Without lack, without deprivation, without fault. Deleuzian indications for a critique of the concept of necessity

Abstract

The concept of necessity can be considered as one of the central points in the debate around conceptions of the human. Under this condition, and taking into account the fact that the usual meaning of the notion of "human necessity" derives from the understanding of desire in terms of lack, the proposal of the present article is to critically review the notion of "necessity" starting from the non-lacking conception of desire developed by Deleuze and Guattari in Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia and, correlatively, advance in the formulation of a conception of it lacking lack, deprived of deprivation and missing the fault.