The Problem of the Counterfactuals in the Davidson's Semantics
Published 2021-06-11
Keywords
- action,
- counterfactual,
- circumstance,
- semantics,
- content
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Filosofía UIS
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
I discuss Davidson´s semantics of action sentences to argue that it doesn´t have enough elements to deal with counterfactuals. I propose two criticisms. In the first one, I argue that due to the author´s ontology regarding actions, it is impossible to consider the same actions in counterfactuals circumstances. In the second, I claim that the descriptive character of the actions sentences prevent that one speaker can extrapolate the Davidson´s semantics from sentences that he knows to counterfactual actions sentences.
Downloads
References
- Climo, T. A. y Howells, P. G. A. (1976). Possible worlds in historical explanation. History and Theory, 15(1), 1-20.
- Davidson, D. (1995). Ensayos sobre acciones y sucesos. (O. Hansberg, J. A. Robles y M. Valdés, trad.). Crítica.
- Davidson, D. (2001). De la verdad y de la interpretación. Fundamentales contribuciones a la filosofía del lenguaje. Gedisa.
- Davidson, D. (2004). Problems in the Explanation of Action. En Problems of Rationality (pp. 101-117 ). Clarendon Press.
- Foster, J. (1976). Meaning and Truth Theory. En J. McDowell & Gareth Evans (Eds.), Truth and Meaning (pp. 1-32). Clarendon Press.
- Martínez-Freire, P. F. (2000). La teoría de la verdad de Alfred Tarski. Contrastes. Revista interdisciplinar de filosofía, 97-109.
- Steward, H. (1997). The Ontology of Mind. Events, Processes, and States. Clarendon Press.
- Steward, H. (2012). Actions as Processes. Philosophical Perspectives, 26 (1), 373-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12008
- Tarski, A. (2005). La concepción semántica de la verdad y los fundamentos de la semántica. En L. Valdés Villabuena (Comp.), La búsqueda del significado. Lecturas de filosofía del lenguaje (pp. 299-336). Tecnos.