Vol. 11 No. 1 (2012): Revista Filosofía UIS
Research Article

Wittgenstein: pillar of philosophy of language

Claudio Ramírez Angarita
Universidad La Gran Colombia.
Bio
Edgar Fernando Chacón Díaz
Sena sede Bogotá.
Bio

Published 2012-06-13

Keywords

  • analytical,
  • paradigm,
  • language,
  • philosophy,
  • linguistic turn

How to Cite

Ramírez Angarita, C., & Chacón Díaz, E. F. (2012). Wittgenstein: pillar of philosophy of language. Revista Filosofía UIS, 11(1), 253–268. Retrieved from https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/3173

Abstract

This text revolves around an interest in making a tour of the analytic philosophical thought in Wittgenstein, who is considered by many the most important philosopher of modern times, as the role model in the Philosophy of Language. The central consideration that explains his work not only found in what will be called the paradigm of language in philosophy, but because it is in the highest degree that constitutes the core of the movement of a formal version.

With studies like these are powerful wanted to become like Kant and which can be seen in Hegel, self-conscious of our condition. The purpose of this text is then analyzed and interpreted in a concrete and illustrative positions of Austrian author.

It is worth making a contextualization of the philosophy of language, which is divided into the philosophy of language as a branch of philosophy and philosophy of language as a philosophical paradigm that was introduced in the twentieth century. In addition, we want to summarize the highlights of that which is known as Wittgenstein’s philosophy of language his statements, proposals and studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Auroux, S. (1996). La Filosofía del lenguaje. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  2. Bernal, J. (1983). “Algunas ideas de Aristóteles sobre el lenguaje”. En: revistaThesaurus, número 3.
  3. Fonseca, M. (2007). Discurso sobre los límites del lenguaje. Bogotá: Universidad Santo Tomás.
  4. Habermas, J. (2002). Verdad y justificación. Madrid: Trotta.
  5. Hobbes, T. (2001). Leviathan, o la materia, forma y poder de una República Eclesiástica y Civil. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  6. Korta, K. (2002). “Hacer Filosofía del Lenguaje”, En: Revista de Filosofía, volumen 27, (2), pp.337-359.
  7. Meza, M. (2003). El concepto de identidad personal en David Hume. Bogotá: Uniandes.
  8. Rodríguez, C. (2002). La filosofía analítica en Colombia. Bogotá: El Búho.
  9. Rorty, R. (1990). “El giro lingüístico: dificultades metafilosóficas de la filosofía lingüística”. En: El giro Lingüístico. Barcelona. Paidós.
  10. Wittgenstein, L. (1982). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Madrid: Alianza.
  11. Wittgenstein, L. (1994). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Barcelona: Altaya.
  12. Wittgenstein, L. (2008). Investigaciones filosóficas. Barcelona: Crítica.