Effect of dopants addition on the displacing phase properties in a polymer flooding process using computed tomography scanning
Published 2023-11-30
Keywords
- Polymer flooding,
- Oil recovery,
- Viscosity,
- Dopant agents,
- Computer tomography scan
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Maria Sandoval Martinez, Luis Miguel Salas Chia, Guillermo Andrés Ibarra Gómez, Elízabeth Pilar Pineda Cifuentes, Astrid Xiomara Rodríguez Castelblanco, Juan Camilo Díaz Mateus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This study evaluated the impact of the four most used dopants in core-flooding tests, supported by computed tomography, on the behavior of polymer viscosity. Initially, the minimum concentration of each dopant required to achieve an adequate contrast between phases was estimated by varying the amount of dopant in solution and comparing the CT number of polymer solution and oil to guarantee a differential highest than 300 CT. Afterward, the effect of adding the different dopants on the polymer solution viscosity was determined through Brookfield viscosimeter. Subsequently, the polymer concentration to counteract the viscosity reduction was quantified by adding different polymer amounts. The results showed that sodium iodide achieved the highest attenuating effect between phases with the lowest dopant concentration. Moreover, this dopant caused the lowest polymer viscosity diminution and required the smallest increase in polymer concentration to reach the base case viscosity, making this dopant the most suitable agent to be used in polymer injection experiments at the conditions evaluated. Finally, the impact of crude oil density on the lowest amount of dopant required to achieve sufficient differentiation between phases was analyzed, and as a result, a correlation was found that could be used in future experiments at similar conditions to evaluate polymer flooding in a porous medium by means computed tomography scan as a visual and non-intrusive technique, reaching the best contrast between crude oil and HPAM.
Downloads
References
- Irfan M, Stephen KD, Lenn CP. An experimental study to investigate novel physical mechanisms that enhance viscoelastic polymer flooding and further increase desaturation of residual oil saturation. Upstream Oil and Gas Technology. 2021;6:100026. doi.org/10.1016/j.upstre.2020.100026
- Pothula GK, Kumar Vij R, Bera A. An overview of chemical enhanced oil recovery and its status in India. 2023;20(4):2305-2323. doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2023.01.001
- Rellegadla S, Prajapat G, Agrawal A. Polymers for enhanced oil recovery: fundamentals and selection criteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;101:4387–402. doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8307-4
- Hamza M, Sinnathambi C, A Merican Z. Recent advancement of hybrid materials used in chemical enhanced oil recovery (CEOR): A review. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng [Internet]. 2017;206(1):012007. doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/206/1/012007
- Karovic-Maricic V, Lekovic B, Danilovic D. Factors influencing successful implementation of enhanced oil recovery projects. Podzemni radovi. 2014;22(25):41–50. doi.org/10.5937/podrad1425041K
- Bondino I, Nguyen R, Hamon G, Ormehaug P, Skauge A, Jouenne S. Tertiary polymer flooding in extra-heavy oil: an investigation using 1D and 2D experiments, core scale simulation and pore-scale network models. In: he International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts. 2011. p. 1–12.
- Chen M, Dai J, Liu X, Kuang Y, Wang Z, Gou S, et al. Effect of displacement rates on fluid distributions and dynamics during water flooding in tight oil sandstone cores from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). J Pet Sci Eng. 2020;184:106588. doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106588
- Fang Y, Yang E, Guo S, Cui C, Zhou C. Study on micro remaining oil distribution of polymer flooding in Class-II B oil layer of Daqing Oilfield. Energy. 2022;254(C):124479. doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124479
- van Batenburg DW, Berg S, Oedai S, Elewaut K. SPE-175407-MS Visualization of Oil Mobilization in ASP Core Floods Using X-ray CT Imaging. 2015. doi.org/10.2118/175407-MS
- Tapias Hernández FA, Moreno RBZL. The effectiveness of computed tomography for the experimental assessment of surfactant-polymer flooding. Oil and Gas Science and Technology. 2020;75:5. doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2019069
- Hove AO, Nilsen V. Visualization of Xanthan Flood Behavior in Core Samples by Means of X-Ray Tomography. SPE Res Eng. 1990;5(04):475–480. doi.org/10.2118/17342-PA
- Akin S, Kovsec R. Computed tomography in petroleum engineering research. In: Applications of X-ray Computed Tomography in the Geosciences. 2003. p. 1–250.
- Vinegar HJ, Wellington SL. Tomographic imaging of three-phase flow experiments. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1987;58(1):96–107. doi.org/10.1063/1.1139522
- Wildenschild D, Sheppard AP. X-ray imaging and analysis techniques for quantifying pore scale structure and processes in subsurface porous medium systems. Adv Water Resour. 2013;51:217–46. doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.018
- Alvarado V. Integration of a risk management tool and analytical simulator for assisted decision making in IOR. SPE. 2006;1–5.
- Ahmed S, Alameri W, Al-Shalabi EW. Monitoring of Polymer Injectivity and Mobility Control Performance in Carbonates Using Coreflood Integrated with Computed Tomography (CT). SPE Western Regional Meeting Proceedings [Internet]. 2023 May 15 [cited 2023 Nov 4];2023-May:22–5. doi.org/10.2118/213046-MS
- Ortiz Meneses AF, Herrera Otero E, Santos Santos N. Vista de Estimación de saturaciones in-situ durante experimentos de inyección de fluidos usando tomografía computarizada de rayos X. Fuentes, el reventón energético. 2017;15(2):106–17. doi.org/10.18273/revfue.v15n2-2017009
- WlthJack EM. Computed Tomography for Rock-Property Determination and Fluid-Flow Visualization. 1988.
- Oshita T, Okabe H. Early water breakthrough in carbonate core samples visualized with X-ray CT. 2000.
- Niu B, Yan W, Shapiro AA, Stenby EH. In-Situ Phase Identification and Saturation Determination in Carbon Dioxide Flooding of Water Flooded Chalk Using X-Ray Computed Tomography. In: SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium; 2010 Apr 24–28; Oklahoma, USA. Oklahoma: OnePetro; 2010. doi.org/10.2118/129760-MS
- London M, Cameron S, Donald J, Wassmuth F. SPE-170147-MS Waterflooding Experiments with X-ray CT Imaging. 2014.
- Skauge T. SPE 169740 Polymer Flood at Adverse Mobility Ratio in 2D Flow by X-ray Visualization. 2014.
- Tapias Hernández FA, Santos Santos N, Herrera Otero EH. Efectos de productos dopantes en fluidos para pruebas de desplazamiento usando tomografia computarizada. Revista Fuentes: El Reventón Energético. 2017;14(2):51–63. doi.org/10.18273/revfue.v14n2-2016005
- Oliveira Silveira BM. Projeto de fluido e testes de deslocamento para avaliação da recuperação de óleo pesado por injeção de polímero. 2017.
- Zaitoun A, Potie B. Limiting Conditions for the Use of Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamides in Brines Containing Divalent Ions. Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, (Paper) SPE. 1983 Jun 1;143–50.
- Moradi-Araghi A, Doe PH. Hydrolysis and Precipitation of Polyacrylamides in Hard Brines at Elevated Temperatures. SPE Reservoir Engineering. 1987;2(2):189–98. doi.org/10.2118/13033-PA
- Levitt DB, Slaughter W, Pope GA, Jouenne S. The Effect of Redox Potential and Metal Solubility on Oxidative Polymer Degradation. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering. 2011;14(03):287–98. doi.org/10.2118/129890-PA
- Ali M, Ben Mahmud H. The effects of Concentration and Salinity on Polymer Adsorption Isotherm at Sandstone Rock Surface. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2015;78(1):012038. doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/78/1/012038
- Park H, Han J, Sung W. Effect of polymer concentration on the polymer adsorptioninduced permeability reduction in low permeability reservoirs. Energy. 2015;84:666–71. doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.028