Vol. 9 No. 2 (2010): Revista Filosofía UIS
Research Article

Déconcert: a post-derridian philosophy

Manas Roy
Universidad de Assam, India.
Bio

Published 2010-12-14

Keywords

  • Photö,
  • Photösyntagmatics,
  • Photö-Dynamics,
  • Photö-Vita

How to Cite

Roy, M. (2010). Déconcert: a post-derridian philosophy. Revista Filosofía UIS, 9(2), 11–26. Retrieved from https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/1591

Abstract

In the ‘Photosynthesis’ mechanism where tree leaves receive and prepare their food materials through sunlight. We may find it the same as in all Literature. While they receive their subjective food materials in the form of new literal ideas only through this everlasting Husserlian mechanism of ‘epoché’ or, it’s “Photö-mechanism”— the kind dynamism of ‘epoché’— the “Photö-Dynamics (PD)”. In researching Edmund Husserl’s everlasting notion ‘epoché’ through Pheno→Photö→Word→Art concertment, one can re-discover so many new dimensional lights towards manifestation one of a new Phenomenology→Déconstruction→Déconcert dimension. ‘Déconcert’ from philosophical feature, may be explained as: “The theory of culturing syntagms by ‘photö-dynamics’ (PD), by concerting themselves with suitable literature(s), making and plying all at a time”. “Concerting Deconstruction” is only an effort towards exploration of the resultant-metaphysics of Derrida’s Philosophy of Déconstruction in the present era. Above all it’s an effort towards, the re-thinking of Husserl’s Phenomenology more scientifically after Derrida’s Deconstruction; and opening-up of new Déconcertic dimensions—. One of new kind dimension may be presented as “Photö-Phenomenology”; as a new branch of “Phenomenology” under Concertive Humanities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Derrida, Jacques (1973). Speech and Phenomena, and Other Essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs, trans. by David B. Allison. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
  2. Derrida, Jacques (1976). Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  3. Dreyfus, Hubert (1982) Husserl, Intentionality, and Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  4. Dreyfus, Hubert & Rabinow, Paul (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Chicago: the University of Chicago Press, USA. Drummond, John “Noema and Meaning in Husserl,” Phenomenology and Philosophical Research, 50: 263-271.
  5. Husserl, Edmund (1931). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Translated by- Gibson, WRB. New York: MacMillan Co.
  6. Kolakowski, Leszek (1987). Husserl and the Search for Certitude, Cgicago: University of Chicago Press.
  7. Lawlor, Leonard (2004) Derrida and Husserl: The Basic Problem of Phenomenology in: The Review of Metaphysics, Vol.57.
  8. Norris, Christopher (1982). Deconstruction: Theory and Practice, London: Methven, 1982.
  9. Roudinesco, Elizabeth (2004). For What Tomorrow. A Dialogue with Jacques Derrida, Palo Alto: Stanford. University Press
  10. Roy, Manas (2008). “Derrida’s Philosophical Déconstruction”, Transcendent Philosophy Journal, Vol.9, Dec.2008 (237-246). Disponible en: http://iranianstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ Trans-Phil-Vol9-Dec-2008.pdf
  11. Roy, Manas (2010a). Concerting Déconstruction, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, U.K. http://www.c-s-p.org/Flyers/ Concerting-Deconstruction1-4438-2285-X.htm
  12. Roy, Manas (2010b). Phenomenological Existentialism, THINK, Vol.9, Issue 24, pp 51-63, Published by: The Royal Institute of Philosophy; Cambridge University Press, U.K. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=7191848&jid=THI&volumeId=9&issueId=24&aid=7191840
  13. Roy, Manas (2011). Concertölogy: The new Philosophy, Cambridge Sholars Publishing: Cambridge.
  14. Schütz, Alfred (1966). “The Problem of Transcendental Intersubjectivity in Husserl,” in Collected Papers III, The Hague: Nijhoff.
  15. Stephen W. Hawking (1992). A Brief History Of Time. Great Britain: Bantam Press.
  16. Stephen W. Hawking (1992). The Theory Of Everything. Phoenix Books.
  17. Stiegler, Bernard (2002). “Derrida and Technology: Fidelity at the Limits of Deconstruction and the Prosthesis of Faith,” in Tom Cohen (ed.), Jacques Derrida and the Humanities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Ströker, Elisabeth (1993). Husserl’s Transcendental Phenomenology, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  19. Thomas, Michael (2006). The Reception of Derrida: Translation and Transformation.