Revista UIS Ingenierías

Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023): Revista UIS Ingenierías
Articles

Determination of the sustainable added value in the supply chain processes

PDF (Español (España))
  • Andrey Vinajera-Zamora,
  • Roberto Cespón-Castro ,
  • Fernando Marrero-Delgado
Andrey Vinajera-Zamora
Universidad Central Marta Abreu de Las Villas
Roberto Cespón-Castro
Universidad Central Marta Abreu de Las Villas
Fernando Marrero-Delgado
Universidad Central Marta Abreu de Las Villas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18273/revuin.v22n1-2023004

Published 2023-01-05

Keywords

  • Sustainable Value Added,
  • Economic Value Added,
  • Environmental Value Added,
  • Data Envelopment Analysis,
  • process management,
  • supply chain management,
  • SCOR model
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Vinajera-Zamora, A., Cespón-Castro , R. ., & Marrero-Delgado , F. . (2023). Determination of the sustainable added value in the supply chain processes. Revista UIS Ingenierías, 22(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.18273/revuin.v22n1-2023004

Copyright (c) 2023 Revista UIS Ingenierías

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This article proposes a methodology to calculate the sustainable added value of the processes (SVA) that form a supply chain (CS), through a comprehensive indicator. The methodology consists of six steps and uses as methods the Life Cycle Analysis and the methods of Diakoulaki and Saaty, based on multiple criteria. When applied to a CS of electromechanical products, it was possible to obtain the SVA of each process and with it the value that each one contributes to the economic and environmental dimensions of sustainability. These results demonstrate the novelty and feasibility of applying the developed methodology and its differences with other existing ones in the specialized literature.

PDF (Español (España))

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. R. P. Wells, “Why we need value-added environmental management,” Environmental Quality Management, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1–4, 1995, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310040402
  2. H. P. Bulsara, M. Qureshi, H. Patel, “Green supply chain performance measurement: an exploratory study,” International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 476–498, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2016.075210
  3. O. Guarín-Villamizar, “Metodología para evaluación de la condición ambiental en microcuencas urbanas,” Revista UIS Ingenierías, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 141–149, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.18273/revuin.v16n2-2017013
  4. R. S. Kaplan, D. P. Norton, “Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part 1,” Accounting horizons, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 87–104, 2001.
  5. G. A. O. Pinto, G. O. Plata, “Desarrollo sostenible en edificaciones,” Revista UIS Ingenierías, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 103–121, 2010.
  6. T. J. Fontalvo-Herrera, J. Morelos-Gómez, A. Mendoza-Mendoza, “Incidencia de la certificación iso 9001 en los indicadores de productividad y rentabilidad en empresas de zona franca–barranquilla mediante análisis discriminante,” Revista UIS Ingenierías, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 215–225, 2012.
  7. C. A. Moreno-Camachoa, J. R. Montoya-Torresa , A. Jaegler, N. Gondran, “Sustainability Metrics for Real Case Applications of the Supply Chain Network Design Problem: A Systematic Literature Review,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 164, pp. 180–195, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.278
  8. R. Clift, L. Wright, “Relationships between environmental impacts and added value along the supply chain,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 281–295, 2000, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00055-4
  9. F. Figge, T. Hahn, Sustainable value added: measuring corporate sustainable performance beyond eco-efficiency. CSM, 2002.
  10. F. Figge, T.s Hahn, “Sustainable value added-measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency,” Ecological Economics, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 173–187, 2004, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.08.005
  11. T. Hahn, F. Figge, R. Barkemeyer, “Sustainable value creation among companies in the manufacturing sector,” International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, vol. 7, no. 56, pp. 496–512, 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJETM.2007.015627
  12. J. Straková, “Are manufacturing companies improving their sustainable value added?” Ekonomická Revue - Central European Review of Economic Issues, vol. 15, no. 2012, pp. 225–236, 2012.
  13. J. Straková, “Sustainable value added of top european pharmaceutical manufacturers,” Trends Economics and Management, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 80–89, 2013.
  14. E. Kassem, O. Trenz, J. Hrebícek, O. Faldík, “Sustainability assessment using sustainable value added,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 220, pp. 177–183, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.482
  15. J. Straková et al., “Sustainable value added as we do not know it,” Business: Theory and Practice, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 168–173, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2015.453
  16. T. Kuosmanen, N. Kuosmanen, “How not to measure sustainable value (and how one might),” Ecological Economics, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 235–243, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.008
  17. A. Bassi, G. Vincenti, “Toward a new metrics for the evaluation of the social added value of social enterprises,” CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, no. 83, pp. 9–42, 2015.
  18. C. Carrascosa-López, M.-d.-V. Segarra-Oña, Á. Peiró-Signes, L. Miret-Pastor, and B. Segura-García-del Río, Is It Possible To Generate Added Value Through A Higher Environmental Proactivity Orientation? A Practical Analysis of the Spanish Ceramic Industry. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 57–71, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23553-5_4
  19. B. Fries, “Sustainability Assessment via Sustainable Value Added and Composite Sustainable Development Index on the Example of Petroleum Majors,” SPE Americas E&P Environmental and Safety Conference, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/120572-MS
  20. A. Moharamkhani, A. Bozorgi-Amiri, and H. Mina, “Supply chain performance measurement using scor model based on intervalvalued fuzzy topsis,” International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 115–132, 2017.
  21. M. E. Porter, “Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy,” Economic development quarterly, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 15–34, 2000.
  22. J. E. Yumisaca Tuquinga, E. A. Bohórquez Armijos, E. A. Mendoza Tarabó, J. Gonzabay Rosales, “Cadena de valor del destino Dos Mangas como herramienta para el análisis de la sostenibilidad de la oferta turística,” Revista Universidad y Sociedad, vol. 12, pp. 88 – 96, 02 2020.
  23. S. A. C. González, L. C. B. Romero, O. A. Fránquez, B. L. Martínez, “La cadena de valor vs cadena de suministro en el café para generar una ventaja competitiva,” Ulü, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 96–116, 2020.
  24. D. C. Moreno, G. E. Grimaldo, M. C. Salamanca, “El mapa de la cadena de valor como herramienta de diagnóstico de sistemas productivos. caso: línea de producción láctea,” Revista Espacios, vol. 39, no. 03, 2018.
  25. J. I. Pulido-Fernández, Y. López-Sánchez, “La cadena de valor del destino como herramienta innovadora para el análisis de la sostenibilidad de las políticas turísticas. el caso de España,” Innovar, vol. 26, no. 59, pp. 155–176, 2016, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v26n59.54369
  26. A. Díaz-Víquez, A. Pérez-Hernández, J. Hernández-Ávila, G. Casto-García, “Impacto de la cadena de valor en el margen de utilidad bruta en la producción de destilados de agave,” Revista mexicana de Agronegocios, vol. 40, no. 1345-2017-1407, pp. 551–560, 2017, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.261948
  27. J. Y. Tuquinga, E. M. Tarabó, J. G. Rosales, “La nueva ruralidad y el turismo, una alternativa de desarrollo sostenible en dos mangas, provincia de Santa Elena.” Revista Científica y Tecnológica UPSE, vol. 4, no. 2, 2017.
  28. A. J. Rubio-Montero, A. Alberto-Morillas, R. D. L. Herrera-Insua, P. Colino-Sanguino, J. Blanco-Yagüe, M. Giménez, F. BlancoMarcilla, E. Montes-Prado, A. Acero, and R. Mayo-García, “Evolution of the maintainability of hpc facilities at ciemat headquarters,” Revista UIS Ingenierías, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 85–88, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.18273/revuin.v19n2-2020009
  29. C. E. Aristizabal-Alzate, J. González-Manosalva, “Revisión de las medidas en pro de la eficiencia energética y la sostenibilidad de la industria del cemento a nivel mundial,” Revista UIS Ingenierías, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 91–110, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.18273/revuin.v20n3-2021006
  30. T. Hahn, J. Pinkse, L. Preuss, F. Figge, “Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 297–316, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5
  31. F. Figge, T. Hahn, “Sustainable value added–measuring corporate sustainable performance beyond eco-efficiency (centre for sustainability management, lüneburg),” Ecological Economics, 2002, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.08.005
  32. F. Figge, Sustainable value of European Industry: A Value Based Analysis of The Environmental Performance of European Manufacturing Companies. EU LIFE Environment, 2006.
  33. F. Figge, T. Hahn, “Sustainable value added: Ein neues maß des nachhaltigkeitsbeitrags von unternehmen am beispiel der henkel kgaa,” Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 126–141, 2004, https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.73.1.126
  34. F. Figge, T. Hahn, “Value drivers of corporate eco-efficiency: Management accounting information for the efficient use of environmental resources,” Management Accounting Research, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 387–400, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.06.009
  35. M. E. Porter, V. E. Millar et al., “How information gives you competitive advantage,” Harvard Business Review, 1985.
  36. R. J. Schonberger, “Measurement of lean value chains: efficiency and effectiveness,” in Modelling Value, pp. 65–75, 2012.
  37. M. A. Sellitto, G. M. Pereira, M. Borchardt, R. I. da Silva, C. V. Viegas, “A scor-based model for supply chain performance measurement: application in the footwear industry,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 53, no. 16, pp. 4917–4926, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1005251
  38. B. Ganji Jamehshooran, M. Shaharoun, H. Norehan Haron et al., “Assessing supply chain performance through applying the scor model,” International Journal of Supply Chain Management, vol. 4, no. 1, 2015.
  39. A. Charnes, W. Cooper, E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429–444, 1978, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  40. A. Vinajera-Zamora, F. Marrero-Delgado, M. Ruiz-Morales, “Método para calcular el valor agregado en cadenas de suministro de productos electromecánicos,” Ingeniare. Revista chilena de ingeniería, vol. 25, pp. 535 – 546, 09 2017.
  41. I. Vázquez-Rowe, D. Iribarren, M. T. Moreira, G. Feijoo, “Combined application of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis as a methodological approach for the assessment of fisheries,” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 272–283, 2010.
  42. Y. Barba-Gutiérrez, B. Adenso-Díaz, and S. Lozano, “Eco-efficiency of electric and electronic appliances: a data envelopment analysis (dea),” Environmental Modeling & Assessment, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 439–447, 2009.
  43. D. Xu, L. Lv, X. Ren, J. Ren, L. Dong, “Route selection for low-carbon ammonia production: A sustainability prioritization framework based-on the combined weights and projection ranking by similarity to referencing vector method,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 193, pp. 263–276, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.054
  44. R. Ginevicius, A. Ostapenko, “A quantitative evaluation of the company environment for the formation of its effective expansion strategy,” Intellectual Economics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 130–137, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intele.2016.02.004
  45. G. H. Tzeng, T. Y. Chen, J. C. Wang, “A weight-assessing method with habitual domains,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 342–367, 1998, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00246-4
  46. C. Benaim, J. Daurès, S. Petiot, J. Pélissier, “Management of multidimensional clinical scores: which solutions for items aggregation?,” Revue D’epidemiologie et de Sante Publique, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 559–569, 2001.
  47. V. Caballer Mellado, J. Aznar Bellver, “Multicriteria methodology applied to agrarian valuation,” Revista Española de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros (España), 2005.
  48. D. Diakoulaki, G. Mavrotas, L. Papayannakis, “Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 763–770, 1995, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
  49. J. Fuka, P. Lesakova, R. Bata, “Sustainable value as a tool for performance measurement of the region.” Lex Localis-Journal of Local SelfGovernment, vol. 16, no. 4, 2018.
  50. K. Rashid, R. Hameed, H. A. Ahmad, A. Razzaq, M. Ahmad, A. Mahmood, “Analytical framework for value added utilization of glass waste in concrete: Mechanical and environmental performance,” Waste Management, vol. 79, pp. 312–323, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.07.052
  51. J. P. Reyes, J. T. San-José, J. Cuadrado, R. Sancibrian, “Health and safety criteria for determining the sustainable value of construction projects,” Safety Science, vol. 62, pp. 221–232, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.08.023
  52. A. Vinajera-Zamora, F. Marrero-Delgado, R. Cespón-Castro, “Evaluación del desempeño de la cadena de suministro sostenible enfocada en procesos,” Estudios Gerenciales, vol. 36, no. 156, pp. 325–336, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2020.156.3699
  53. T. Saaty, “The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used,” Mathematical Modelling, vol. 9, 1980, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8