Vol. 20 No. 1 (2021): Revista Filosofía UIS
Articles

Philosophical Contributions to a Women’s Agenda and Peace Building in Colombia

Catalina López Gómez
Universidad de La Salle, Colombia
Hernando Arturo Estévez Cuervo
Universidad de La Salle, Colombia

Published 2021-01-01

Keywords

  • peace in Colombia,
  • posconflict,
  • Irigaray,
  • gender,
  • difference

How to Cite

López Gómez, C., & Estévez Cuervo, H. A. (2021). Philosophical Contributions to a Women’s Agenda and Peace Building in Colombia. Revista Filosofía UIS, 20(1), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.18273/revfil.v20n1-2021006

Abstract

The peace agreement concluded between the Colombian government and the FARC in 2016 has been seen not only as the end of the armed conflict, but also as the possibility of imagining and building an inclusive, fair and participatory society. It has been argued that the peace agreements are the shortest route to achieve the objectives of the State and comply with what is stipulated in its narrative as part of a social pact that leads to peaceful coexistence. However, a detailed and critical look at the descriptive and therefore practical framework of the agreements from a feminist perspective focused on difference, reveals an intentional sense of exclusion and marginalization of women that reproduces the theoretical frameworks of a feminism focused on equality and equity. Luce Irigaray's philosophical thinking allows fracturing and decentralizing the masculine logic in the Western philosophical tradition and opens the way for difference as a concept that recreates and reimagines the public and political space as a possibility for inclusion that strengthens citizenship as a right and sole guarantor of reconciliation in Colombian society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bermúdez, A. (Ed.). (2018). Los debates de la Habana. Una mirada desde adentro. IFIT.
  2. Biblioteca del Proceso de Paz con las FARC-EP (2018). Tomo VIII. De la Refrendación al Acuerdo del Colón. Presidencia de la República, Oficina del Alto Comisionado para la Paz.
  3. Bostic, H. (2002). Reading and Rethinking the Subject in Luce Irigaray's Recent Work. Paragraph, 25(3), 22-31. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43263693
  4. Boulding, E. (2000). Cultures of Peace. The Hidden Side of History. Syracuse University Press.
  5. Boutros, G. (1992). An Agenda for Peace: Preventive Diplomacy, peacemaking and Peacekeeping. ONU (A/47/277-S/24111).
  6. Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. Columbia University Press.
  7. Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica [CNMH] (2017). La guerra inscrita en el cuerpo. Informe nacional de violencia sexual en el conflicto armado. CNMH.
  8. Ciurlizza, J. (2012). Justicia transicional en Colombia: un modelo para desarmar. En Rettberg, A. (Comp). Construcción de paz en Colombia. (pp. 89-116). Universidad de los Andes.
  9. Constitución Política de Colombia (1991). [Const] (2.a ed.). Legis.
  10. Davenport, Ch., Melander, E., & Regan, P. (2018). The Peace Continuum. What It Is and How to Study It. Oxford University Press.
  11. De la Calle, H. (24 de julio de 2016). Humberto de la Calle habla sobre la inclusión del enfoque de género en los acuerdos de paz [video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SG8X50uyz2w
  12. Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by peaceful means. PRIO y SAGE.
  13. Irigaray, L. (1985a). Speculum of the Other Woman. Cornell University Press.
  14. Irigaray, L. (1985b). This sex which is not one. Cornell University Press.
  15. Irigaray, L. (1989). The Gesture in Psychoanalysis. En T. Brennan (Ed.). Between Feminism and Psychoanalysis (pp. 127-138). Routledge.
  16. Irigaray, L. (1991). The Poverty of Psychoanalysis. En M. Whitford (Ed.). The Irigaray Reader (p. 79-104). Blackwell.
  17. Irigaray, L. (1993). Sexes and Genealogies. Columbia University Press.
  18. Irigaray, L. (1994). The Essential Difference. Indiana University Press.
  19. Irigaray, L. (2000). Thinking the difference. The Athlone Press.
  20. Irigaray, L. & Lotringer, S. (2000). Why Different? A Culture of Two Subjects. The MIT Press.
  21. Irigaray, L. ( 2001). Democracy Begins between Two. Routledge.
  22. Mazzoldi, G., Cuesta, I. & Álvarez V. E. (15 de octubre de 2016). La “ideología de género”: ¿un spoiler para la paz? Open Democracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/democraciaabierta/g-nica-mazzoldi-irina-cuesta/la-ideolog-de-g-nero-un-spoiler-para-la-paz
  23. Lederach, J. P. (2016). La imaginación moral. El arte y el alma de construir la paz. Publicaciones Semana.
  24. Palou, J. y Méndez, M. (2012). Balance de los procesos de desarme, desmovilización y reintegración (DDR) en Colombia: 1990-2011. En Rettberg, A (Comp). Construcción de paz en Colombia (pp. 349-382). Universidad de los Andes.
  25. Presidencia de la República de Colombia & FARC-EP. (2016). Acuerdo Final para la terminación del conflicto y la construcción de una paz estable y duradera. https://www.cancilleria.gov.co/sites/default/files/Fotos2016/12.11_1.2016nuevoacuerdofinal.pdf
  26. Registraduría Nacional del Estado Civil (2016). Plebiscito 2 de octubre 2016. Preconteo Plebiscito. https://elecciones.registraduria.gov.co/pre_plebis_2016/99PL/DPLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ_L1.htm
  27. Villamizar, H. D. (2017) Las guerrillas en Colombia: una historia desde los orígenes hasta los confines. Random House.