Vol. 12 No. 2 (2021): Cambios y Permanencias
Dossier Experiencias y prácticas de investigación

Training for research from the perspective of the subject. Community project of resistance to scholastic learning

Rafael Sandoval Álvarez
Universidad de Guadalajara
Bio

Published 2021-12-13

Keywords

  • Research from the perspective of the subject,
  • the learning community,
  • the Seminar way.

How to Cite

Sandoval Álvarez, R. . (2021). Training for research from the perspective of the subject. Community project of resistance to scholastic learning. Cambios Y Permanencias, 12(2), 279–298. Retrieved from https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistacyp/article/view/12837

Abstract

This article contains a problematization and critical reflection from the problematization with respect to an experience in which we rehearse the Seminar form with a view to the perspective of building a learning community, or rather, a community of resistance to scholastic learning. A, on the subject of an ongoing training experience for research that considers the possibility of trying to experiment with the ways of doing specific subjects who have a different trajectory, that we are trying that in these ways of doing research they consider the subject and the research problem as centrality, so that there is a relationship between subjects in the manner of a community of resistance to inherited ways of doing research that objectify subjects and do not recognize that intersubjectivity is from where knowledge emanates. Thus, this has to do with what we now intend to develop who make up a study group and research team, which transits in this perspective of learning by doing consciously what we have been doing unconsciously in previous research experiences, confronting previous experience with what that we have been able to configure in an incipient and embryonic collective research exercise.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Referencias Bibliográficas
  2. Freud, S. (1997). Análisis terminable e interminable. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Biblioteca Nueva / Editorial Losada.
  3. Guattari, F. (2013). Líneas de fuga: por otro mundo de posibles. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina: Cactus.
  4. Levin de Said, A. (2004). El sostén del ser. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidos.
  5. Rivera Cusicanqui, S. (2014). Hambre de Huelga. México: La Mirada Salvaje.
  6. Salcido, R., y Sandoval, R. (2016) El problema y el sujeto en la investigación. Guadalajara, México: Grietas Editores.
  7. Sandoval, R. (2016). Pensar como forma-método, problematizar como modo de caminar preguntando. Otra forma de de relación entre lo epistemológico y lo político. En R. Sandoval, Formas de hacer metodología en la investigación. Reflexividad crítica sobre la práctica. México: Grietas Editores.
  8. Sandoval, R. (2019). Pensar crítico y la forma seminario en la metodología de la investigación. México: Universidad de Guadalajara.
  9. Sitios Web
  10. Vera, R. (2021). Defendamos nuestra relación con la tierra. Ojarasca, suplemento de La Jornada 2021-09-11. Recuperado de https://www.jornada.com.mx/notas/2021/09/11/sociedad/defendamos-nuestra-relacion-con-la-tierra-ojarasca/