Revista UIS Ingenierías

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2012): Revista UIS Ingenierías
Articles

Hierarchization of technologies to industrial use of byproduct from fque´s bagasse anaerobic digestion

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España))
  • Lorena Plata,
  • Dayana Rivera,
  • Liliana Castro,
  • Carolina Guzmán,
  • Humberto Escalante
Lorena Plata
Programa Jóvenes Investigadores Colciencias
Bio
Dayana Rivera
Empresa Salgado Meléndez y Asociados SA
Bio
Liliana Castro
Universidad Santo Tomas
Bio
Carolina Guzmán
Universidad Industrial de Santander
Bio
Humberto Escalante
Universidad Industrial de Santander
Bio

Published 2012-12-15

Keywords

  • Fique’s bagasse,
  • sludge effluent,
  • AHP,
  • expert choice

How to Cite

Plata, L., Rivera, D., Castro, L., Guzmán, C., & Escalante, H. (2012). Hierarchization of technologies to industrial use of byproduct from fque´s bagasse anaerobic digestion. Revista UIS Ingenierías, 11(2), 171–185. Retrieved from https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistauisingenierias/article/view/171-185
Copyright Notice

Abstract

In Colombia, there are 20000 hectares seeding with fque´s plants, giving an annual yield of 1,16 t/ha of fber, which generate approximately 108000 t of fque´s bagasse (FB). This biomass is a suitable carbon source for biogas production according to its physicochemical characterization and heating power. Currently, FB anaerobic fermentation, using as inoculums of rumen fuid and pig manure, generate methane yield of 0,45 m3CH4/Kg added VS and a sludge effuent (SE) as a by-product. The inadequate disposition of SE would cause environmental problems in underground waters and soils. The physico-chemical and microbiological characterization of SE classifed, according with content of fbers, minerals, micronutrients and relative feed value (156, 12), as prime forage and as class B biosolid owing to the content of pathogens. By means of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology and software expert choice v.11.5, the preparation of soil conditioner and the animal feed production was selected like the alternatives adapted for the industrial advantage of SE.

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España))

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. MINISTERIO DE AMBIENTE, VIVIENDA Y DESARROLLO TERRITORIAL. Ministerio nacional de planeación. Guía ambiental del subsector fiquero. 2006.
  2. MINISTERIO DE AGRICULTURA Y DESARROLLO RURAL. Anuario estadístico del sector agropecuario y pesquero 2009.
  3. CASTRO L., ESCALANTE H., QUINTERO M., ORTIZ C., GUZMÁN C. Producción de Biogás a partir del bagazo de fique generado durante el beneficio de fique. 2009. Cuarto Simposio de química aplicada. SIQUIA. [ISBN 978-958- 8593-12-8].
  4. ESCALANTE H., ORTIZ C., GUZMAN C. Biogás a partir de bagazo de fique. Ediciones UIS. 2012.
  5. FYTILI D., ZABANIOTOU A. Utilization of sewage sludge in EU application of old and new methods—A review. 2008. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Vol. 12, pp.116-140.
  6. NIHOUL C., Dumping at sea. 1991. Ocean and Shoreline Management. Vol. 16, (3-4), pp. 313- 326.
  7. MONTERO M., JORDÁN M., HERNÁNDEZCRESPO M., SANFELIU T. The use of sewage sludge and marble residues in the manufacture of ceramic tile bodies. 2009. Applied Clay Science. Vol. 46, pp. 404–408.
  8. ANGERBAUER C., SIEBENHOFER M., MITTELBACH M., GUEBITZ G. Conversion of sewage sludge into lipids by Lipomyces starkeyi for biodiesel production. 2008. Bioresource Technology. Vol. 99, pp. 3051–3056.
  9. SONG U., LEE E. Environmental and economic assessment of sewage sludge compost application on soil and plants in a landfill. 2010. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. Vol. 54, pp. 1109– 1116.
  10. HWANG J., ZHANG L., SEO S., LEE Y-W., JAHNG D. Protein recovery from excess sludge for its use as animal feed. 2008. Bioresource Technology. Vol. 99, pp. 8949–8954.
  11. Expert Choice, Expert Choice Inc. Available from <http://www.expertchoice.com>.
  12. ISHIZAKA A., LABIB A. Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 38, Issue 11, October 2011, Pages 14336-14345
  13. MARTÍNEZ E. Aplicación del proceso jerárquico de análisis en la selección de la localización de una PYME. 2007. Anuario jurídico y económico Escurialense. pp. 523-542.
  14. COLOMBO S., ANGUS A., MORRIS J., PARSONS D., BRAWN M., STACEY K., HANLEY N. A comparison of citizen and “expert” preferences using an attribute-based approach to choice. 2009. Ecological Economics Vol. 68, pp. 2834–2841.
  15. SAATY T., Practical Strategy. Open Access Material. AHP. 2004, Pearson Education Limited. pp. 2.
  16. WERTHERA J, OGADAB T. Sewage sludge combustion. 1999. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. Vol. 25, pp. 55–116.
  17. GIUSEPPE M., SBRILLI A., GUERRIERO E., ROTATORI M. Dioxins and furans formation in pilot incineration tests of sewage sludge spiked with organic chlorine. 2004. Chemosphere. Vol. 54, pp. 1337–1350.
  18. TORRES P., PÉREZ A., ESCOBAR J.C, URIBE I. Compostaje de biosólidos de plantas de tratamiento de águas residuales. 2007. Eng. Agríc., Jaboticabal, Vol. 27, pp. 267-275.
  19. TARRASÓN D., OJEDA G., ORTIZ O., ALCAÑIZ JM., Differences on nitrogen availability in a soil amended with fresh, composted and thermally-dried sewage sludge. 2008. Bioresource Technology. Vol. 99, pp. 252– 259.
  20. FERNÁNDEZ J, PLAZA C., GARCIA-GIL J, POLO A. Biochemical properties and barley yield in a semiarid Mediterranean soil amended with two kinds of sewage sludge. 2009. Applied Soil Ecology. Vol. 42, pp. 18–24.
  21. KIDD P., DOMÍNGUEZ-RODRÍGUEZ M., DÍEZ J., MONTERROSO C. Bioavailability and plant accumulation of heavy metals and phosphorus in agricultural soils amended by long-term application of sewage sludge. 2007. Chemosphere. Vol. 66, pp. 1458-1467.
  22. U.S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA). Land application .2000. under 832-F-00-064 Office of Water/ Office Science and Technology Sludge/ Risk Assessment Branch. Washington.
  23. INSTITUTO COLOMBIANO DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS Y CERTIFICACIÓN (ICONTEC). NTC5167. Productos para la industria agrícola. Productos organánicos usados como abonos o fertilizantes y enmiendas o acondicionadores de suelo. Segunda Actualización. 2011. Bogotá. Colombia.
  24. WENGA C-H., LIN D-F., CHIANGB P-C. Utilization of sludge as brick materials. 2003. Advances in Environmental Research. Vol. 7, pp. 679–685.
  25. BALASUBRAMANIAN J., SABUMON P., LAZAR J., ILANGOVAN R. Reuse of textile effluent treatment plant sludge in building materials. 2006. Waste Management .Vol. 26, pp. 22–28.
  26. CHIANGA K-J., CHOUA P-H., HUAA C-R., CHIENA K-L, CHEESEMANB C. Lightweight bricks manufactured from water treatment sludge and rice husks. 2009. Journal of Hazardous Materials. Vol. 171, pp. 76–82.
  27. CHOWDHURY S., Biodigester effluent as protein supplement for indigenous (Bos indicus) growing bulls. 1999. Animal Production, Research Division, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Dhaka 1341, Bangladesh.
  28. VILLAS-BOAS S., ESPOSITO E., MITCHELLC D., Microbial conversion of lignocellulosic residues for production of animal feeds Review. 2002. Animal Feed Science and Technology. Vol. 98. pp. 1–12.
  29. GARCÍA Y., GUADALUPE M., R. BOCOURT R., ALVELO N., NUÑEZ O., Agave Fourcroydes, Una planta con potencialidades para obtener prebióticos. Revista Computadorizada de Producción Porcina 2010 [online] [cited; Abril 2 2011]: http://www.iip.co.cu/rcpp/RCPP%20 17.1.pdf.
  30. U.S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA). Control of Pathogens and Vector Attraction in Sewage Sludge, in EPA/625/R-92/013. 2003.
  31. TARAS, MICHAEL J., Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater , American public health association: new york, n. y., 1971. 13th edition. pp.874.
  32. VAN SOEST P. J., ROBERTSON B., and LEWIS B. A. Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1991, J Dairy Sci 743583- 3597.
  33. TORRES P., MADERA C., SILVA J., Microbiological quality improvement of biosolids from domestic wastewater treatment plants. 2009. Revista EIA Print ISSN, pp.1794-1237.
  34. MARÍN A., AGUILAR H. Evaluación de la efectividad del sistema de tratamiento de lodos sépticos de la Earth. 2005. Universidad Earth. Costa Rica, pp. 25.
  35. ZANGENEH A., JADID S., RAHIMI-KIAN A. A hierarchical decision making model for the prioritization of distributed generation technologies: A case study for Iran. 2009. Energy Policy. Vol. 37, pp. 5752–5763.
  36. KAHRAMAN C., KAYA J., A fuzzy multicritieria methodology for selection among energy alternatives. 2010. Expert Systems with Applications. Vol. 37 (9), pp. 6270-6281.
  37. U.S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Sewage Sludge Incineration Units; Final Rule. 2011. Vol. 76. Part II. 40 CFR Part 60.
  38. U.S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. Fact sheet in-vessel composting of biosolids.2000. Biosolids technology.EPA 832-F- 00-061.
  39. HARA K., MINO T. Environmental assessment of sewage sludge recycling options and treatment processes in Tokyo. 2008. Waste Management. Vol. 28, pp. 2645–2652.
  40. U.S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. Compos-Free Bioreactor, treatment of acid rock drainage leviathan mine, California.2006. Innovative technology evaluation report. EPA/540/R-06/009.
  41. KAYA T., KAHRAMAN C. Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul. 2010. Energy Vol.35. pp. 2517-2527.
  42. ECKLER D.W., HARPER J. M. Process and apparatus for recovering feed products from animal manure.1975. Patente de Estados Unidos 3875319.
  43. WERLE S., WILKA R. review of methods for the thermal utilization of sewage sludge: The Polish perspective. 2010. Renewable Energy. Vol. 35, pp. 1914–1919.
  44. U.S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Biosolids .Generation, Use, and Disposal in The United States. 1999. EPA530-R-99-009.
  45. CHIANG K-Y., CHOU P-H., HUA C-R, CHIEN K-L., CHEESEMAN C .Lightweight bricks manufactured from water treatment sludge and rice husks .2009. Journal of Hazardous Materials. Vol. 171, pp. 76–82.
  46. SANCHEZ-MONEDEROA M.A., MONDINIB C., DE NOBILIC M., LEITAB .L, ROIG A. Land application of biosolids. Soil response to different stabilization degree of the treated organic matter. 2004. Waste Management. Vol. 24, pp. 325–332.