Vacuous terms: genesis and meaning

Abstract

In this paper, I adhere to the theory of direct reference of meaning. I hold that the meaning of a name is its bearer and that this bearer is not necessarily a spacio-temporal entity. I will argue that meaning of a vague term is inevitably binded to its roots, and that this takes us to a classification of two kinds of vague terms: vague terms "of belief" and "of human activities". From this, I will show that the sentences that contain these terms do not lack of truth value. I will differentiate this proposal from the analysis made by Saul Kripke in respect to fictional terms. I will conclude arguing that the ontological commitment arising from this account is much favorable the ones assumed by other theories.