REVISTA FILOSOFIA UIS

v. 24 n. 1 (2025): Janeiro - junho
Artigos

Argumentos comparativos e análise ética: aborto seletivo e eugenia

PDF (English)
  • Tomás Hernández Mora
Tomás Hernández Mora
Universidad de La Laguna, España
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18273/revfil.v24n1-2025009

Publicado 2025-01-20

Palavras-chave

  • aborto seletivo,
  • eugenia,
  • liberdades reprodutivas,
  • vida humana

Como Citar

Hernández Mora, T. (2025). Argumentos comparativos e análise ética: aborto seletivo e eugenia. REVISTA FILOSOFIA UIS, 24(1), 187–215. https://doi.org/10.18273/revfil.v24n1-2025009

Copyright (c) 2025 REVISTA FILOSOFIA UIS

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Resumo

O objetivo deste artigo é avaliar eticamente o aborto seletivo e a eugenia, assim como analisar a viabilidade prática de comparar ambos os termos com o fim de legitimar, ou não, a proibição dessa forma de interrupção de gravidez. Para esse fim, será estudado o conceito de “aborto”, com ênfase na noção de “aborto seletivo”. Da mesma forma, será explicado o conceito de “eugenia”, suas origens, objetivos e consequências. Em seguida, serão apresentados vários argumentos que comparam o aborto seletivo com a eugenia, assim como possíveis contra-argumentos. Por fim, será exposta a inviolabilidade da vida humana, a humanidade do feto, a viabilidade ética da chamada “eugenia liberal” e concluir-se-á que, devido ao fato de a eugenia não ser um conceito homogêneo, compará-la com o aborto seletivo para deslegitimar sua legalidade ou viabilidade ética é inviável.

PDF (English)

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

  1. Agar, N. (2004). Liberal Eugenics. In defense of Human enhancement. Blackwell.
  2. Agar, N. (April 4, 2021). Confessions of a philosophical shit-stirrer. ABC. https://www.abc.net.au/religion/confessions-of-a-philosophical-shit-stirrer/13611942. [Accessed April 4, 2024].
  3. Anzilotty, A. (2020). Tay-Sachs disease, KidsHealth. https://kidshealth.org/es/parents/tay-sachs.html.[Accessed February 21, 2024].
  4. Belli, L., & Suárez, D. (2021). La autonomía revisitada desde la perspectiva de una bioética feminista. En Herrera, M., Fernández, S., De la Torre, C., y Videtta, C. (eds.). Tratado de Géneros, Derecho y Justicia (pp. 437-461) Rubinzal Curloni.
  5. Bentham, J. (1780). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Batoche Books.
  6. Buchanan, A., Brock, D., Daniels, N., and Wikler, D. (2000). From Chance to Choice. Genetics and Justice. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Carti, G. D., Azaña, S., y Salvador, Z. (october 20, 2022). ¿Cuántos tipos de aborto hay y cómo se diferencian? Reproducción Asistida ORG https://www.reproduccionasistida.org/tipos-aborto-espontaneo/ [accessed March 3, 2024].
  8. Casas, X. (february 24, 2022). Decisión histórica sobre derechos de aborto en Colombia. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/es/news/2022/02/24/decision-historica-sobre-derechos-de-aborto-en-colombia [Accessed March 3, 2024].
  9. Conversesacatalunya (june 15, 2020). ¿Cuándo empieza la vida humana? Un polémico experimento lo sitúa en primer plano. Converses a Catalunya. https://conversesacatalunya.cat/es/cuando-empieza-la-vida-humana-un-polemico-experimento-lo-situa-en-primer-plano/ [accessed March 3, 2024]
  10. Crew, F. A. E., Darlington, C. D., Haldane, J. B. S., Harland, C., Hogben, L. T., Huxley, J. S., Muller, H. J., Needham., J., Child, G. P., Koller, P. C., David, P. R., Landauer, W., Dahlberg, G., Plough, H. H., Dobzhansky, T. H., Price, B., Emerson, R. A., Schultz, J., Gordon, C.,… Huskins, C. L. (1939). Social Biology and Population Improvement. Nature, 144, 521-522.
  11. David, H.P., Fleishhacker, J., & Höhn, C. (1988). Abortion and Eugenics in Nazi Germany. Population and Development Review, 14, 81-112.
  12. Derbyshire, S. W. G, & Bockmann, J. C. (2020). Reconsidering Fetal Pain, Journal of Medical Ethics, 46, 3-6.
  13. Devandas, C. (december 19, 2019). Rights of persons with disabilities: Report of the Special Rapporteur on the rights of persons with disabilities. General Assembly. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3872393?ln=en [Accessed February 14, 2024].
  14. Feilberg, J. (1994). Wrongful Life and the Counterfactual Element in Harming. Freedom and Fulfillment, 4(1), 3-37.
  15. Fiallo, M. (october 3, 2023). Agrupaciones feministas ecuatorianas pretenden imponer la eugenesia. La Gaceta. https://gaceta.es/iberosfera/un-grupo-de-feministas-ecuatorianas-pretende-imponer-la-eugenesia-20231003-0145/ [Accessed March 29, 2024].
  16. Fletcher, J. (1974). The Ethics of Genetic Control. Ending Reproductive Roulette. Prometheus Books.
  17. Fox, D. (2007). The illiberality of Liberal Eugenics (vol. XX). Blackwell Publishing.
  18. Friedlander, H. (1995). The Origins of Nazi Genocide: From Euthanasia to the Final Solution. University of North Carolina Press.
  19. Friedman, L. (February 2, 2014). The Stranger-Than-Fiction Story Of A Woman Who Was Her Own Twin. Business Insider https://www.businessinsider.com/lydia-fairchild-is-her-own-twin-2014-2 [accessed April 18, 2024].
  20. Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. Straus and Giroux.
  21. Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development. Macmillan Publishers.
  22. Galton, F. (1910). The Eugenic College of Kantsaywhere. Wellcome Library. https://wellcomelibrary.org/item/b20613179#?cv=4&z=0.4749%2C0%2C1.9498%2C1.2248 [Accessed April 18, 2021].
  23. Gershon, L. (february 25, 2019). Judging Families at the State Fair. Jstor Daily https://daily.jstor.org/judging-families-at-the-state-fair/ [Accessed January 31, 2024].
  24. Gould, J. (2020). Culpable Ignorance, Professional Counselling, and Selective Abortion of Intellectual Disability. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 17, 369-381.
  25. Habermas, J. (2001). El futuro de la naturaleza humana: ¿Hacia una eugenesia liberal? (R, Carbó, trad.). Ediciones Paidós.
  26. Hernández, T. (2023). Análisis filosófico de la eugenesia liberal [Tesis doctoral, Universidad de La Laguna]. https://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/34612.2 [Accessed February 16, 2024].
  27. Hill, M., Barrett, A., Choolani, M., Lewis, C., Fisher, J., & Chitty, L. S. (2017). Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome? Prenatal Diagnosis, 37(13), 1281-1290.
  28. Hoffman, B. L., Schorge, J. O., Bradshaw, K. D., Halvorson, L. M., Schaffer, J. I., & Corton, M. M., (2008). Williams Gynecology (3. Ed). McGraw Hill Education.
  29. Ingram, A. (Spring 2021). McFall v. Shimp and the case of Bodily Autonomy. Harvard Undergraduate Law Review https://hulr.org/spring-2021/mcfall-v-shimp-and-the-case-for-bodily-autonomy [Accessed March 18, 2024].
  30. Kornblihtt, A. (july 17, 2018). Why I testified in the Argentina abortion debate. Nature https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05746-1 [Accessed 28 March 2024].
  31. Lafferriére, J. N. (2021). Transhumanismo, regulación de las tecnologías reproductivas y dignidad humana. Persona y Derecho, (84), 329-346.
  32. Lafferriére, J. N. (2022). El derecho, la nueva eugenesia, y las exigencias de la dignidad humana. In A. A. Herrera (ed.), Derechos humanos: perspectivas de juristas iusnaturalistas (pp. 769-791). Tirant lo Blanch.
  33. Martín, C. (march 22, 2023). España no defiende el derecho a la vida: entre los 100.000 niños que permite asesinar cada año en el vientre materno, muchos tienen Síndrome de Down. Hispanidad. https://www.hispanidad.com/sociedad/espana-no-defiende-derecho-vida-entre-100000-ninos-permite-asesinar-cada-ano-en-vientre-materno-muchos-tienen-sindrome-down_12041393_102.html [Accessed March 3, 2024].
  34. Martínez, G. (2023). Injusticia epistémica, aceleración, alienación y resonancia: aportes para la bioética desde el aborto. Co-Herencia, 21(40), 294-323.
  35. Martínez-Bordiú, A. (april 11, 2024). El Papa Francisco denuncia que los bebés con discapacidad son abortados por la ‘cultura de la muerte’., Aciprensa https://www.aciprensa.com/noticias/103929/papa-francisco-denuncia-la-cultura-de-la-muerte-y-lamenta-aborto-y-eutanasia [Accessed April 15, 2024].
  36. Menéndez, C. (december 30, 2020). Argentina legaliza el aborto. Así fue el triunfo de la marea verde. Euronews. https://es.euronews.com/2020/12/30/argentina-legaliza-el-aborto-asi-fue-el-triunfo-de-la-marea-verde [Accessed March 3, 2024].
  37. Mertes, H., & Segers, S. (2019). Does human genome editing reinforce or violate human dignity? Bioethics, 34(1), 33-40.
  38. Mill, J. S. (1861). Utilitarianism. Floating Press.
  39. Navas, P. (october 29, 2020). ¿Cuándo empieza la vida humana según la ciencia? Aleteia. https://es.aleteia.org/2020/10/29/cuando-empieza-una-vida-humana-segun-la-ciencia/ [Accessed April 18, 2024].
  40. Parfit, D. (1984). The non-identity problem. In Reasons and Persons (pp. 351-381). Oxford University Press.
  41. Paul, D. B. (1994). Is human genetics disguised eugenics? In R. F. Weir., S. C. Lawrence., & E Fales. (Eds.), Genes and human self-knowledge (pp. 67-83). University of Iowa Press.
  42. Ramírez de Castro, N. (september 18, 2013). Cuándo empieza a sentir dolor el feto? ABC. https://www.abc.es/sociedad/20130918/abci-cuando-siente-dolorfeto%20201309172222.html#:~:text=The%20University%20of%20London%20demonstrates,a%20distinct%20sensation%C3%B3n%20at%20contact. [Accessed April 18, 2024].
  43. Ranisch, R. (2019). Eugenics is Back? Historic References in Current Discussions of Germline Gene Editing. Nanoethics, 13, 209-222.
  44. Redacción Querétaro (2019) ¿Por qué la bioética permite el aborto hasta las 12 semanas? El Universal Querétaro. https://www.eluniversalqueretaro.mx/tendencias/por-que-la-bioetica-permite-el-aborto-hasta-las-12-semanas/ [Accessed April 18, 2024]
  45. Risøy, S., & Sirnes, T. (2015). The decision: Relations to self, authority and vulnerability in the field of selective abortion. Macmillan Publishers, 10(3), 317-340.
  46. Robertson, J. (1986). Embryos, Families, and Procreative Liberty: The Legal Structure of the New Reproduction. Southern California Law Review, 59(5), 939-945.
  47. Romanis, E. C. (2018). Artificial womb technology and the frontiers of human reproduction: conceptual differences and potential implications. Journal of Medical Ethics, 44(11), 751-755.
  48. Rosenau, H. (2018). Reproductive and Therapeutic Cloning. In M. Soniewicka, (Ed.), The Ethics of Reproductive Genetics (pp. 131-155). Springer.
  49. Saleeby, C. (1909). Parenthood and Race Culture. Cassel and Company LTD.
  50. Sandel, M. (2007). The Case Against Perfection. Harvard University Press.
  51. Sandel, M. (April, 2004). The Case Against Perfection. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2004/04/the-case-againstperfection/302927/ [Accessed February 12, 2024].
  52. Savulescu, J. (2001). Procreative Beneficence: Why we should Select the Best Children. Bioethics, 15(5-6), 414-426.
  53. Savulescu, J., & Kahane, G. (2009). The Moral Obligation to Create Children with the Best Chance of the Best Life. Bioethics, 23(5), 274-290.
  54. Soto, R. (march 5, 2024). Francia, primer país del mundo en incluir el derecho al aborto en la Constitución: qué implica este reconocimiento. Newtral. https://www.newtral.es/francia-reconoce-derecho-aborto-constitucion/20240305/
  55. Sparrow, R. (2015). Imposing Genetic Diversity. American Journal of Bioethics, 15(6), 2-10.
  56. Thompson, J. J. (1971). A Defense of Abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1(1), 47-66.
  57. Wikler, D. (1999). Can We learn from Eugenics? Journal of Medical Ethics, 25(2), 183-194.
  58. World Health Organization (november 25, 2021). Abortion. World Health Organization Website. https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion
  59. World Health Organization (march 9, 2022). WHO issues new guidelines on abortion to help countries deliver lifesaving care. World Health Organization Website. https://www.who.int/es/news/item/09-03-2022-access-to-safe-abortion-critical-for-health-of-women-and-girls
  60. Zuccarello, D., Sorrentino, U., Brasson, V., Marin, L., Piccolo, C., Capalbo, A., Andrisani, A., & Cassina, M. (2022). Epigenetics of pregnancy: looking beyond the DNA code. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 39(4), 801-816.