Vol. 10 No. 2 (2011): Revista Filosofía UIS
Research Article

The roots of the political concept of “action” in Hannah Arendt: a reconstructive interpretation of the practical model of Aristotle

Catalina Barrio
Universidad Nacional de Lanús
Bio

Published 2011-10-10

Keywords

  • ethics,
  • action,
  • phronesis,
  • judgement

How to Cite

Barrio, C. (2011). The roots of the political concept of “action” in Hannah Arendt: a reconstructive interpretation of the practical model of Aristotle. Revista Filosofía UIS, 10(2), 177–190. Retrieved from https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/2850

Abstract

From the action concept, Arendt resorts to political the aristotelian ideas as as much ethical to base a theory of the action. The perspective of some modern ones that considers to the individual outside their practical and reflective sphere has lead consequences nonwished that they have been visible in the contemporary societies (like for example the totalitarianisms, etc.). One considers in this one work, a shift of paradigm: to think to the individual other people's to its historicidad and its particular situation to think it as political ethical agent with responsibility within the frame of a theory of the action.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Arendt, Hannah (2002). La vida del espíritu, Barcelona: Paidós.
  2. Arendt, Hannah (2008). La condición humana, Barcelona: Paidós.
  3. Arendt, Hannah (2009). Conferencias sobre la filosofía política de Kant, Buenos Aires: Paidós.
  4. Aristóteles (1997). Política, Barcelona: Altaya.
  5. Aristóteles (2000), Ética nicomáquea, Madrid: Gredos.
  6. Benhabib, Seyla (1988). Judgment and the Moral Fundations of Politics in Arendt’s Thought, Harvard: Political Theory.
  7. Benhabib, Seyla (2003). The Recluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  8. Fonnegra Osorio, Claudia Patricia (2006). “Hannah Arendt. El juicio y la acción”, En: Revista Co-herencia, Vol. 3, N.° 5, Medellín: Universidad Eafit, pp. 203-219.
  9. Habermas, Jürgen (2000). Perfiles filosófico-políticos, México: Taurus.
  10. Lara, María Pía (2009). Narrar el mal. Una teoría posmetafísica del juicio reflexionante, Barcelona: Gedisa.
  11. Prior Olmos, Ángel (2009). Voluntad y responsabilidad en Hannah Arendt, Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
  12. Volpi, Franco (1999). “Rehabilitación de la filosofía práctica y neo-aristotelismo”, Revista Anuario filosófico, N.° 33, Navarra: Universidad de Navarra, pp. 315-342.