 0 gives:

(8)

To find the limits for this differential equation let 𝑡 =𝑡𝑓 give:

(9)

The Hamiltonian is defined as:

(10)

(11)

Since the minimization of the control will depend on 𝑥,𝐽𝑥 , and t using those definitions the Hamilton-Jacobi equation is obtained:

(12)

This equation is the analog in continuous time to the Bellman's recurrence equation, however it will refer to (12) as the Hamilton-Jacobi- Bellman equation [7].

2. Application problem

The complete dynamic model of the DSIM is [1]:

(13)

By notation 𝑊𝑠=𝜌̇ is the frequency of the motor, 𝑅𝑠 and 𝑅𝑟 are the stator and rotor resistors respectively 𝐿𝑠 𝑦 𝐿𝑟, are the inductances of the stator and rotor respectively. M is the magnetization, 𝐿𝑠𝑝 is the main cyclic inductance, 𝐽𝑚 is the moment of inertia of the rotor, 𝐾𝑙 is the constant torque load, 𝐿𝑠1𝑑, 𝐿𝑠2𝑑, 𝐿𝑠1𝑞 y 𝐿𝑠2𝑞 are the direct and quadrature current of stator 1 and stator 2 respectively. 𝑣𝑠1𝑑, 𝑣𝑠2𝑑, 𝑣𝑠1𝑞 y 𝑣𝑠2𝑞 are respectively the voltages of each stator on the dq axes, 𝑝 is the number of poles, 𝛾 is the electromagnetic torque [2].

To eliminate the non-linear terms of (13), the order of the DSIM model of an integral proportional control (PI) is reduced to a simple one with proportional gain and the following is defined:

(13.1)

(13.2)

Where 0 <𝜖 <1 and 𝑈 is a system command, the usual form of reduced model is obtained as follows: the cost of the function can be defined as:

(14)

The index corresponding to the weighted sum is

(15)

The factors 𝛽1, 𝛽2, 𝛽3, are weighted and are used to scale the energy power while minimizing the cost function minimizes the stored magnetic energy and minimize of losses in the winding increasing the efficiency of the machine [3]. The power in the rotating frame (d-q) is:

(16)

The system (13) has that the input power is given by:

(17)

The relationship between the stator and rotor current is given by:

(18)

The active power is:

(19)

The equation (17) is defined as the derivative of the stored magnetic field is given as follows:

(20)

Joule's losses are given by:

(21)

By using equation (13) and equation (21), Power losses can be as:

(22)

In this document, the operations of the mechanical process are restricted to Acceleration modes to limit the transitional study. Then the engine speed can be expressed as follows:

(23)

With 𝑐0 > 0.

2.1 Determination of the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation

To increase the readability of subsequent equations it will be denoted 𝑥1 = 𝜑𝑟 and 𝑥2= 𝛺.

The dynamics of the system and the cost of the function are defined as:

(24)

And

(25)

Therefore, the function 𝑣 (𝑇,𝑥1), which necessarily satisfies the boundary condition 𝑣 (𝑇,𝑥1),= 𝑘 (𝑥1(𝑡)), where 𝑘 (𝑥1(𝑡)) is the final state:

(26)

The optimal co-state 𝜆∗(𝑡) corresponds to the gradient of the cost function to be optimized:

(27)

Where is continuously differentiable with respect to 𝑥1 and 𝑥1=𝑥1∗ along the admissible path 𝑢1(.) and 𝑢1∗(.) corresponding sub-optimal cost function is:

(28)

It is given as:

(29)

According to the following differential equation:

(30)

Thus:

(31)

This is an equation for the optimal cost function, which is called (HJB) [4] [5]. So, we found an optimum for the variable 𝑢∗(𝑡,𝑥1), with the subsequent state variable 𝑥1∗(𝑡), considering of the following equation.

(32)

Which transfers the initial state 𝛷𝑟(0)= 𝛷𝑟0 and a final state 𝑥1(0)=𝛷𝑟(𝑇) with the limit:

(33)

This determines the HJB equation:

(34)

The model described in (34) was simulated numerically and the results are shown below.

4. Conclusions

We present an optimal control over a double stator induction motor using an energy minimization model via a DSIM model. For to obtain a minimum energy rotor flow path, the process is to minimize this limited function to a no-static of two equations set of the rotor flow and motor speed. The optimum control system is analyzed by the HJB equation and the rotor flow solution is determined in a mathematical manner which varies over time.

Rotor speed reference
Figure 1.
Rotor speed reference


Optimum rotor flow
Figure 2.
Optimum rotor flow


Engine reference speed estimated speed
Figure 3.
Engine reference speed estimated speed


Reference flow and estimated flow
Figure 4.
Reference flow and estimated flow


Reference current and current under control
Figure 5.
Reference current and current under control


References

[1] J. Chiasson, Modeling and high performance control of electric machines vol. 26. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 2005.

[2] I. Kortas, A. Sakly, M. F. Mimouni, M. F. “Analytical solution of optimized energy consumption of Double Star Induction Motor operating in transient regime using a Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation,” Energy, vol 89, pp. 55, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.035

[3] J. H. Chang, B. K. Kim, “Minimum-time minimum-loss speed control of induction motors under field-oriented control,” IEEE transactions on industrial electronics, no. 6, vol. 44, pp. 809 1997.

[4] D. E. Kirk, Optimalcontrol theory: an introduction. Mineola, NY, USA: Dover Publications, Inc., 2006.

[5] D. S. Naidu, Optimalcontrol systems. Pocatello, ID, USA: CRC Press LLC., 2003

[6] K. Jasem, H. M. Jaddu, “The optimal control of a three-phase induction motor,” Proceedings of the 25th IASTED Conference, Lanzarote, Spain, 2006.

[7] A. Rubaai, O. Urbina, M. D. Kankam, “Design of an adaptive nonlinear controller-based optimal control theory for a voltage source induction motor drive system,” Conference Record of the 2001 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. 36th IAS Annual Meeting, vol. 2, 2001, pp. 1279.

[8] H. P. Geering, Optimal control with engineering applications. Springer, NY,USA, 2007.

[9] K. Okano, K. Hagino, “Adaptive control design approximating solution of Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation for nonlinear strict-feedback system with uncertainties,” SICE Annual Conference, pp. 204. 2008.

[10] J. Seiffertt, S. Sanyal, D. C. Wunsch, “Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations and approximate dynamic programming on time scales,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, no 4, vol. 38, p. 918, 2008.

[11] J. Gough, V. A. Belavkin, O. G. Smolyanov, “Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations for quantum optimal control,” Days on Diffraction, pp. 293297, 2006.

[12] S. Lyashevskiy, Y. Chen, “Optimization of continuous-time systems with constraints: controller design using the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman theory,” Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 2, pp. 2006.

Additional information

How to cite: F. Mesa, C. Ramírez, J. Barba-Ortega, “Double extractor induction motor: Variational calculation using the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellmanformalism,” Rev. UIS Ing., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 97-102, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.18273/revuin.v19n3-2020010

Secciones
Revista UIS Ingenierías
ISSN: 1657-4583
Vol. 19
Num. 3
Año. 2020

Double extractor induction motor: Variational calculation using the HamiltonJacobi-Bellman formalism

FernandoCarlos AJosé José MesaRamírezBarba-Ortega
Universidad Tecnológica de PereiraUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia,ColombiaColombiaColombia
Contexto
Descargar
Todas