Abstract
Introduction: the demand for electric power, goes hand in hand with the population increasing, to satisfy it, the power generation capacity must be ensured, this would encourage the construction of thermal plants; increasing the exposition of workers to the thermoelectric plant dangers. This review aims to identify which risks and dangers in thermoelectric plants have been studied in the world for the period 2007-2017. Objective: identify the main hazards to which thermoelectric workers are exposed through a literature review. Materials and methods: a systematic review was carried out taking into account the recommendations of the PRISMA guide, studies were taken into account about the risk factors to which thermal power plant operations personnel are exposed; Two algorithms with DeCS and MeSH descriptors were established in the Scopus, PubMed, Scient Direct and Google academic databases, with 21 publications meeting the inclusion criteria. Results: the most relevant hazards for thermoelectric workers are physical, ergonomic, chemical, biological and psychosocial. Conclusion: thermoelectric workers are exposed to various hazards that may increase the risk of respiratory, musculoskeletal, hearing loss, cancer, leukemia and its variety, pericarditis, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, genetic and cellular damage; It could also be evidenced that the effect on health by exposure in magnetic fields requires more in-depth studies.
References
2. Ministerio de Minas de Colombia. Nuevo plan de expansión eléctrico mantiene impulso renovable. Bogotá 2017 marzo 21 (internet). Bogotá: UPME. http://www.upme.gov.co/Comunicados/2017/Comunicado_UPME_02_2017.pdf
3. García S. Operación y mantenimiento de centrales ciclo combinado. Madrid, España: Díaz de Santos; 2008.
4. Sorahan T, Kheifets L. Mortality from Alzheimer’s, motor neuron and Parkinson’s disease in relation to magnetic field exposure: findings from the study of UK electricity generation and transmission workers, 1973-2004. Occup Environ Med. 2007; 64(12), 820-826.doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2006.031559
5. Celik M, Donbak L, Unal F, Yüzbasioglu D, Aksoy H, Yilmaz S. (2007). Cytogenetic damage in workers from a coal-fired power plant. Mutat Res. 2007; 627(2), 158-163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.11.003
6. Rohr AC, Campleman SL, Long CM, Peterson MK, Weatherstone S, Quick W, et al. Potential occupational exposures and health risks associated with biomass-based power generation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015; 12(7), 8542-8605. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120708542
7. Felten MK, Knoll L, Eisenhawer C, Ackermann D, Khatab K, Hüdepohl J et al. Retrospective exposure assessment to airborne asbestos among power industry workers. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2010; 5(15), 1-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-5-15
8. Zbikowska E, Kletkiewicz H, Walczak M, Burkowska A. Coexistence of Legionella pneumophila bacteria and free-living amoebae in lakes serving as a cooling system of a power plant. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2014; 225(8): 2066. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2066-y
9. Jumpponen M, Rönkkömäki H, Pasanen P, Laitinen J. Occupational exposure to gases, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds in biomass-fired power plants. Chemosphere. 2013; 90(3): 1289-1293. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.10.001
10. Sorahan T. Magnetic fields and leukaemia risks in uk electricity supply workers. Occup Med (Lond). 2014; 64(3): 150-156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqu002
11. Sorahan T, Mohammed N. Neurodegenerative disease and magnetic field exposure in UK electricity supply workers. Occup Med (Lond). 2014; 64(6): 454-460. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqu105
12. Jumpponen M, Rönkkömäki H, Pasanen P, Laitinen J. Occupational exposure to solid chemical agents in biomass-fired power plants and associated health effects. Chemosphere.2014; 104, 25-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.025
13. García PV, Linhares D, Amaral AFS, Rodrigues AS. Exposure of thermoelectric power-plant workers to volatile organic compounds from fuel oil: genotoxic and cytotoxic effects in buccal epithelial cells. Muta Res. 2012; 747(2), 197-201. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.05.008
14. Rodriguez-Garcia JA, Ramos F. High incidence of acute leukemia in the proximity of some industrial facilities in el Bierzo, northwestern Spain. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2012; 25(1): 22-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13382-012-0010-1
15. Kawalkar UG, Kakrani V, Nagaonkar S, Vedpathak VL, Dahire PL, Kogade, PG. Morbidity profile of employees working in a thermal power station parali. Natl J Community Med. 2014; 5(2), 161-164.
16. Guida HFS, Brito J, Alvarez D. Gestão do trabalho, saúde e segurança dos trabalhadores de termelétricas: um olhar sob o ponto de vista da atividade. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2013; 18(11), 3125-3136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232013001100003
17. Braga C, Rodrigues V, Campos J, De Souza A, Minette LJ, De Moraes AC et al. Evaluation of thermal overload in boiler operators. Work. 2012; 41(1), 470-475. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0198-470
18. Abejie BA, Chung EH, Nesto RW, Kales SN. Grand rounds: asbestos-related pericarditis in a boiler operator. Environ Health Perspect. 2008; 116(1), 86-89. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10354
19. Laitinen J, Koponen H, Sippula O, Korpijärvi K, Jumpponen M, Laitinen S et al. Peak exposures to main components of ash and gaseous diesel exhausts in closed and open ash loading stations at biomass-fuelled power plants. Chemosphere. 2017; 185, 183-191. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.07.012
20. Ugarte-Avilés T, Manterola C, Cartes-Velásquez R, Otzen, T. Impact of proximity of thermoelectric power plants on bronchial obstructive crisis rates. BMC Public Health. 2017; 17(1), 1-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-4008-7
21. Miller RD, Neuberger JS, Gerald KB. Brain cancer and leukemia and exposure to power-frequency (50- to 60-Hz) electric and magnetic fields. Epidemiol Rev. 1997; 19(2), 273-293. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a017958
22. Miller AB, Wall C, Agnew DA, Green LM. Leukemia following occupational exposure to 60-Hz electric and magnetic fields among Ontario electric utility workers and Cancer risks associated with occupational exposure to magnetic fields among electric utility workers in Ontario and Quebec, Canada. Am J Epidemiol.1997; 145(6), 567-568. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008902
23. Miranda R, Llanes JS, Perdomo M. Defensa en profundidad para la evaluación de riesgos laborales por ruido en termoeléctrica. Med Segur Trab. 2015; 61(240): 354-366. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S0465-546X2015000300005
24. Agnihotri VK, Dandotiya DS, Agrawal SK. A total ergonomics model for integration of Health, safety and work to improve productivity of thermal Power Plants. Int J Modern Eng Res. 2013; 3(4), 1890-1893. doi: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1065519.v1
25. Miranda R, Pell S, Llanes JS, Perdomo M. Laborales por escalones de defensa en termoeléctrica de 100 mw s ld 200. Informatica. 2013; http://www.informatica2013.sld.cu/index.php/informaticasalud/2013/paper/view/422/40.
26. Argudo A. Análisis de las publicaciones en el tema de la presbicia. (p.p 7). Alicante, España. Universidad de Alicante; 2015.
27. Broussard G, Bramanti O, Marchese FM. Occupational risk and toxicology evaluations of industrial water conditioning. Occupational Medicine.1997; 47(6), 337-340. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/47.6.337
28. Carin Febres-Cordero Phelan A, Guédez V. Diagnóstico de riesgos psicosociales en proyecto chino-venezolano: construcción planta termoeléctrica. Orp J. 2016; 6, 3-10. http://www.orpjournal.com/index.php/ORPjournal/article/view/42.
29. Erdal N, Erdal ME, Gurgul S. Lack of effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibitor gene p18(INK4C) in electric energy workers. Arch Med Res. 2005; 36(2): 120-123. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2004.12.015.
30. Felipe Sexto L. Análisis de ruido en áreas de la central termoeléctrica Habana. Ing Mecánica. 2002; 5(3): 25-29. http://www.ingenieriamecanica.cujae.edu.cu/index.php/revistaim/article/view/289/629.
31. Colombia. Ministerio de trabajo. Decreto 1607 de 2002. Por el cual se modifica la tabla de clasificación de actividades económicas para el sistema general de riesgos profesionales.
32. Nakagawa M. A study on extremely low-frequency electric and magnetic fields and cancer: Discussion of EMF safety limits. J Occup Health.1997; 39(1), 18-28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.39.18
33. Portafolio. Habrá cinco plantas térmicas al 2018 en el país. http://www.portafolio.co/negocios/empresas/habra-cinco-plantas-termicas-2018-pais-113288.
34. Tebsa. Termobarranquilla S.A E.S.P. Somos Tebsa. https://www.tebsa.com.co/somos-tebsa/.
35. XM. Compañía expertos en mercado. S. A E.S.P. Consumo. Pronóstico de demanda. https://www.xm.com.co/Paginas/Consumo/pronostico-de-demanda.aspx
36. XM. Compañía expertos en mercado. S.A E.S.P. informe general del mercado enero de 2018. https://www.xm.com.co/Informes%20Mensuales%20de%20Anlisis%20del%20Mercado/00_General_Mercado_01_2018.pdf
37. Zuzewicz K, Konarska M. The effect of age and time of a 24-hour period on accidents at work in operators. Int Congress Series. 2005; 1280: 333-338. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.02.083
38. Gurney JG, Van Wijngaarden E. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (EMF) and brain cancer in adults and children: review and comment. Neuro Oncol. 1999; 1(3), 212-220. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093%2Fneuonc%2F1.3.212
39. Vangelova K, Deyanov C, Israel M. Cardiovascular risk in operators under radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2006; 209(2), 133-138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2005.09.008
40. Luksamijarulkul P, Kornkrerkkiat S, Saranpuetti C, Sujirarat D. Predictive factors of Legionella pneumophila contamination in cooling tower water. Air Soil Water Res. 2014; 7(7), 11-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.4137%2FASWR.S12972
41. McCurdy AL, Wijnberg L, Loomis D, Savitz D, Nylander-French LA. Exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields among working women and homemakers. The Annals Occup Hyg. 2001; 45(8): 643-650. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4878(01)00034-5
42. Vaasma T, Kaasik M, Loosaar J, Kiisk M, Tkaczyk AH. Long-term modelling of fly ash and radionuclide emissions as well as deposition fluxes due to the operation of large oil shale-fired power plants. J Environ Radioact. 2017; 178-179: 232-244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.08.017
43. Mancuso V, Giacobbe F, Faranda F, Diaco T. Integrated, health, safety and environmental management system. Case study of power plant. Chem Engine Transactions. 2014; 36: 313-318. doi: https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1436053
44. Vangelova K, Israel M, Mihaylov S. The effect of low level radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on the excretion rates of stress hormones in operators during 24-hour shifts. Cent Eur J Public Health.2002; 10(1-2): 24-28. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12096679/
45. Lolea M, Dzitac S. Aspects regarding the practical evaluation of the exposure level in electric and magnetic. ANNALS Fac Engine Hunedoara Int J Engine. 2016; 4: 129-138. http://annals.fih.upt.ro/pdf-full/2016/ANNALS-2016-4-19.pdf
46. Pesch B, Ranft V, Jakubis P, Niewenhuijsen MJ, Hergemoller A, Unfried et al. Environmental arsenic exposure from a coal-burning power plant as a potential risk factor for non-melanoma skin cancer: results from a case-control study in the district of Prievidza, Slovakia. Am J Epidemiol. 2002; 155(9), 798-809. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/155.9.798
47. Kelsh MA, Sahl JD. (1997). Mortality among a cohort of electric utility workers, 1960-1991. Am J Ind Med. 1997; 31(5): 534-544. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199705)31:5<534::AID-AJIM6>3.0.CO;2-T
48. Volberg V, Fordyce T, Leonhard M, Mezei G, Vergara X, Krishen L. Injuries among electric power industry workers, 1995-2013. J Safety Res. 2017, 60: 9-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2016.11.001
Se autoriza la reproducción total o parcial de la obra para fines educativos, siempre y cuando se cite la fuente.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Pública Internacional.