Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023): Revista UIS Ingenierías
Articles

Methodology for the structural analysis of a main deck of FPSO vessel supporting an offshore crane

Diego Fabián Hernández-Ménez
Universidad Veracruzana
Iván Félix-González
Mexican Petroleum Institute
José Hernández Hernández
Universidad Veracruzana
Agustin Leobardo Herrera-May
Universidad Veracruzana

Published 2022-12-27

Keywords

  • Main deck,
  • FEM,
  • FPSO,
  • Structural analysis,
  • Offshore crane,
  • Vessels
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Hernández-Ménez, D. F., Félix-González, I., Hernández Hernández, J., & Herrera-May, A. L. (2022). Methodology for the structural analysis of a main deck of FPSO vessel supporting an offshore crane. Revista UIS Ingenierías, 22(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.18273/revuin.v22n1-2023001

Abstract

Offshore cranes placed on the surface of Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) vessels affect the structural response of their main decks, which can alter the safe operation of the FPSO vessels. Generally, classification societies rules are used to predict the structural strength of the main deck of FPSO vessels. However, these classification societies rules are limited to estimate the variation of the structural performance of the main deck caused by the operation of offshore cranes under different hydrodynamic conditions. Here, we present a methodology to determine the alteration of the structural behavior of a main deck of FPSO vessel due to different operation conditions of a board offshore crane. This methodology considers the hydrodynamic response for two ultimate limit states: operating and storm conditions from 1000 m water depth in Gulf of Mexico with a return period of 10 and 100 years, respectively. The methodology includes finite element method (FEM) models of the main deck supporting an offshore crane to predict its structural response. The maximum von Mises stress of the main deck does not overcome its maximum permissible stress, which allows a safe operation of the FPSO crane. The proposed methodology can be used to estimate the structural behavior of main decks of FPSO vessels that are modified for supporting offshore cranes, regarding the hydrodynamic response for each FPSO under the operation and extreme conditions in its location. Thus, naval designers could select the better structural modifications of the main decks that decrease their costs of construction and maintenance.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. J. S. Templeton, “Jack-up Spud Can Foundation Fixity for Various Clay Strength Profiles,” in SNAME 24th Offshore Symposium, 2019.
  2. P. A. Gale, Design, The Ship Design Process. In Ship Design and Construction, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers: Jersey City, USA, 2003.
  3. U. Sood, “Assessment of Lifting Criteria for Crane on a Heavy Lift Ship 'Load Check and Fatigue Life Calculation”, Master Thesis, University of Rostock, 2017.
  4. American Petroleum Institute, Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms — Working Stress Design, 21th ed. API: Australia, 2000.
  5. O. Ozguc, “The assessment of impact damage caused by dropped objects on floating offshore structures,” Proc. IMechE Part M: J. Engineering for the Maritime Environment , vol. 235, no. 2, pp. 491-510, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090220972586
  6. S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Kwon, “Effects of Topside Structures and Wind Profile on Wind Tunnel Testing of FPSO Vessel Models,” J. Mar. Sci. Eng., vol. 8, no. 6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8060422
  7. J. Shin, “Load-spectrum models for offshore crane fatigue analysis,” International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering,” vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 480-486, https://doi.org/10.17736/ijope.2021.hc22
  8. B. N. Khudhur, “Finite element analysis of the boom of crane loaded statically,” Eng. Technol. J., vol. 31, pp. 1626–1639, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.2013.82179
  9. J. Krukowski, A. Maczyński, “Application of the rigid finite element method for modelling an offshore pedestal crane,” Arch. Mech. Eng., vol. 60, pp. 451-471, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/meceng-2013-0028
  10. T. Tuswan, K. Abdullah, A. Zubaydi, “Budipriyanto, A., Finite-element analysis for structural strength assessment of marine sandwich material on ship side-shell structure,” Mater. Today: Proc., vol. 13, pp. 109– 114, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.03.197
  11. C.M. Salazar-Domínguez, J. Hernández-Hernández, E. D. Rosas-Huerta, G. E. Iturbe-Rosas, A.L. Herrera-May, “Structural Analysis of a Barge Midship Section Considering the Still Water and Wave Load Effects,” J. Mar. Sci. Eng., vol. 9, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9010099
  12. DNV-GL, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://rules.dnv.com/docs/pdf/DNV/ST/201909/DNVGL-ST-0378.pdf
  13. DNV-GL, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.dnv.com/rules-standards
  14. LIEBHERR, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.liebherr.com/es/col/productos/gruas-maritimas/gruas-maritimas.html
  15. D.F. Hernández-Ménez, “Structural Analysis of Main Deck of a FPSO Vessel Supporting an Offshore Crane (Translation of Spanish),” Master Thesis, Universidad Veracruzana, Mexico, 2020.
  16. DNV-GL, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://rules.dnv.com/docs/pdf/DNV/RU-SHIP/2018-07/DNVGL-RU-SHIP-Pt3Ch7.pdf