Published 2007-08-02
Keywords
- interpretation,
- psychoanalysis,
- language,
- answer,
- word
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2007 Revista Filosofía UIS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
On speaking of interpretation it is not a matter of noticing a plain lexical coincidence, in other words, designating with the same word "interpretation", acts that even though their differences, they don't have a common structure among themselves, but the interpretation essentially addresses to consider that character of being languages beings; the condition heretofore stated leads to think that we commonly move around facts and situations that make us to live in a constantly interpretation exercise. In that sense, the current text attends, from the psychoanalytic theory, some questions from which it can be possible to make an approximation to what indicates and implies the meaning of interpretation. One of them, perhaps the core of all, might be stated as follows: Is it permissible, as suppose by some, to restring the concept of interpretation to an special act, even specialized, own of some learning and disciplines, specific of certain pathologies, or certain situations and that must take place only for particular facts, but not for all?