Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Revista UIS Ingenierías
Articles

Methodology for Generating Solid Three-Dimensional Models from Computed Tomography Using Academic and Open-Source Software

Camila Carrasco-Lara
Universidad Austral de Chile
Belkys Amador-Cáceres
Universidad Austral de Chile
Guillaume Serandour-Boniot
Universidad Austral de Chile
Gabriela Martinez-Bordes
Universidad Austral de Chile

Published 2025-03-17

Keywords

  • Computed tomography,
  • Three-dimensional imaging,
  • 3D modeling,
  • Numerical analysis,
  • DICOM files

How to Cite

Carrasco-Lara, C., Amador-Cáceres , B. ., Serandour-Boniot, G., & Martinez-Bordes, G. (2025). Methodology for Generating Solid Three-Dimensional Models from Computed Tomography Using Academic and Open-Source Software. Revista UIS Ingenierías, 24(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.18273/revuin.v24n1-2025007

Abstract

The integration of image processing techniques for the generation of three-dimensional biomodels has driven significant advancements in biomedical engineering. These models have key applications in numerical simulations, such as those based on the finite element method allowing detailed evaluation of mechanical and biological environments, as well as the prediction of tissue structural behavior. This article presents a methodological approach to transform medical images into three-dimensional solid models using open-access or academic software, enhancing their applicability in educational and research contexts. The procedure is structured into three main stages: volumetric model generation from DICOM files, model editing and conversion into a solid and basic numerical analysis. Five different approaches were evaluated based on criteria such as number of required steps, process complexity, processing time, computational resource demands, reliance on additional tools, program limitations, and ease of preprocessing for subsequent simulations. From the comparison, it was identified that the combination of 3D Slicer for biomodel generation and Fusion 360 for editing, solid conversion, and numerical preprocessing is the most efficient and accessible alternative. The relevance of this methodology lies in its ability to serve as an essential preliminary step for computational numerical studies focused on areas such as tissue mechanics, biomechanics, and orthopedics. By enabling the generation of precise and adaptable models, this tool facilitates the evaluation of the structural and mechanical behavior of tissues based on the FEM. Consequently, the proposed enhances research and the development of personalized solutions in clinical and academic applications. This approach minimizes reliance on complementary tools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. M. Larobina, “Thirty Years of the DICOM Standard,” Tomography, 9, no. 5, pp. 1829–1838, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography9050145
  2. L. Zhou, M. Fan, C. Hansen, C. R. Johnson, D. Weiskopf, “A Review of Three-Dimensional Medical Image Visualization,” Health Data Science, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.34133/2022/9840519
  3. A. Calzado, J. Geleijns, “Tomografía Computarizada. Evolución, Principios Técnicos Aplicaciones,” Revista Física Médica, no. 11, vol. 3, 2010.
  4. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering. “Tomografía Computarizada (TC),” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.nibib.nih.gov
  5. B. Helgason, et al. “Mathematical Relationships Between Bone Density and Mechanical Properties: A Literature Review,” Clinical Biomechanics 23, no. 2, pp. 135–146 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.08.024
  6. D. Wagner, P. Lindsey, G. S. Beaupre, “Deriving Tissue Density and Elastic Modulus from MicroCT Bone Scans,” Bone 49, no. 5, pp. 931–938, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2011.07.021
  7. M. Hofer, Manual Práctico. Ed. Médica Panamericana, 2005.
  8. S. Patrick, N. P. Birur, K. Gurushanth, A. S. Raghavan, S. Gurudath, “Comparison of Gray Values of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography with Hounsfield Units of Multislice Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study,” Indian Journal of Dental Research, 28, no. 1, pp. 66–70 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_415_16
  9. F. Villena, A. Sánchez, “Fabricación de Biomodelos Tridimensionales Odontológicos a Partir de Tomografías Computarizadas,” Mouth, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1004602
  10. RadiAnt DICOM Viewer, RadiAnt Medical. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.radiantviewer.com
  11. InVesalius, Centro de Tecnologia da Informação Renato Archer, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.cti.gov.br/invesalius
  12. 3D Slicer, The Slicer Community. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.slicer.org
  13. ITK-SNAP, P. A. Yushkevich, G. Gerig, Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory & University of Utah. 2023. [Online]. Available: http://www.itksnap.org
  14. Mimics Medical, Materialise. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.materialise.com/en/medical/mimics-innovation-suite/mimics
  15. Meshmixer, Autodesk Inc. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.meshmixer.com
  16. MeshLab, CNR-ISTI. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.meshlab.net
  17. Fusion 360, Autodesk Inc. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.autodesk.com/products/fusion-360
  18. SpaceClaim, ANSYS Inc. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.ansys.com/products/3d-design/ansys-spaceclaim
  19. Blender, Blender Foundation. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.blender.org
  20. Ansys, ANSYS Inc. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.ansys.com
  21. Solidworks, Dassault Systèmes. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.solidworks.com
  22. Abaqus, Dassault Systèmes. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.3ds.com/products-services/simulia/products/abaqus
  23. Inventor Professional, Autodesk Inc. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.autodesk.com/products/inventor
  24. PTC Creo, PTC Inc. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.ptc.com/es/products/creo
  25. W. Bidgood, S. C. Horii, F. W. Prior, D. Van Syckle, “Understanding and Using DICOM, the Data Interchange Standard for Biomedical Imaging,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 199–212, 1997, doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.1997.0040199
  26. D. G. Ullman, The Mechanical Design Process. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2017.