Vol. 15 No. 1 (2016): Revista Filosofía UIS
Research Article

Friedrich Hayek: the theory of knowledge and the epistemic foundation for the criticism of planned economy

Leandro Gastón Indavera Stieben
Universidad Nacional de Chilecito
Bio

Published 2016-06-24

Keywords

  • Hayek,
  • knowledge,
  • criticism,
  • planned,
  • economy

How to Cite

Indavera Stieben, L. G. (2016). Friedrich Hayek: the theory of knowledge and the epistemic foundation for the criticism of planned economy. Revista Filosofía UIS, 15(1), 89–195. https://doi.org/10.18273/revfil.v15n1-2016004

Abstract

Firstly, the aim of this paper is to analyse several Hayek´s writings in order to understand his conception of knowledge and in order to show how these conceptions are useful as a tool to set, partially, the foundations of free market and the denial of any economic planning. Secondly, Hayek´s ideas will be analysed in order to show how it is possible to build a subjective theory of value based on Hayek´s theory of knowledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Caldwell, B. (2004). Hayek's Challenge: An Intelectual Biography of F.A Hayek.
  2. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
  3. Connin, L. (1990). “Hayek, Liberalism and Social Knowledge”. Canadian Journal
  4. of Political Science, 23 (2).
  5. Gómez, R. (2003). Neoliberalismo Globalizad: Refutación y debacle. Buenos Aires:
  6. Macchi.
  7. Hausman, D. (1992). The inexact and separate science of economics. New York:
  8. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Hayek, F. (1967). Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics. Chicago: University
  10. of Chicago Press.
  11. Hayek, F. (1979a). The Counter-Revolution of Science. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.
  12. Hayek, F. (1979b). The political Order of a Free People. Vol. 3 of Law, Legislation,
  13. and Liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  14. Hayek, F. (1980a). Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: The University of
  15. Chicago Press.
  16. Hayek, F. (1980b). Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: The University of
  17. Chicago Press.
  18. Hayek, F. (1981). Nuevos Estudios en Filosofía, Política, Economía e Historia de las
  19. ideas. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.
  20. Hayek, F. (1992). The Sensory Order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  21. Hayek, F. (1994). Hayek on Hayek: An Autobiographical Dialogue. Chicago: The
  22. University of Chicago Press
  23. Hayek, F. (2005). Camino de servidumbre. Barcelona: Alianza editorial.
  24. Horwitz, S. (2000). From The Sensory Order to the liberal order: Hayek's nonrationalist
  25. Liberalism. Review of Austrian Economics, 13 (1).
  26. Hutchison, T. (1981). The Politics and Philosophy of Economics: Marxians,
  27. Keynesians, and Austrians. Oxford: Blackwell.
  28. Duran, C. y Di Gregori, C. (2013). “La naturaleza de lo a priori y el elemento
  29. pragmático en el conocimiento” de Clarence Irving Lewis. Redes, 10 (20), 89-117.
  30. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=90702005
  31. Lawson, T. (2005). “The (confused) state of equilibrium analysis in modern
  32. economics: an explanation”. Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, 27 (3).
  33. Luján, C. (2003). “El apriorismo de Ludwig von Mises”. Laissez–Faire, (18-19),
  34. -56.
  35. Ortiz, D. (2009). “El orden sensorial, individualismo y conocimiento económico
  36. en la obra de F.A. Hayek”. Revista de economía institucional, 11 (20).
  37. Popper, K. (1967). El desarrollo del Conocimiento Científico: Conjeturas y
  38. Refutaciones. Buenos Aires: Paidós
  39. Popper, K. (1985). La Lógica de la Investigación Científica. Buenos Aires: REI.
  40. Pozo, J. (1992). Teorías Cognitivas del aprendizaje. Madrid: Morata.
  41. Rosicka, J. (2002). “Liebniz's Science on Economy. Economic Security versus
  42. Economic Scarcity”. En Actas del VII Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress. Nihil Sine
  43. Ratione, Hannover.
  44. Scarano, E. (2004). “El Apriorismo de Ludwig Von Mises”. Revista Libertas, (41).
  45. Yeager, L. (1994). Mises and Hayek on Calculation and Knowledge. The Review of
  46. Austrian Economics, 7 (2).