Revista Filosofía UIS

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2010): Revista Filosofía UIS
Research Article

Transforming of husserlian phenomenology

PDF (Español (España))
  • Manas Roy
Manas Roy
Evening College, India
Bio

Published 2010-07-27

Keywords

  • Photoconsciousness,
  • photosyntagm,
  • photosyntagmatics,
  • déconcert

How to Cite

Roy, M. (2010). Transforming of husserlian phenomenology. Revista Filosofía UIS, 9(1), 131–157. Retrieved from https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/1430

Copyright (c) 2010 Manas Roy

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

In this paper I have tried to examine Husserl’s attempt to establish a ground for science with the so called transcendental reduction towards a ‘photo’ reduction of ‘epoché’. This will entail both an identification of the problems that Husserl was attempting to solve as well as a careful analysis of linguistic account of his methodology.

PDF (Español (España))

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Translated by- Gibson, New York: MacMillan Co.
  2. Kolakowski, Leszek (1987). Husserl and the Search for Certitude, University of Chicago Press. For What Tomorrow. A Dialogue with Elisabeth Roudinesco. Stanford University Press 2004.
  3. Hubert L. Dreyfus & Paul Rabinow (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, The University of Chicago, USA: Press. Speech and Phenomena, and Other Essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs. (1973). Trans. by David B. Allison, Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Stiegler, Bernard. “Derrida and Technology: Fidelity at the Limits of Deconstruction and the Prosthesis of Faith,” Nacques Derrida and the Humanities, In: Tom Cohen (ed.), (ISBN 0-521-62565-3).
  4. Ströker, Elisabeth (1993) Husserl’s Transcendental Phenomenology, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  5. Dreyfus, Hubert (ed.) (1982). Husserl, Intentionality, and Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. “Noema and Meaning in Husserl,” Phenomenology and Philosophical Research, 50: 263-271. “Husserl’s Theory of the Intentionality of Consciousness”, in: Dreyfus (ed.) 1982.
  6. Schütz, Alfred (1966). “The Problem of Transcendental Intersubjectivity in Husserl,” In: Collected Papers III, The Hague: Nijhoff.
  7. Norris, Christopher (1982). Deconstruction: Theory and Practice.
  8. Thomas, Michael (2006). The Reception of Derrida: Translation and Transformation. Eyes of the University: Right to Philosophy 2, trans. Jan Plug (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004). Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak: Johns Hopkins University Press (1976) Lawlor, Leonard, Derrida and Husserl: The Basic Problem of Phenomenology (Indiana: Indiana University Press).
  9. Stephen W. Hawking (1992). A Brief History Of Time. Bantam Press, Transworld Publishers Ltd. Great Britain.
  10. Stephen W. Hawking (1992). The Theory Of Everything. Publisher: Phoenix Books.
  11. Roy, Manas (2008). “Derrida’s Philosophical Déconstruction”, Transcendent Philosophy Journal, Vol.9, Dec.2008 edition, pp.237-246.
  12. Roy, Manas (2010). "Phenomenological Existentialism", Think, Vol.9, Issue 24, pp 51-63, Published by: The Royal Institute of Philosophy; Cambridge University Press, U.K.