REVISTA FILOSOFIA UIS

v. 9 n. 1 (2010): Revista Filosofía UIS
Artigo de Pesquisa

Transformación de la metodología husserliana

PDF (Español (España))
  • Manas Roy
Manas Roy
Evening College
Biografia

Publicado 2010-07-27

Palavras-chave

  • fotociencia,
  • fotosintagma,
  • fotosintagmáticos,
  • déconcert

Como Citar

Roy, M. (2010). Transformación de la metodología husserliana. REVISTA FILOSOFIA UIS, 9(1), 131–157. Recuperado de https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistafilosofiauis/article/view/1430

Copyright (c) 2010 Manas Roy

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Resumo

En este artículo se examina el esfuerzo de Husserl por establecer un campo para la ciencia en aquello que se denomina, photo reducción de epoché. Esto implica tanto la identificación de los problemas que Husserl estuvo intentando resolver, como un análisis cuidadoso de la explicación lingüística de su metodología.

PDF (Español (España))

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

  1. Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Translated by- Gibson, New York: MacMillan Co.
  2. Kolakowski, Leszek (1987). Husserl and the Search for Certitude, University of Chicago Press. For What Tomorrow. A Dialogue with Elisabeth Roudinesco. Stanford University Press 2004.
  3. Hubert L. Dreyfus & Paul Rabinow (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, The University of Chicago, USA: Press. Speech and Phenomena, and Other Essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs. (1973). Trans. by David B. Allison, Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Stiegler, Bernard. “Derrida and Technology: Fidelity at the Limits of Deconstruction and the Prosthesis of Faith,” Nacques Derrida and the Humanities, In: Tom Cohen (ed.), (ISBN 0-521-62565-3).
  4. Ströker, Elisabeth (1993) Husserl’s Transcendental Phenomenology, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  5. Dreyfus, Hubert (ed.) (1982). Husserl, Intentionality, and Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. “Noema and Meaning in Husserl,” Phenomenology and Philosophical Research, 50: 263-271. “Husserl’s Theory of the Intentionality of Consciousness”, in: Dreyfus (ed.) 1982.
  6. Schütz, Alfred (1966). “The Problem of Transcendental Intersubjectivity in Husserl,” In: Collected Papers III, The Hague: Nijhoff.
  7. Norris, Christopher (1982). Deconstruction: Theory and Practice.
  8. Thomas, Michael (2006). The Reception of Derrida: Translation and Transformation. Eyes of the University: Right to Philosophy 2, trans. Jan Plug (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004). Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak: Johns Hopkins University Press (1976) Lawlor, Leonard, Derrida and Husserl: The Basic Problem of Phenomenology (Indiana: Indiana University Press).
  9. Stephen W. Hawking (1992). A Brief History Of Time. Bantam Press, Transworld Publishers Ltd. Great Britain.
  10. Stephen W. Hawking (1992). The Theory Of Everything. Publisher: Phoenix Books.
  11. Roy, Manas (2008). “Derrida’s Philosophical Déconstruction”, Transcendent Philosophy Journal, Vol.9, Dec.2008 edition, pp.237-246.
  12. Roy, Manas (2010). "Phenomenological Existentialism", Think, Vol.9, Issue 24, pp 51-63, Published by: The Royal Institute of Philosophy; Cambridge University Press, U.K.