Vol. 15 No. 2 (2016): Revista UIS Ingenierías
Articles

Estimation of factors of penalty time in the function of generalized cost in Bucaramanga and its metropolitan area

Sandra Milena Cote Vargas
Universidad Industrial de Santander
Bio
Hernan Porras
UIS
Bio
Portada RUI 15.2

Published 2016-07-15

Keywords

  • Stated preference surveys,
  • generalized cost function,
  • discrete choice model,
  • demand modeling,
  • transportation planning

How to Cite

Cote Vargas, S. M., & Porras, H. (2016). Estimation of factors of penalty time in the function of generalized cost in Bucaramanga and its metropolitan area. Revista UIS Ingenierías, 15(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.18273/revuin.v15n2-2016012

Abstract

The travel time is a natural measure of the operation of a route or a transport system, where one of the main objectives is to transport people, cargo, goods, and services. The measure or factor by which people measure subjectively the effectiveness of the road or transportation system is the time it takes to travel, some elements such as the landscape, the environment, the availability of seats and others are elements responsible for providing a sense of comfort and help the user perception regarding the trip better, simpler routes also provide comfort feeling trip by the passenger, but its main goal is to reach as quickly as possible to your destiny.When a person takes a trip, the factor that is reviewed is the travel time, but also to make the programming of public transport routes should be incorporated to travel qualitative attributes such as comfort, safety, and prestige of the transport mode. That is the time value is usually higher in situations of congestion or where the traveler is not comfortable, so the author in his book Ortúzar Transportation Demand Models suggests that the cost of travel time The travel time is a natural measure of the operation of a route or a transport system, where one of the main objectives is to transport people, cargo, goods, and services. The measure or factor by which people measure subjectively the effectiveness of the road or transportation system is the time it takes to travel, some elements such as the landscape, the environment, the availability of seats and others are elements responsible for providing a sense of comfort and help the user perception regarding the trip better, simpler routes also provide comfort feeling trip by the passenger, but its main goal is to reach as quickly as possible to your destiny.When a person takes a trip, the factor that is reviewed is the travel time, but also to make the programming of public transport routes should be incorporated to travel qualitative attributes such as comfort, safety, and prestige of the transport mode. That is the time value is usually higher in situations of congestion or where the traveler is not comfortable, so the author in his book Ortúzar Transportation Demand Models suggests that the cost of travel time should be measured by travel segment. Some of the times that are considered are: the walking time to the whereabouts, the waiting time at the bus stop and the travel time on the bus (in this aspect should be considered if the bus is idle or not, this in to review the accommodations on the trip)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. J. D. D. Ortúzar, Modelos Econométricos De Elección Discreta, Santiago De Chile: Universidad Católica De Chile, 2000.
  2. J. D. D. Ortúzar, Modelos de demanda de transporte, México D.F.: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile - Alfaomega, 2000.
  3. C. Caliper, Travel demand modeling with transcad 4.8, Caliper: Caliper Corporation, 2005, p. 593.
  4. V. F. S. Ardila, Estimación de los factores de penalización del tiempo en la función de costo generalizado a bordo del sistema masivo transmilenio, Bogoá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2009, p. 249.
  5. Steer Davied Gleave & Hague Consulting Group, Marco Teorico adaptado de Stated Preference Techniques - A Guide To Practice, Australia: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
  6. J D. D. Ortuzar and C. Román, "El problema de la modelación de demanda desde una perspectiva desagregada: el codo del transporte," vol. XXIX, 2003, pp. 149-171.
  7. J. J. P. Sartori, "Diseño de encuestas de preferencias declaradas para la estimación del valor de los ahorros de tiempo y el pronóstico de la demanda de servicios de transporte urbano de pasajeros," salta, 2006.
  8. T. Litman, "Introduction to multi -modal transportation planning," Victoria Transport Policy Institute, p. 19, 2014.
  9. G. de Rus, J. Campos and G. Nombela, Economía del transporte, Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 2002.
  10. R. Cal y Mayor and J. Cardenas, Ingeniería del transito fundamentos y aplicaciones, Mexico: Alfaomega, 2007.
  11. S. D. d. Planeación, «Impacto económico de la movilidad en el distrito capital,» Bogotá,, 2008.
  12. I. M. d. Transporte, «MODELOS MATEMATICOS PARA DISTRIBUCION DE VIAJES,» Secretarua de Comunicaciones y Transportes, Querétano, 1991.
  13. D. Hensher, «Stated Preference Analysis Of Travel Choices: The State Of Practice,» Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 107-133, 1994.
  14. M. Anillo Galeano, Desarrollo de modelos para estimar la ponderación de los atributos del nivel de servicio en la toma de decisiones entre alternativas de transporte, Barranquilla: Universidad del Norte, 2006.
  15. J. Quintana Valido, «El tiempo de viaje como variable competitiva en el diseño de tarifas de transporte,» vector plus, Vols. %1 de %2Enero-Junio, pp. 83-88, 2010.
  16. O. A. Alfonso, Modelos de elección discreta en trasnportes con coeficientes aleatorios, coruña: universidad de la coruña, 2005.
  17. S. Montalva y H. Emilio, Análisis microeconómico de politicas para combatir la congestion vial, santiago de chile: universidad de chile, 2010.
  18. I. M. d. Transporte, V. Rivera, C. Rivera y G. Torres, «Estudio de la demanda de transporte,» Secretaria de Comunicaciones y Transportes, Querétaro, 2002.
  19. M. Bierlaire y M. Fetiarison, «Estimation Of Discrete Choice Models: Extending Biogeme,» S Transpor, p. 21, 2009.
  20. L. Montero Mercadé, Modelos de captación, análisis e interpretación de datos, Catalunya: Universidad Politecnica de Catalunya, 2012.
  21. Ministerio de Transporte de Colombia, «Manual de cálculo de los indicadores de monitoreo y evaluación de proyectos de transporte urbano en colombia,» Bogota, 2009.
  22. J. C. Mendieta, Apuntes de Clase – Introducción a la economía del transporte la teoría de la demanda de transporte urbano, Bogotá: Universidad de Los Andes, 2008.
  23. J. de Cea, E. Fernández, A. Salgado y M. Fernández, Calibracion de funciones flujo-costo para un modelo de asignacion de transporte publico con restriccion de capacidad, Santiago de Chile: Universidad Catolica de Chile, 2009.
  24. I. M. d. Transporte y E. Moreno Quintero, «Métodos de elección discreta en la estimación de la demanda de transporte,» Secretaria de Comunicaciones y Transporte, Querétaro, 2011.
  25. G. Kocur, Guide To Forecasting Travel Demand With Direct Utility, Washington, D.C: Urban Mass Transportation Administration-US Department of Transportation, 1982.
  26. J. E. C. Maquilon, C. A. Gonzalez y J. Posada, «Variables psicológicas en la eleccion de un modo de transporte urbano: integración de modelos de elección discreta,» de 10° congreso colombiano de ingeniería de tránsito y transporte, Medellín, 2010.
  27. A. Morales Fernandez, Modelación y simulación de una vía rápida con rampas usando autómatas celulares, México: Instituto Politecnico Nacional, 2010.
  28. F. Yu-qin, «Route Choice Model Considering Generalized Travel Cost Based on Game Theory,» Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 1, nº 464038, p. 5, 2013.
  29. B. Si, «Travel demand-based assignment model for multimodal and multiuser transportation system,» Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 1, nº 592104, p. 22, 2012.