Modelos neuroeconómicos explicativos de la relación entre aversión al riesgo, impulsividad y cardiocepción en estudiantes universitarios: revisión de alcance
PDF

Palabras clave

Neurociencias
Economía
Conducta impulsiva
Interocepción
Toma de decisiones
Estudiantes

Cómo citar

Pérez Rivero, P. F., & Mieles Toloza, I. L. (2023). Modelos neuroeconómicos explicativos de la relación entre aversión al riesgo, impulsividad y cardiocepción en estudiantes universitarios: revisión de alcance. Médicas UIS, 36(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.18273/revmed.v36n1-2023006

Resumen

Introducción: los modelos neuroeconómicos explican la toma de decisiones a partir de procesos neurofisiológicos, cognitivos y emocionales. La toma de decisiones se estudia a partir de otros subprocesos como la aversión al riesgo. La relación entre aversión al riesgo, impulsividad y/o interocepción es importante para determinar el rol de la conducta y cognición humanas en el mantenimiento de problemas de salud. Esto se ha estudiado en población universitaria, en la que se presentan factores de riesgo para la salud. Objetivo: sintetizar los modelos neuroeconómicos descritos en la literatura para establecer la relación entre la aversión al riesgo, impulsividad y/o la cardiocepción en estudiantes universitarios. Metodología: revisión tipo alcance realizada del 01 de junio al 30 de septiembre de 2021 en los recursos; PubMed, PsyInfo, Google Scholar, Sciencedirect, Scopus, Open dissertations y OpenGrey. Como criterio de inclusión se estableció que se tratara de investigaciones experimentales y observacionales en inglés o español en estudiantes universitarios que evaluaran la relación entre toma de decisiones, impulsividad y/o interocepción. No se filtró por fecha ni por tipo de acceso. Resultados: se rastrearon 1035 documentos, 14 cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. Se identificaron cuatro modelos: neuroeconómico conductual, paradigma de descuento temporal, teoría biopsicológica de Gray y diferencias individuales. Se hallaron correlaciones positivas y negativas entre impulsividad, aversión al riesgo e interocepción. Conclusiones: según los estudios existe una relación entre impulsividad y aversión al riesgo, que dependiendo del modelo implementado será positiva o negativa. Las asociaciones con interocepción son poco concluyentes y requieren mayor investigación.

 

 

https://doi.org/10.18273/revmed.v36n1-2023006
PDF

Referencias

Glimcher PW, Camerer CF, Fehr E, Poldrack RA. Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2009.

Kaklauskas A, Abraham A, Ubarte I, Kliukas R, Luksaite V, Binkyte-Veliene A, et al. A Review of AI Cloud and Edge Sensors, Methods, and Applications for the Recognition of Emotional, Affective and Physiological States. Sensors. 2022;22(20):7824.

Konovalov A, Krajbich I. Over a Decade of Neuroeconomics: What Have We Learned?. Organizational Research Methods. 2019;22(1):148-173.

Glimcher PW, Rustichini A. Neuroeconomics: The Consilience of Brain and Decision. Science. 2004;306(5695):447-452.

Dhami S, Al-Nowaihi A. Behavioral economics. En: Ramachandran VS, editor. Encyclopedia of human behavior. 2da ed. Elsevier Academic Press; 2012. p. 288–300.

Truc A. Neuroeconomics Hype or Hope? An Answer. Soc Sci Res Netw. 2023.

Glimcher PW. Foundations of Neuroeconomic Analysis. USA: Oxford University Press; 2011.

Gutnik LA, Hakimzada AF, Yoskowitz NA, Patel VL. The role of emotion in decision-making: a cognitive neuroeconomic approach towards understanding sexual risk behavior. J Biomed Inform. 2006;39(6):720-736.

Fehr E, Camerer CF. Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007;11(10):419-427.

Petracca E. Two Styles of Social Neuroeconomics. OEconomia. 2022;12(1):95-113.

Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica. 1979;47(2):263-291.

Cokely ET, Galesic M, Schulz E, Ghazal S, GarciaRetamero R. Measuring risk literacy: The berlin numeracy test. Judgm Decis Mak. 2012;7(1):25-47.

Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U. Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability?. Am Econ Rev. 2010;100(3):1238–1260.

Rodosthenous N, Zhang H. When to sell an asset amid anxiety about drawdowns. Math Financ. 2020;30(4):1422-1460.

Seth AK. Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013;17(11):565–573.

Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211(4481):453–458.

Perri RL, Berchicci M, Lucci G, Spinelli D, Di Russo F. How the brain prevents a second error in a perceptual decision-making task. Sci Rep. 2016; 6.

Bakhshani NM. Impulsivity: a predisposition toward risky behaviors. Int J high Risk Behav Addict. 2014;3(2).

Griffin SA, Lynam DR, Samuel DB. Dimensional conceptualizations of impulsivity. Personal Disord. 2018;9(4):333–345. 20.

Bari A, Robbins TW. Inhibition and impulsivity: Behavioral and neural basis of response control. Prog Neurobiol. 2013;108:44– 79.

Li X, Hu P, Liu J. The neuroanatomical correlates of individual differences in delay discounting: A voxel-based morphometry study. J Pac Rim Psychol. 2019;13.

Khadka S, Stevens MC, Aslanzadeh F, Narayanan B, Hawkins KA, Austad CS, et al. Composite impulsivity-related domains in college students. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;90:118–125.

Lopez-Guzman S, Konova AB, Glimcher PW. Computational psychiatry of impulsivity and risk: how risk and time preferences interact in health and disease. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019;374(1766).

Brown RA, Reed KMP, Bloom EL, Minami H, Strong DR, Lejuez CW, et al. Development and preliminary randomized controlled trial of a distress tolerance treatment for smokers with a history of early lapse. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(12):2005–2015.

Stautz K, Cooper A. Impulsivity-related personality traits and adolescent alcohol use: a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33(4):574–592.

Mosquera-Dussán O, Guzmán-Pérez D, TeránOrtega P, García J, Trujillo-Rojas C, ZamudioPalacio J, et al. Decision making, stress assessed by physiological response and virtual reality stimuli. Rev Colomb Psicol. 2020;29(2):89–103.

Grant JE, Lust K, Christenson GA, Redden SA, Chamberlain SR. Gambling and its clinical correlates in university students. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2019;23(1):33–39.

Amlung M, Marsden E, Holshausen K, Morris V, Patel H, Vedelago L, et al. Delay Discounting as a Transdiagnostic Process in Psychiatric Disorders: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(11):1176-1186.

Ng TH, Stange JP, Black CL, Titone MK, Weiss RB, Abramson LY, et al. Impulsivity predicts the onset of DSM-IV-TR or RDC hypomanic and manic episodes in adolescents and young adults with high or moderate reward sensitivity. J Affect Disord. 2016;198:88–95.

Villalba-Ruiz E, Verdejo-García A. Procesamiento emocional, interocepción y funciones ejecutivas en policonsumidores de drogas en tratamiento. Trastor Adict. 2012;14(1):10–20.

Dalley JW, Robbins TW. Fractionating impulsivity: neuropsychiatric implications. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18(3):158–171.

Turel O, Bechara A. A Triadic Reflective-ImpulsiveInteroceptive Awareness Model of General and Impulsive Information System Use: Behavioral Tests of Neuro-Cognitive Theory. Front Psychol. 2016;7:601.

Lopez-Guzman S, Konova AB, Louie K, Glimcher PW. Risk preferences impose a hidden distortion on measures of choice impulsivity. PLoS One. 2018; 13(1).

Garfinkel SN, Seth AK, Barrett AB, Suzuki K, Critchley HD. Knowing your own heart: Distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biol Psychol. 2015;104:65–74.

Herman AM, Critchley HD, Duka T. Risk-Taking and Impulsivity: The Role of Mood States and Interoception. Front Psychol. 2018;9.

Moretta T, Sarlo M, Buodo G. Problematic Internet Use: The Relationship Between Resting Heart Rate Variability and Emotional Modulation of Inhibitory Control. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019;22(7):500–507.

Gelpi R, Buchholz B. Neurocardiología. Aspectos fisiopatológicos e implicaciones clínicas. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2018.

Rae CL, Ahmad A, Larsson DEO, Silva M, Praag CDGV, Garfinkel SN, et al. Impact of cardiac interoception cues and confidence on voluntary decisions to make or withhold action in an intentional inhibition task. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1).

Letcher P, Greenwood CJ, Romaniuk H, Spry E, Macdonald JA, McAnally H, et al. Adolescent and young adult mental health problems and infant offspring behavior: Findings from a prospective intergenerational cohort study. J Affect Disord. 2020;272:521–528.

Zhang S, Tsai SJ, Hu S, Xu J, Chao HH, Calhoun VD, et al. Independent component analysis of functional networks for response inhibition: Inter-subject variation in stop signal reaction time. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;36(9):3289–3302.

Sabourin AA, Prater JC, Mason NA. Assessment of mental health in doctor of pharmacy students. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019;11(3):243–250.

Annapally SR, Jagannathan A, Kishore T, Thirthalli J, Daliboina M, Channaveerachari NK. Barriers to academic reintegration in students with severe mental disorders: Thematic analysis. Asian J Psychiatr. 2019;45:107–112.

Nofsinger JR, Patterson FM, Shank CA. DecisionMaking, Financial Risk Aversion and Behavioral Biases: The Role of Testosterone and Stress. Econ Hum Biol. 2018;29:1-16.

Dreher JC, Tremblay L. Decision Neuroscience: An Integrative Perspective. London: Academic Press; 2016.

Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141–146.

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467– 473.

Whitehead WE, Drescher VM, Heiman P, Blackwell B. Relation of heart rate control to heartbeat perception. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1977;2(4):317–392.

Kim S, Lee D. Prefrontal cortex and impulsive decision making. Biol Psychiatry. 2011;69(12):1140–1146.

O´Gorman J, Shum D, Bowman C. Assessing cognitive processes. En: Brough P. Advanced research methods for applied psychology. 1st ed. London: Routledge; 2018. p. 135–145.

Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S. Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 2004;28(1):75–105.

Tang Z, Zhang H, Yan A, Qu C. Time Is Money: The Decision Making of Smartphone High Users in Gain and Loss Intertemporal Choice. Front Psychol. 2017;8:363.

Franken IHA, Muris P. Individual differences in decision-making. Pers Individ Dif. 2005;39(5):991– 998.

Robles E, Vargas PA, Bejarano R. Within-subject differences in degree of delay discounting as a function of order of presentation of hypothetical cash rewards. Behav Processes. 2009;81(2):260– 263.

Shead NW, Hodgins DC. Probability discounting of gains and losses: implications for risk attitudes and impulsivity. J Exp Anal Behav. 2009;92(1):1– 16.

Takano Y, Takahashi N, Tanaka D, Hironaka N. Big losses lead to irrational decision-making in gambling situations: relationship between deliberation and impulsivity. PLoS One. 2010;5(2).

Paulsen DJ, Platt ML, Huettel SA, Brannon EM. Decision-making under risk in children, adolescents, and young adults. Front Psychol. 2011;2:72.

Seifert CA, Wulfert E. The effects of realistic reward and risk on simulated gambling behavior. Am J Addict. 2011;20(2):120–126.

Marmurek HHC, Switzer J, D’Alvise J. Impulsivity, Gambling Cognitions, and the Gambler’s Fallacy in University Students. J Gambl Stud. 2015;31(1):197–210.

Poltavski D, Weatherly J. Delay and probability discounting of multiple commodities in smokers and never-smokers using multiple-choice tasks. Behav Pharmacol. 2013;24(8):659–667.

Hayashi Y, Russo CT, Wirth O. Texting while driving as impulsive choice: A behavioral economic analysis. Accid Anal Prev. 2015;83:182– 189.

Sokol-Hessner P, Hartley CA, Hamilton JR, Phelps EA. Interoceptive ability predicts aversion to losses. Cogn Emot. 2015;29(4):695–701.

Yesuf M, Feinberg R. Ambiguity aversion among student subjects: the role of probability interval and emotional parameters. Appl Econ Lett. 2015;23(4):235-238.

Wang Q, Chen C, Cai Y, Li S, Zhao X, Zheng L, et al. Dissociated neural substrates underlying impulsive choice and impulsive action. Neuroimage. 2016;134:540–549.

Bernhardt N, Obst E, Nebe S, Pooseh S, Wurst FM, Weinmann W, et al. Acute alcohol effects on impulsive choice in adolescents. J Psychopharmacol. 2019;33(3):316–325. 65.

Tesch AD, Sanfey AG. Models and Methods in Delay Discounting. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1128(1):90–94.

Damasio AR, Everitt BJ, Bishop D, Roberts AC, Robbins TW, Weiskrantz L. The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B Biol Sci. 1996;351(1346):1413–1420.

Mann L, Harmoni R, Power C, Beswick G, Ormond C. Effectiveness of the GOFER course in decision making for high school students. J Behav Decis Mak. 1988;1(3):159–168.

Pooseh S, Bernhardt N, Guevara A, Huys QJM, Smolka MN. Value-based decision-making battery: A Bayesian adaptive approach to assess impulsive and risky behavior. Behav Res Methods. 2018;50(1):236–249.

Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol. 1995;51(6):768–774.

Dickman SJ. Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity: personality and cognitive correlates. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;58(1):95–102.

Cyders MA, Smith GT, Spillane NS, Fischer S, Annus AM, Peterson C. Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior: development and validation of a measure of positive urgency. Psychol Assess. 2007;19(1):107– 118.

Eysenck SB, Eysenck HJ. Impulsiveness and venturesomeness: Their position in a dimensional system of personality description. Psychol Rep. 1978;43(3):1247–1255.

Bhatt R, Williams D, Koeing J, Thayer J. Heart rate variability predicts the outcome of risk taking behavior in judgment and decision-making. Psychosom Med. 2015;77(3):90–111.

Woodward ND, Cascio CJ. Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Psychiatric Disorders. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(8):743-744.

Hayashi Y, Rivera EA, Modico JG, Foreman AM, Wirth O. Texting while driving, executive function, and impulsivity in college students. Accid Anal Prev. 2017;102:72-80.

Reddy LF, Lee J, Davis MC, Altshuler L, Glahn DC, Miklowitz DJ, et al. Impulsivity and risk taking in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014;39(2):456-463.

Upton DJ, Bishara AJ, Ahn WY, Stout JC. Propensity for risk taking and trait impulsivity in the Iowa Gambling Task. Pers Individ Dif. 2011;50(4):492-495.

Israel A, Rosenboim M, Shavit T. Using priming manipulations to affect time preferences and risk aversion: An experimental study. J Behav Exp Econ. 2014;53:36–43.

Gosling CJ, Moutier S. Is the framing effect a framing affect?. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019;72(6):1412–1421.

Korn CW, Heekeren HR, Oganian Y. The framing effect in a monetary gambling task is robust in minimally verbal language switching contexts. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019;72(1):52–59.

Belin D, Campbell EJ, Morein-Zamir S, Zorrilla EP, Koob GF. Impulsivity Derived From the Dark Side: Neurocircuits That Contribute to Negative Urgency. Front Behav Neurosci. 2019;13.

Herman AM, Critchley HD, Duka T. Risk-taking and impulsivity: The role of mood states and interoception. Front Psychol. 2018;9.

Li G, Zhang S, Le TM, Tang X, Li C-SR. Neural Responses to Reward in a Gambling Task: Sex Differences and Individual Variation in RewardDriven Impulsivity. Cereb Cortex Commun. 2020;1(1).

Onagawa R, Shinya M, Ota K, Kudo K. Risk aversion in the adjustment of speed-accuracy tradeoff depending on time constraints. Sci Rep. 2019;9.

Yamamoto H, Shinya M, Kudo K. Cognitive Bias for the Distribution of Ball Landing Positions in Amateur Tennis Players (Cognitive Bias for the Motor Variance in Tennis). J Mot Behav. 2019;51(2):141–150.

Zhang H, Daw ND, Maloney LT. Testing whether humans have an accurate model of their own motor uncertainty in a speeded reaching task. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(5).

Gardner M, Steinberg L. Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: an experimental study. Dev Psychol. 2005;41(4):625–635.

Myerson J, Green L. Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1995;64(3):263–276.

Nigg JT. Annual Research Review: On the relations among self-regulation, self-control, executive functioning, effortful control, cognitive control, impulsivity, risk-taking, and inhibition for developmental psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017;58(4):361–383.

Kirby KN, Maraković NN. Modeling Myopic Decisions: Evidence for Hyperbolic DelayDiscounting within Subjects and Amounts. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1995;64(1):22–30.

Stott HP. Cumulative prospect theory’s functional menagerie. J Risk Uncertain. 2006;32(2):101–130.

Hanel PHP, Vione KC. Do Student Samples Provide an Accurate Estimate of the General Public? PLoS One. 2016;11(12).

Murphy J, Catmur C, Bird G. Classifying individual differences in interoception: Implications for the measurement of interoceptive awareness. Psychon Bull Rev. 2019;26(5):1467–1471.

Zamariola G, Maurage P, Luminet O, Corneille O. Interoceptive accuracy scores from the heartbeat counting task are problematic: Evidence from simple bivariate correlations. Biol Psychol. 2018;137:12–17.

Attema AE, Brouwer WBF, L’Haridon O. Prospect theory in the health domain: a quantitative assessment. J Health Econ. 2013;32(6):1057– 1065.

Pinna T, Edwards DJ. A Systematic Review of Associations Between Interoception, Vagal Tone, and Emotional Regulation: Potential Applications for Mental Health, Wellbeing, Psychological Flexibility, and Chronic Conditions. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1792.

John A, Orkin K. Can Simple Psychological Interventions Increase Preventive Health Investment? J Eur Econ Assoc. 2022;20(3):1001– 1047.

Cabedo-Peris J, González-Sala F, Merino-Soto C, Pablo JÁC, Toledano-Toledano F. Decision Making in Addictive Behaviors Based on Prospect Theory: A Systematic Review. Healthcare. 2022;10(9):1659.

Choquette EM, Forthman KL, Kirlic N, Stewart JL, Cannon MJ, Akeman E, et al. Impulsivity, Trauma History, and Interoceptive Awareness Contribute to Completion of a Criminal Diversion Substance Use Treatment Program for Women. SSRN. 2022.

Morley RH. The Impact of Mindfulness Meditation and Self-Compassion on Criminal Impulsivity in a Prisoner Sample. J Police Crim Psychol. 2018;33(2):118–122.

Titov S, Pluzhnik E. Neuroeconomics and Management Educations: Perspectives for New Applications and Approaches. SHS Web Conf. 2016;29.

Saposnik G. Applying Behavioral Economics and Neuroeconomics to Medical Education and Clinical Care. Can J Neurol Sci. 2019;46(1):35–37.

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Derechos de autor 2023 Médicas UIS

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.