Vol. 19 No. 1 (2021): Revista Fuentes, el reventón energético
Articles

Análisis de viabilidad en la implementación de energía geotérmica en aguas asociadas a la producción de hidrocarburos

Andrea Bohórquez-Araque
Universidad Industrial de Santander
Harold Garavito-Reyes
Universidad Industrial de Santander

Published 2020-12-10

Keywords

  • Low-Enthalpy geothermal energy,
  • Organic Rankine Cycle,
  • production water,
  • geothermal energy

How to Cite

Bohórquez-Araque, A., & Garavito-Reyes, H. (2020). Análisis de viabilidad en la implementación de energía geotérmica en aguas asociadas a la producción de hidrocarburos. Fuentes, El reventón energético, 19(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.18273/revfue.v19n1-2021004

Abstract

The water-cut or ratio of water to oil is about 92% or higher per day in Colombia. In some oil basins like Los Llanos or Putumayo, the water is extracted with relatively high temperatures that are 115 °C, a potential geothermal resource of low-to-medium enthalpy. Usually, this hot water is wasted instead of being used as a resource to generate electricity by the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) technology. In this paper, an ORC power plant’s technical and economic feasibility analysis is carried out for an oil field with the characteristics mentioned above. The base case for the technical simulation compiles the characteristics and optimal conditions that allow the ORC plant’s proper performance. A sensitivity analysis of mass flow and temperature allows the best working fluid and optimum mass flows to obtain the ORC plant’s best efficiency. As a result, an ORC module with a geothermal fluid input of 30 kg/s and a power output of 1.5 MW is technically feasible. Economically, this module presents an IRR higher than 17% over 8 years.
The production of efficient, favorable, and sustainable energy through the development of co-generation projects such as ORC geothermal plants can contribute to an oil field’s energy demand with positive impacts in a noon
carbon tax causation. In addition, this type of project also has social impacts facilitating remote communities to access electricity and clean energy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANH, Agencia Nacional de Hidrocarburos, Colombia. Available at: http://www.anh.gov.co. (Accessed: 21st August 2018).

Bertani, R. “Geothermal power generation in the world 2005–2010 update report”. Geothermics 41, 1–29 (2012).

Caldiño-Herrera, U., García, J. C., Sierra-Espinosa, F. Z. & Dávalos, J. “Diseño termodinámico de un ciclo Rankine orgánico para el aprovechamiento energético de aguas termales”. 6 (2017).

DiPippo, R. “Binary Cycle Power Plants”. in Geothermal Power Plants 193–239 (Elsevier, 2016). doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100879-9.00008-2.

DiPippo, R. “Geothermal energy Electricity generation, and environmental impact”. Energy Policy 19, 798–807 (1991).

Gu, Z. & Sato, H. “Performance of supercritical cycles for geothermal binary design”. Energy Convers. Manag. 43, 961–971 (2002).

Heberle, F. & Brüggemann, D. “Exergy based fluid selection for a geothermal Organic Rankine Cycle for combined heat and power generation”. Appl. Therm. Eng. 30, 1326–1332 (2010).

International Energy Agency. Technology Roadmap: Geothermal Heat and Power. (OECD Publishing, 2011). doi: 10.1787/9789264118485-en.

Lakew, A. A. & Bolland, O. “Working fluids for lowtemperature heat source”. Appl. Therm. Eng. 30, 1262–1268 (2010).

Lee, K. C. Classification of Geothermal Resources - An engineering approach. (Geothermal Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, NZ, 1996).

Maizza, V. & Maizza, A. “Working fluids in nonsteady flows for waste energy recovery systems”. Appl. Therm. Eng. 16, 579–590 (1996).

Reynolds, W. C. Thermodynamic properties in SI : graphs, tables, and computational equations for forty substances. (Stanford, CA : Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 1979).

Sanyal, S. K., Butler, S. J. & Drive, B. “Geothermal Power Capacity from Petroleum Wells – Some Case Histories of Assessment”.

Shengjun, Z., Huaixin, W. & Tao, G. “Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for lowtemperature geothermal power generation”. Appl. Energy 88, 2740–2754 (2011).

The future of geothermal energy: impact of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st century: an assessment. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2006).

Vélez, F., Chejne, F. & Quijano, A. “Thermodynamic analysis of R134a in an Organic Rankine Cycle for power generation from low-temperature sources”. DYNA 81, 153–159 (2014).

Vetter, C., Wiemer, H.-J. & Kuhn, D. “Comparison of sub- and supercritical Organic Rankine Cycles for power generation from low-temperature/lowenthalpy geothermal wells, considering specific net
power output and efficiency”. Appl. Therm. Eng. 51, 871–879 (2013).