Artigos
Perspectivas do teste de Potencial Bioquímico de Metano - PBM para o controle do processo de digestão anaeróbia de resíduos
Publicado 2016-07-15
Palavras-chave
- Digestão Anaeróbia,
- Biodegradabilidade Anaeróbia,
- Potencial Bioquímico de Metano,
- Resíduos Orgânicos.
Como Citar
Cárdenas Cleves, L. M., Parra Orobio, B. A., Torres Lozada, P., & Vásquez-Franco, C. H. (2016). Perspectivas do teste de Potencial Bioquímico de Metano - PBM para o controle do processo de digestão anaeróbia de resíduos. REVISTA ION, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.18273/revion.v29n1-2016008
Resumo
A digestão anaeróbia é um processo biológico que permite atingir dois propósitos de maneira simultânea, o tratamento de resíduos para o controle da poluição ambiental e o aproveitamento e valorização dos subprodutos gerados: o metano como fonte de energia renovável e o material digerido com potencial de uso agrícola. Para determinar a capacidade de produção de metano, a biodegradabilidade anaeróbia de um substrato orgânico, escolher substratos e prever o desempenho de digestores de grande escala, são realizados testes em escala de bancada em reatores descontínuos como o Potencial Bioquímico de Metano (PBM). Neste artigo apresenta-se uma refexão sobre diferentes assuntos relacionados com este importante teste, como a diversidade na denominação do teste, as diferentes modifcações nas condições operacionais e experimentais, o uso de diferentes unidades de medição, as equações usadas para a quantifcação do metano, dentre outros, que têm conduzido a diversas propostas metodológicas, as quais apresentam diferenças em fatores que condicionam a sua aplicação e a comparação dos resultados com outros estudos. Com esta refexão, ratifca-se a utilidade deste teste, mas também a necessidade de padronizá-lo; portanto, é recomendável relatadas as condições experimentais e operacionais e as unidades adequadas para evitar confusão metodológica e permitir uma maior reprodutibilidade. Além disso, recomenda-se a aprofundar na análise metodológica dos diferentes métodos de medição para obter resultados comparáveis.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Referências
[1] Nkoa R. Agricultural benefits and environmental risks of soil fertilization with anaerobic digestates: A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2014;34(2):473-92.
[2] Owen WF, Stuckey DC, Healy Jr JB, Young LY, McCarty PL. Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Res. 1979;13(6):485-92.
[3] Esposito G, Frunzo L, Liotta F, Panico A, Pirozzi F. Bio-methane potential tests to measure the biogas production from the digestion and co-digestion of complex organic substrates. Open Environ Engine J. 2012;5:1-8.
[4] Hansen TL, Schmidt JE, Angelidaki I, Marca E, la Cour Jansen J, Mosbæk H, et al. Method for determination of methane potentials of solid organic waste. Waste Manage. 2004;24(4):393-400.
[5] Chynoweth D, Turick C, Owens J, Jerger D, Peck M. Biochemical methane potential of biomass and waste feedstocks. Biomass Bioenerg. 1993;5(1):95-111.
[6] VDI. 4630. Fermentation of organic materials. Characterisation of the substrate, sampling, collection of material data, fermentation tests. Alemania: Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, 2006.
[7] Angelidaki I, Alves M, Bolzonella D, Borzacconi L, Campos JL, Guwy AJ, et al. Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: A proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci. Technol. 2009;59:927-34.
[8] Gould MC. Bioenergy and Anaerobic Digestion. En: Bioenergy. Dahiya A, Editor. USA: Academic Press; 2014. p.297-317.
[9] Li YY, Gadow S, Niu Q. Biomass energy using methane and hydrogen from waste materials. En: Topical Themes in Energy and Resources. Tanaka Y, Norton M, Li Y, Editors. Japan: Springer Japan; 2015. p.131-57.
[10] Torres P. Perspectivas del tratamiento anaerobio de aguas residuales domésticas en países en desarrollo. Revista EIA. 2012;9(18):115-29.
[11] Zhang XJ. Anaerobic Process. En: Comprehensive Water Quality and Purification. Ahuja S, Editor. USA: Elsevier Inc; 2014. p. 108-122.
[12] Lesteur M, Bellon-Maurel V, Gonzalez C, Latrille E, Roger JM, Junqua G, et al. Alternative methods for determining anaerobic biodegradability: a review. Process Biochem. 2010;45:431-40.
[13] Buffiere P, Loisel D, Bernet N, Delgenes J. Towards new indicators for the prediction of solid waste anaerobic digestion properties. Water Sci. Technol. 2006;53(8):233-41.
[14] Esposito G, Frunzo L, Liotta F, Panico A, Pirozzi F. Bio-methane potential tests to measure the biogas production from the digestion and co-digestion of complex organic substrates. Open Environ Engine J. 2012;5:1-8.
[15] Lisboa MS, Lansing S. Characterizing food waste substrates for co-digestion through biochemical methane potential (BMP) experiments. Waste Manage. 2013;33(12):2664-9.
[16] Raposo F, Fernández-Cegrí V, de la Rubia MA, Borja R, Béline F, Cavinato C, et al. Biochemical methane potential (BMP) of solid organic substrates: Evaluation of anaerobic biodegradability using data from an international interlaboratory study. J Chem Technol Biot. 2011;86(8):1088-98.
[17] Raposo F, De La Rubia MA, Fernández-Cegrí V, Borja R. Anaerobic digestion of solid organic substrates in batch mode: An overview relating to methane yields and experimental procedures. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2012;16(1):861-77.
[18] Neves L, Oliveira R, Alves MM. Influence of inoculum activity on the bio-methanization of a kitchen waste under different waste/inoculum ratios. Process Biochem. 2004;39:2019-24.
[19] Neves L, Ferreira R, Oliveira R, Alves MM. Influence of inocculum acclimation in the biodegradation rate and estimated biodegradability of cow manure, food waste and oil. Environ Eng Manag J. 2010;9:327-34.
[20] Aquino SF, Chernicharo CA, Foresti E, Santos MLF, Monteggia LO. Metodologias para determinação da atividade metanogênica específica (AME) em lodos anaeróbios. Eng sanit ambient. 2007;12(2):192-201.
[21] Torres P, Pérez A. Actividad Metanogénica Específica: Una herramienta de control y optimización de sistemas de tratamiento anaerobio de aguas residuales. Ingeniería de los Recursos Naturales y del Ambiente. 2010;(9):5-14.
[22] Raposo F, Banks CJ, Siegert I, Heaven S, Borja R. Influence of inoculum to substrate ratio on the biochemical methane potential of maize in batch tests. Process Biochem. 2006;41:1444-50.
[23] Sabry T. Application of the UASB inoculated with flocculent and granular sludge in treating sewage at different hydraulic shock loads.Bioresource Technol. 2008;99(10):4073-4077.
[24] Kuan-Yeow S, Duu-Jong L, Yuegen Y. Anaerobic granulation for wastewater treatment and bioenergy production: Advances and Prospects. En: Handbook of Clean Energy Systems. Jinyue Y, Editor. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Son Ltd; 2015. p. 1834.
[25] Ossa M, Fuentes L. Evaluación de inóculos procedentes de PTAR ́s municipales sobre la digestión anaerobia de la fracción orgánica de residuos sólidos municipales (trabajo de grado). Cali, Colombia: Universidad del Valle; 2015.
[26] Diaz BMC, Espitia VSE, Molina PF. Digestión Anaerobia: una aproximación a la tecnología. Colombia: Unilibros; 2002.
[27] Monteggia L. Proposta de metodologia para avaliação do parâmetro Atividade Metanogênica Específica. Em: 19º Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, ABES; 1997 Set 14-19; Foz do Iguaçu, Brasil: Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental (ABES); 1997. p. 754-66.
[28] Rozzi A, Remigi E. Methods of assessing microbial activity and inhibition under anaerobic conditions: a literature review. Reviews in Environmen Sci Bio/Technol. 2004;3(2):93-115.
[29] Souto TF, Aquino SF, Silva QS, Chernicharo LCA. Influence of incubation conditions on the specific methanogenic activity test. Biodegradation. 2010;21:411-24.
[30] Ortiz J. Puesta a punto de una metodología para la determinación de la actividad metanogénica específica de un fango anaerobio mediante el sistema OxiTop®. Influencia de las principales variables experimentales (Tesis doctoral). Valencia, España: Universidad Politecnica de Valencia; 2011.
[31] De la Rubia M, Fernández-Cegrí V, Raposo F, Borja R. Influence of particle size and chemical composition on the performance and kinetics of anaerobic digestion process of sunflower oil cake in batch mode. Biochem Eng J. 2011;58:162-7.
[32] Labatut RA, Angenent LT, Scott NR. Biochemical methane potential and biodegradability of complex organic substrates. Bioresour. Technol. 2011;102(3):2255-64.
[33] Alves I. Análise Experimental do Potencial de Geração de Biogás em Resíduos Sólidos Urbanos. Recife, Brasil: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; 2008.
[34] Fernández Rodríguez J, Pérez M, Romero LI. Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: Optimisation of the semicontinuous process. Chem Eng J. 2012;193–194:10-5.
[35] Ağdağ ON, Sponza DT. Co-digestion of mixed industrial sludge with municipal solid wastes in anaerobic simulated landfilling bioreactors. J Hazard Mater. 2007;140(1):75-85.
[36] Lee DH, Behera SK, Kim JW, Park H-S. Methane production potential of leachate generated from Korean food waste recycling facilities: a lab-scale study. Waste Manage. 2009;29(2):876-82.
[37] Prabhudessai V, Ganguly A, Mutnuri S. Biochemical methane potential of agro wastes. J Energy. 2013:1-7.
[38] Koch K, Fernández YB, Drewes JE. Influence of headspace flushing on methane production in Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) tests. Bioresour. Technol. 2015;186:173-8.
[39] Valcke D, Verstraete W. A practical method to estimate the acetoclastic methanogenic biomass in anaerobic sludges. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1983;55(9):1191-5.
[40] Penna JA. Estudo da metodologia do teste de atividade metanogênica específica. Sao Paulo, Brasil: Universidade de Sao Paulo. Escola de Engenharia de Sao Carlos; 1994.
[41] Castorena H, Robles M, Rojas M, Robles R. Estudio Comparativo del aceite de aguacate y ácidos grasos utilizando espectroscopia infrarroja. En: IV Congreso Internacional XV Congreso Nacional de Ingeniería Bioquímica; 2012 abr 4-7; Morelia Mich, México: Instituto Politécnico Nacional CIBA-Tlaxcala; 2012.
[42] Giménez JB, Martí N, Ferrer J, Seco A. Methane recovery efficiency in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAnMBR) treating sulphate-rich urban wastewater: Evaluation of methane losses with the effluent. Bioresoruce Technol. 2012;118:67-72.
[43] Schievano A, Pognani M, D’Imporzano G, Adani F. Predicting anaerobic biogasification potential of ingestates and digestates of a full-scale biogas plant using chemical and biological parameters. Bioresour. Technol. 2008;99(17):8112-7.
[44] Ventura C. Productividad de metano a partir de residuos de cultivo de maíz y frijol. San Antonio de Oriente, Honduras: Escuela Agrícola Panamericana, Zamorano; 2014.
[45] Angelidaki I, Sanders W. Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants. Rev Enviromen Sci BioTechnol. 2004;3(2):117-29.
[46] Strömberg S, Nistor M, Liu J. Towards eliminating systematic errors caused by the experimental conditions in Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) tests. Waste Manage. 2014;34(11):1939-48.
[47] Lopes WS, Leite VD, Prasad S. Influence of inoculum on performance of anaerobic reactors for treating municipal solid waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2004;94(3):261-6.
[48] Strömberg S, Nistor M, Liu J. Early prediction of Biochemical Methane Potential through statistical and kinetic modelling of initial gas production. Bioresour. Technol. 2015;176:233-41.
[2] Owen WF, Stuckey DC, Healy Jr JB, Young LY, McCarty PL. Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Res. 1979;13(6):485-92.
[3] Esposito G, Frunzo L, Liotta F, Panico A, Pirozzi F. Bio-methane potential tests to measure the biogas production from the digestion and co-digestion of complex organic substrates. Open Environ Engine J. 2012;5:1-8.
[4] Hansen TL, Schmidt JE, Angelidaki I, Marca E, la Cour Jansen J, Mosbæk H, et al. Method for determination of methane potentials of solid organic waste. Waste Manage. 2004;24(4):393-400.
[5] Chynoweth D, Turick C, Owens J, Jerger D, Peck M. Biochemical methane potential of biomass and waste feedstocks. Biomass Bioenerg. 1993;5(1):95-111.
[6] VDI. 4630. Fermentation of organic materials. Characterisation of the substrate, sampling, collection of material data, fermentation tests. Alemania: Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, 2006.
[7] Angelidaki I, Alves M, Bolzonella D, Borzacconi L, Campos JL, Guwy AJ, et al. Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: A proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci. Technol. 2009;59:927-34.
[8] Gould MC. Bioenergy and Anaerobic Digestion. En: Bioenergy. Dahiya A, Editor. USA: Academic Press; 2014. p.297-317.
[9] Li YY, Gadow S, Niu Q. Biomass energy using methane and hydrogen from waste materials. En: Topical Themes in Energy and Resources. Tanaka Y, Norton M, Li Y, Editors. Japan: Springer Japan; 2015. p.131-57.
[10] Torres P. Perspectivas del tratamiento anaerobio de aguas residuales domésticas en países en desarrollo. Revista EIA. 2012;9(18):115-29.
[11] Zhang XJ. Anaerobic Process. En: Comprehensive Water Quality and Purification. Ahuja S, Editor. USA: Elsevier Inc; 2014. p. 108-122.
[12] Lesteur M, Bellon-Maurel V, Gonzalez C, Latrille E, Roger JM, Junqua G, et al. Alternative methods for determining anaerobic biodegradability: a review. Process Biochem. 2010;45:431-40.
[13] Buffiere P, Loisel D, Bernet N, Delgenes J. Towards new indicators for the prediction of solid waste anaerobic digestion properties. Water Sci. Technol. 2006;53(8):233-41.
[14] Esposito G, Frunzo L, Liotta F, Panico A, Pirozzi F. Bio-methane potential tests to measure the biogas production from the digestion and co-digestion of complex organic substrates. Open Environ Engine J. 2012;5:1-8.
[15] Lisboa MS, Lansing S. Characterizing food waste substrates for co-digestion through biochemical methane potential (BMP) experiments. Waste Manage. 2013;33(12):2664-9.
[16] Raposo F, Fernández-Cegrí V, de la Rubia MA, Borja R, Béline F, Cavinato C, et al. Biochemical methane potential (BMP) of solid organic substrates: Evaluation of anaerobic biodegradability using data from an international interlaboratory study. J Chem Technol Biot. 2011;86(8):1088-98.
[17] Raposo F, De La Rubia MA, Fernández-Cegrí V, Borja R. Anaerobic digestion of solid organic substrates in batch mode: An overview relating to methane yields and experimental procedures. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2012;16(1):861-77.
[18] Neves L, Oliveira R, Alves MM. Influence of inoculum activity on the bio-methanization of a kitchen waste under different waste/inoculum ratios. Process Biochem. 2004;39:2019-24.
[19] Neves L, Ferreira R, Oliveira R, Alves MM. Influence of inocculum acclimation in the biodegradation rate and estimated biodegradability of cow manure, food waste and oil. Environ Eng Manag J. 2010;9:327-34.
[20] Aquino SF, Chernicharo CA, Foresti E, Santos MLF, Monteggia LO. Metodologias para determinação da atividade metanogênica específica (AME) em lodos anaeróbios. Eng sanit ambient. 2007;12(2):192-201.
[21] Torres P, Pérez A. Actividad Metanogénica Específica: Una herramienta de control y optimización de sistemas de tratamiento anaerobio de aguas residuales. Ingeniería de los Recursos Naturales y del Ambiente. 2010;(9):5-14.
[22] Raposo F, Banks CJ, Siegert I, Heaven S, Borja R. Influence of inoculum to substrate ratio on the biochemical methane potential of maize in batch tests. Process Biochem. 2006;41:1444-50.
[23] Sabry T. Application of the UASB inoculated with flocculent and granular sludge in treating sewage at different hydraulic shock loads.Bioresource Technol. 2008;99(10):4073-4077.
[24] Kuan-Yeow S, Duu-Jong L, Yuegen Y. Anaerobic granulation for wastewater treatment and bioenergy production: Advances and Prospects. En: Handbook of Clean Energy Systems. Jinyue Y, Editor. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Son Ltd; 2015. p. 1834.
[25] Ossa M, Fuentes L. Evaluación de inóculos procedentes de PTAR ́s municipales sobre la digestión anaerobia de la fracción orgánica de residuos sólidos municipales (trabajo de grado). Cali, Colombia: Universidad del Valle; 2015.
[26] Diaz BMC, Espitia VSE, Molina PF. Digestión Anaerobia: una aproximación a la tecnología. Colombia: Unilibros; 2002.
[27] Monteggia L. Proposta de metodologia para avaliação do parâmetro Atividade Metanogênica Específica. Em: 19º Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, ABES; 1997 Set 14-19; Foz do Iguaçu, Brasil: Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental (ABES); 1997. p. 754-66.
[28] Rozzi A, Remigi E. Methods of assessing microbial activity and inhibition under anaerobic conditions: a literature review. Reviews in Environmen Sci Bio/Technol. 2004;3(2):93-115.
[29] Souto TF, Aquino SF, Silva QS, Chernicharo LCA. Influence of incubation conditions on the specific methanogenic activity test. Biodegradation. 2010;21:411-24.
[30] Ortiz J. Puesta a punto de una metodología para la determinación de la actividad metanogénica específica de un fango anaerobio mediante el sistema OxiTop®. Influencia de las principales variables experimentales (Tesis doctoral). Valencia, España: Universidad Politecnica de Valencia; 2011.
[31] De la Rubia M, Fernández-Cegrí V, Raposo F, Borja R. Influence of particle size and chemical composition on the performance and kinetics of anaerobic digestion process of sunflower oil cake in batch mode. Biochem Eng J. 2011;58:162-7.
[32] Labatut RA, Angenent LT, Scott NR. Biochemical methane potential and biodegradability of complex organic substrates. Bioresour. Technol. 2011;102(3):2255-64.
[33] Alves I. Análise Experimental do Potencial de Geração de Biogás em Resíduos Sólidos Urbanos. Recife, Brasil: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; 2008.
[34] Fernández Rodríguez J, Pérez M, Romero LI. Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: Optimisation of the semicontinuous process. Chem Eng J. 2012;193–194:10-5.
[35] Ağdağ ON, Sponza DT. Co-digestion of mixed industrial sludge with municipal solid wastes in anaerobic simulated landfilling bioreactors. J Hazard Mater. 2007;140(1):75-85.
[36] Lee DH, Behera SK, Kim JW, Park H-S. Methane production potential of leachate generated from Korean food waste recycling facilities: a lab-scale study. Waste Manage. 2009;29(2):876-82.
[37] Prabhudessai V, Ganguly A, Mutnuri S. Biochemical methane potential of agro wastes. J Energy. 2013:1-7.
[38] Koch K, Fernández YB, Drewes JE. Influence of headspace flushing on methane production in Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) tests. Bioresour. Technol. 2015;186:173-8.
[39] Valcke D, Verstraete W. A practical method to estimate the acetoclastic methanogenic biomass in anaerobic sludges. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1983;55(9):1191-5.
[40] Penna JA. Estudo da metodologia do teste de atividade metanogênica específica. Sao Paulo, Brasil: Universidade de Sao Paulo. Escola de Engenharia de Sao Carlos; 1994.
[41] Castorena H, Robles M, Rojas M, Robles R. Estudio Comparativo del aceite de aguacate y ácidos grasos utilizando espectroscopia infrarroja. En: IV Congreso Internacional XV Congreso Nacional de Ingeniería Bioquímica; 2012 abr 4-7; Morelia Mich, México: Instituto Politécnico Nacional CIBA-Tlaxcala; 2012.
[42] Giménez JB, Martí N, Ferrer J, Seco A. Methane recovery efficiency in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAnMBR) treating sulphate-rich urban wastewater: Evaluation of methane losses with the effluent. Bioresoruce Technol. 2012;118:67-72.
[43] Schievano A, Pognani M, D’Imporzano G, Adani F. Predicting anaerobic biogasification potential of ingestates and digestates of a full-scale biogas plant using chemical and biological parameters. Bioresour. Technol. 2008;99(17):8112-7.
[44] Ventura C. Productividad de metano a partir de residuos de cultivo de maíz y frijol. San Antonio de Oriente, Honduras: Escuela Agrícola Panamericana, Zamorano; 2014.
[45] Angelidaki I, Sanders W. Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants. Rev Enviromen Sci BioTechnol. 2004;3(2):117-29.
[46] Strömberg S, Nistor M, Liu J. Towards eliminating systematic errors caused by the experimental conditions in Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) tests. Waste Manage. 2014;34(11):1939-48.
[47] Lopes WS, Leite VD, Prasad S. Influence of inoculum on performance of anaerobic reactors for treating municipal solid waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2004;94(3):261-6.
[48] Strömberg S, Nistor M, Liu J. Early prediction of Biochemical Methane Potential through statistical and kinetic modelling of initial gas production. Bioresour. Technol. 2015;176:233-41.