Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Revista UIS Ingenierías
Articles

Development of a field metallographic replica procedure for CA6NM stainless steel hydraulic runners

John Edison Morales-Galeano
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Henry León-Henao
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Jorge Enrique Giraldo-Barrada
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Alejandro Toro-Betancur
Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Published 2025-03-05

Keywords

  • CA6NM,
  • Metallographic replica,
  • Microstructure,
  • Post-weld heat treatment (PWHT),
  • Hydraulic runners

How to Cite

Morales-Galeano, J. E., León-Henao, H., Giraldo-Barrada, J. E., & Toro-Betancur, A. (2025). Development of a field metallographic replica procedure for CA6NM stainless steel hydraulic runners. Revista UIS Ingenierías, 24(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18273/revuin.v24n1-2025001

Abstract

Pelton and Francis hydraulic runners, alongside other components of hydroelectric turbine generators, are typically made in soft martensitic stainless steels, especially grade CA6NM from ASTM A743 standard, also known as 13-4.  These hydromechanical components may experience deterioration during service due to the occurrence such as cracks or fractures, as well as wear associated with cavitation or erosion.  Commonly, defects are repaired using conventional

welding processes employing electrodes with chemical composition, microstructure, and mechanical properties like those of CA6NM.  However, these weld repairs not only lead to residual stresses but also to weld deposits and heat-affected zones (HAZ) with martensitic microstructures that make the components susceptible to hydrogen-induced cracking (HIC) or brittle fracture in service.  Therefore, it is necessary to carry out post-weld heat treatments (PWHT) to reduce the level of residual stresses and transform the fresh martensite in the HAZ into softer and tougher tempered martensite.  PWHT of Pelton or Francis hydraulic runners is costly due to the large dimensions and weights of these components, in addition to the logistical challenges associated with disassembly, transportation, and the consequence loss of revenue.  When weld repairs are minor, the costs of PWHT become economically unfeasible.  As an alternative, localized PWHTs (not global) can be performed on-site with appropriate equipment.  However, doubts persist regarding how to verify the effectiveness of such localized PWHT.  To ensure that these localized PWHTs achieve, at least, the improvement of the microstructure of the weld metal and the HAZ, hardness measurements can be carried out on-site and metallography can be performed in the field using the non-destructive technique of metallographic replicas.  This work describes the methodology used to validate a procedure for acquiring and evaluating metallographic replicas on CA6NM steels and surfacing welds applied with EC410NiMo electrode under the following conditions: as-welded, with quenching, and quenching and tempering. The microstructures obtained with conventional laboratory metallography methods for AISI 4140 steel and EC410NiMo welds were compared with the replicas to establish the effectiveness of the technique for applications in hydroelectric turbine generator components. The procedure proposed by the study allows obtaining replica micrographs on CA6NM steel or similar welds with EC410NiMo of sufficient quality to identify the main constituents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. CCH, Specification for Inspection of Steel Castings for Hydraulic Machines. Wien: Cahier des Charges, 2014.
  2. J. Crawford, CA6NM - An update. Connecticut: Climax Molybdenum Company, 1974.
  3. H.-J. Niederau, “State of Development of Soft Martensitic Stainless Chromiium-Nickel Steels”, 119th General Session of the Material Committee of VDEh, Düsseldorf, Germany, pp. 129-135, 1977.
  4. W. P. Casas, S. Henkeb y N. Novickic, “Fracture toughness of CA6NM alloy, quenched and tempered, and of its welded joint without PWHT,” Welding International, vol. 23, nº 3, p. 166–172, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09507110802543344
  5. E. Folkhard, Welding Metallurgy of Stainless Steels, New York: Springer-Verlag Wien New York, 1988, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-8965-8
  6. United States Department of the Interior - Bureau of Reclamation, Turbine Repair. Denver, 2000.
  7. American Welding Society, “Specification for Stainless Steel Electrodes for Shielded Metal Arc Welding”, AWS A5.4/A5.4M, 2012.
  8. American Welding Society, “Specification for stainless steel flux cored and metal cored welding electrodes and rods”, AWS A5.22/A5.22M, 2012.
  9. American Welding Society, “Specification for bare stainless steel welding electrodes and rods”, AWS A5.9/A5.9M, 2022.
  10. Lippold & Kotecki, Welding metallurgy and weldability of stainless Steel. New Jersey: John Willey & Sons, 2005.
  11. J. C. Lippold, Welding Metallurgy and Weldability. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
  12. S. Kou, Welding Metallurgy. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
  13. D. Ferreiro, J. Alvarez, E. Ruíz, D. Mendez y L. Rodríguez, “Failure analysis of a Pelton turbine manufactured in soft martensitic stainless steel casting,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 18, nº 1, pp. 256-270, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.09.005
  14. G. Nath y S. Kumar, “Slurry erosion behaviour of pack boronized 13-4 martensitic stainless steel for hydro turbine blades,” Materials Today Proceedings, vol. 5, nº 9, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.04.151
  15. E. Foronda, N. Ramírez, J. A. Arboleda, A. Toro y J. Giraldo-Barrada, “Finite element analysis of the localized post-weld heat treatment of a Pelton runner,” Materials Today Communications, vol. 36, pp. 1-9, 2023, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4440913
  16. ASTM, “Standard Test Method for Leeb Hardness Testing of Steel Products”, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2022.
  17. ASTM, “Standard Practice for Production and Evaluation of Field Metallographic Replicas”, ASTM E1351-01(Reapproved 2020), West Conshohocken, PA, 2020.
  18. ASTM, “Standard Terminology Relating to Metallography”, ASTM E7-22 West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2022.
  19. M. L. Jenssen, A. H. Aedo, “Replicas metalograficas como ensayo no destructivo usadas para la evaluacion metalurgica del material de tubos de caldera,” IV Conferencia Panamericana de END, Buenos Aires.
  20. D. Zuljan, J. Grum, “Non-destructive metallographic analysis of surfaces and microstructures by means of replicas,” The 8th International Conference of the Slovenian Society for Non-Destructive Testing - Application of Contemporary Non-Destructive Testing in Engineering, Portorož, Slovenia, 2005.
  21. E. Vedovatti, K. Pagola, “Réplica metalográfica como herramienta para la detección temprana e identificación de mecanismos de daños metalúrgicos,” 5th Pan American Conference for NDT, Cancún, Mexico, 2011.
  22. V. K. Bafna, P. U. Haribhakti, “In-situ metallography for the plant health assessment study and failure investigation,” 4th Middle East NDT Conference and Exhibition, Kingdom of Bahrain, Dec 2007.
  23. S. Lynch, “Metallographic and fractographic techniques for characterising and understanding hydrogen-assisted cracking of metals,” Gaseous Hydrogen Embrittlement of Materials in Energy Technologies, 2012.
  24. C. D. Vivero, H. A. Merchan, “Análisis de la microestructura en los rodetes Pelton de la Central Hidroeléctrica Paute-Molino mediante réplicas metalográficas In-Situ,” trabajo de grado, Universidad Salesiana, Ecuador, 2019.
  25. S. Jana, “Non-destructive in-situ replication metallography,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 49, pp. 85-114, 1995, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(94)01314-Q
  26. Microset Products Ltd, “MICROSET Grade 202,” Hinckley, 2019.
  27. ASTM, “Standard Guide for Preparation of Metallographic Specimens”, ASTM E3-11West, Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2011.
  28. ASTM, “Standard Practice for Microetching Metals and Alloys”, ASTM E407-07 (Reap. 2015) West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2015.
  29. Böhler Welding Voestalpine, “Böhler CN 13/4 MC” Technical Sheet, 2020.
  30. ASTM, “Standard Specification for Chromium and Chromium Nickel Stainless Steel Plate, Sheet, and Strip for Pressure Vessels and for General Applications”, ASTM A 240/A240M -19, West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2019.
  31. ASTM, “Standard Specification for Castings, Iron-Chromium, Iron-Chromium-Nickel, Corrosion Resistant, for General Application”, ASTM A743/A743M-21 West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2021.