Vol. 16 No. 2 (2018): Fuentes, el reventón energético
Articles

Methodology to rank emerging technologies of chemical enhanced oil recovery method

Claudia Lorena Delgadillo Aya
Instituto Colombiano del Petróleo
Venus Minerva Díaz Guardia
Universidad industrial de Santander
Venus Minerva Díaz Guardia
Universidad industrial de Santander
Gustavo Adolfo Maya Toro
Instituto Colombiano del Petróleo
Rubén Hernán Castro García
Instituto Colombiano del Petróleo
Henderson Ivan Quintero Pérez
Instituto Colombiano del Petróleo

Published 2018-12-18

Keywords

  • Emerging technologies, chemical enhanced oil recovery, screening, technology prioritization, modified polymers, modified water.

How to Cite

Delgadillo Aya, C. L., Díaz Guardia V. M., Díaz Guardia V. M., Maya Toro, G. A., Castro García R. H., & Quintero Pérez H. I. (2018). Methodology to rank emerging technologies of chemical enhanced oil recovery method. Fuentes, El reventón energético, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.18273/revfue.v16n2-2018003

Abstract

Due to the increase in energy consumption and current challenges replacing reserves, the implementation of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes will continue playing a fundamental role in the global energy balance, either by increasing the recovery factor or by incorporating reserves. Therefore, increase the efficiency of EOR methods represents an important challenge in today’s oil industry and its research is showing a growing interest. For this reason, this work developed a methodology to rank emerging technologies of chemical EOR (CEOR) that can be implemented in Colombian fields in the mid-term. The proposed methodology can be implemented for the prioritization of technologies in general. However, this work is focused on identifying CEOR emerging technologies such as: modified polymers with different functionalities, nanotechnology for CEOR, new surfactants, modified water injection and strong dissociations of chemical substances. Taking into account the novelty of these technologies and the limited number of protocols available to properly evaluate it at laboratory and numerical scale, a set of parameters to assess these technologies in terms of viability for field implementation were defined. These parameters include: 

process maturity degree using Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) concept, expected recovery efficiency, available reserves and Security Energy Commission (SEC) reservoir analogy, associated costs, commercialization, strategic alignment with the Colombian oil industry needs and, finally, the potential environmental impact. Based on the definition of technical screening parameters for each technology and the evaluation of the set of parameters defined in the proposed methodology, a comparative process of the potential of each of the technologies evaluated with the needs of the Colombian fields was carried out. The results of this ranking methodology identified the injection of modified polymer with functionalities and the injection of modified water as the technologies with the largest potential for field implementation. Finally, the ranking of these CEOR technologies will allow focusing efforts in the selection of those with greater potential optimizing time and resources. In addition, it will contribute materializing field development plans, extending production life of Colombian assets as well as supporting the incorporation of oil reserves in the country.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albonico, P., & Lockhart, T. P. (1993, January). Divalent ion-resistant polymer gels for high- temperature applications: syneresis inhibiting additives. In SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Castro-Garcia, R. H., Maya-Toro, G. A., Jimenez- Diaz, R., Quintero-Perez, H. I., Díaz-Guardia, V. M., Colmenares-Vargas, K. M., ... & Pérez- Romero, R. A. (2016). Polymer flooding to improve volumetric sweep efficiency in waterflooding processes. CT&F-Ciencia, Tecnología y Futuro, 6(3), 71-90.
Choudry, S. A., Müller, S., Alber, U., Riedel, F., & Landgrebe, D. (2018). A Multidimensional Assessment and Selection Methodology: Optimized Decision-making of Joining Technologies in Automobile Body Development. Procedia Manufacturing, 21, 281-288.
Delgadillo-Aya, C. L., Trujillo-Portillo, M. L., Palma-Bustamante, J. M., Niz-Velasquez, E., Rodriguez, C. L., & Leon-Martinez, N. E. (2014, June). Software Tool for the Study, Analysis and Evaluation of Enhanced Oil Recovery Processes. In SPE Energy Resources Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Díaz, R. J., Navarro, S. F. M., & Tavera, C. P. S. (2007). Modelo estadístico para la realización de analogías orientadas a procesos de recobro mejorado. Fuentes: El reventón energético, 5(1), 5.
Elraies, K. A., Tan, I. M., Fathaddin, M. T., & Abo- Jabal, A. (2011). Development of a new polymeric surfactant for chemical enhanced oil recovery. Petroleum Science and Technology, 29(14), 1521-1528.
Gray, M., Yeung, A., Foght, J., & Yarranton, H. W. (2008, January). Potential microbial enhanced oil recovery processes: a critical analysis. In SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Green D. y Willhite P. (Vol 6) (1998) Enhanced Oil Recovery. Kansas, USA: Society of Petroleum Engineering. (SPE ) Textbook series.
J. Banke, Technology Readiness Levels Demystified, NASA, 2010.
Jadhunandan, P. P., & Morrow, N. R. (1995). Effect of wettability on waterflood recovery for crude-oil/brine/rock systems. SPE reservoir engineering, 10(01), 40-46.
Khavkin, A. (2014, January). EOR/IOR- Nanotechnologies: Present and Future. In 21st World Petroleum Congress. World Petroleum Congress.
Krumrine, P. H., Lefenfeld, M., & Romney, G. A. (2016). Alkali Metal Silicides: A New Material for Heavy-Oil Production Processes. SPE Journal, 21(01), 22-31.
Kudaibergenov, S. E., & Ciferri, A. (2007). Natural and Synthetic Polyampholytes, 2: Functions and Applications. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 28(20), 1969-1986.
Lee, W. J. (2009, January). Modernization of the SEC Oil and Gas Reserves Reporting Requirements. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Maudgalya, S., Knapp, R. M., & McInerney, M. (2007, January). Microbially enhanced oil recovery technologies: a review of the past, present and future. In Production and Operations Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Molano, A. M. J., Navarro, S. F. M., & Díaz, R. J. (2014). Metodología para el diseño de baches en un proceso de inyección de polímeros para recobro mejorado, considerando fenómenos de interacción roca/fluidos. Fuentes: El reventón energético, 12(2), 6.
Nazari Moghaddam, R., Bahramian, A., Fakhroueian, Z., Karimi, A., & Arya, S. (2015). Comparative study of using nanoparticles for enhanced oil recovery: wettability alteration of carbonate rocks. Energy & Fuels, 29(4), 2111-2119.
Ogolo, N. A., Olafuyi, O. A., & Onyekonwu, M. O. (2012, January). Enhanced oil recovery using nanoparticles. In SPE Saudi Arabia section technical symposium and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Portwood, J. T. (1995, January). A commercial microbial enhanced oil recovery technology: evaluation of 322 projects. In SPE Production Operations Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Ragab, A. M. S. (2014). Investigating the potential of nanomaterials for enhanced oil recovery: state of art. Journal of Science and Technology, 6(1).
Reyes, J. P., Trujillo, M. L., Velásquez, E. N., & Aya, C. L. D. (2017). Metodología para la selección y priorización de yacimientos de crudo liviano candidatos a la inyección de aire: caso de aplicación. Fuentes: El reventón energético, 15(1), 41-48.
Security and Exchange Commission, «Modernization of oil and gas reporting,» SEC, Washington D.C. , 2010.
Seright, R. S. (2017, April). How much polymer should be injected during a polymer flood? Review of previous and current practices. In IOR 2017-19th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery.
Tang, G. Q., & Morrow, N. R. (1997). Salinity, temperature, oil composition, and oil recovery by waterflooding. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 12(04), 269-276.
Tang, G. Q., & Morrow, N. R. (1999). Influence of brine composition and fines migration on crude oil/brine/rock interactions and oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 24(2-4), 99-111.
Tapias Hernandez, F. A., Lizcano Niño, J. C., Moreno, L., & Zanoni, R. B. (2018). Effects of salts and temperature on rheological and viscoelastic behavior of low molecular weight HPAM solutions. Revista Fuentes, El Reventón Energético, 16(1).
Thomas, S. (2008). Enhanced oil recovery-an overview. Oil & Gas Science and Technology- Revue de l’IFP, 63(1), 9-19.
Wever, D. A. Z., Picchioni, F., & Broekhuis, A. A. (2011). Polymers for enhanced oil recovery: a paradigm for structure–property relationship in aqueous solution. Progress in Polymer Science, 36(11), 1558-1628.
Wever, D. A. Z., Ramalho, G., Picchioni, F., & Broekhuis, A. A. (2014). Acrylamide‐b‐N‐ isopropylacrylamide block copolymers: Synthesis by atomic transfer radical polymerization in water and the effect of the hydrophilic–hydrophobic ratio on the solution properties. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 131(2).
Wever, D. A., Polgar, L. M., Stuart, M. C., Picchioni, F., & Broekhuis, A. A. (2013). Polymer molecular architecture as a tool for controlling the rheological properties of aqueous polyacrylamide solutions for enhanced oil recovery. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52(47), 16993-17005.
Winnik, M. A., & Yekta, A. (1997). Associative polymers in aqueous solution. Current opinion in colloid & interface science, 2(4), 424-436.
Wu, Y., Mahmoudkhani, A., Watson, P., Fenderson, T. R., & Nair, M. (2012, January). Development of new polymers with better performance under conditions of high temperature and high salinity. In SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Xingcai, W., & Xiong, C. (2015). A novel particle- type polymer and IOR/EOR property evalution.