Construct Validity and Reliability of the Family APGAR in Adult Dental Patients from Cartagena, Colombia
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

Keywords

Family
psychometrics
epidemiology
APGAR score

How to Cite

Díaz Cárdenas, S., Tirado Amador, L., & Simancas Pallares, M. (2017). Construct Validity and Reliability of the Family APGAR in Adult Dental Patients from Cartagena, Colombia. Salud UIS, 49(4), 541–548. https://doi.org/10.18273/revsal.v49n4-2017003

Abstract

Objective: To determine construct validity and reliability of the family APGAR scale in dental adult patients from Cartagena, Colombia. Methods: Scale validation study without a reference criterion in 227 patients between 22 and 94 years old whom consulted a college-based dental clinic. Family APGAR data was obtained from the family health charts. Internal consistency was calculated with the Kuder-Richardson formula 20 and construct validity by means of exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Fit indexes were obtained from CFA: χ2; p-value for χ2; degrees of freedom (df); root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA); comparative fit index (CFI) and Tucker-Lewis index (TLI). Data analysis was performed using Stata v.13.2 for Windows (StataCorp, TX, US) and Mplus v.7.31 for Windows (Muthén & Muthén, LA, US). Results: Family APGAR overall score was 17,07±3,15 and prevalence of family dysfunction was 44,4% (95% CI: 38 – 51%). Internal consistency was 0,90. EFA showed a single factor that accounted 64,1% of total variance. CFA showed as fit indexes: χ2=702,960; df=10, χ2 p-value=0.001; RMSEA=0.155 (90% CI: 0.107-0.209); CFI=0.961; TLI=0.922. Conclusions: Family APGAR in Cartagena dental adult patients seems to be a highly valuable screening instrument with excellent internal consistency but questionable construct validity. Additional studies must be conducted in order to obtain scales with adequate psychometric properties for construct measurement. 

https://doi.org/10.18273/revsal.v49n4-2017003
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

References

1. Bellón Saameño JA, Delgado Sánchez A, Luna del Castillo JdD, Lardelli Claret P. Validez y fiabiliad del cuestionario de función familiar Apgar familiar. Atención Prim. 1996; 18(6): 289-96.

2. Arias L, Herrera JA. El APGAR familiar en el cuidado primario de la salud. Colombia Médica. 1994; 25(1): 16-28.

3. Sanders AE, Slade GD. Apgar score and dental caries risk in the primary dentition of five year olds. Aust Dent J. 2010; 55(3): 260-267.

4. Díaz-Cárdenas S, Arrieta-Vergara K, Ramos-Martínez K. Funcionalidad familiar y caries dental en niños de una institución educativa de Cartagena de Indias. Rev Col Inv Odontol. 2015; 16(6): 41-49.

5. Díaz-Cárdenas S, Tirado-Amador L, Madera-Anaya M. Odontología con enfoque en salud familiar. Rev Cub Salud Pública. 2014; 40(3): 397-405.

6. Smilkstein G. The family APGAR: a proposal for a family function test and its use by physicians. J Fam Pract. 1978; 6(6): 1231-1239.

7. Smilkstein G, Ashworth C, Montano D. Validity and reliability of the family APGAR as a test of family function. J Fam Pract. 1982; 15(2): 303-311.

8. Castilla Cabello H, Caycho Rodríguez T, Ventura León J, Palomino-Barboza M, De La Cruz Valles M. Análisis factorial confirmatorio de la escala de percepción de funcionamiento familiar de Smilkstein en adolescentes peruanos. Sal
Sociedad. 2015; 6(2): 140-153.

9. da Silva MJ, Fonseca Victor J, do Nascimento Mota FR, Silva Soares E, Belém Leite BM, Teixeira Oliveira E. Analysis of psychometric properties of family APGAR with elderly in northeast Brazil. Es Anna Nery. 2014; 2014(18): 3.

10. Díaz-Cárdenas S, Arrieta-Vergara K, González-Martínez F. Violencia intrafamiliar y factores de riesgo en mujeres afrodescendientes de la ciudad de Cartagena. Rev Clín Med Famil. 2015; 8(1):19-30.

11. Díaz-Cárdenas S, Arrieta-Vergara K, González-Martínez F. Estrés académico y funcionalidad familiar en estudiantes de odontología. Sal Uninorte. 2014; 30(2): 121-132.

12. Sanchez R, Echeverry J. Validating scales used for measuring factors in medicine. Rev Salud Publica. 2004; 6(3): 302-318.
13. Harrington D. Confirmatory Factor Analysis. 1 ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009. 121. 14. Simancas-Pallares MA, Díaz-Cárdenas S, Barbosa-Gómez P, Buendía-Vergara MB, Arévalo-Tovar LL. Propiedades psicométricas del Índice de Bienestar General-5 de la Organización Mundial de la Salud en pacientes parcialmente edéntulos. Rev Fac Med. 2016; 64(4): 701-705.

15. Simancas-Pallares M, Arrieta KM, Arévalo LL. Validez de constructo y consistencia interna de tres estructuras factoriales y dos sistemas de puntuación del Cuestionario General de Salud–12. Biomédica. 2017; 37(3).

16. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa1976). 2000; 25(24): 3186-3191.

17. Forero Ariza LM, Avendaño Durán MC, Duarte Cubillos ZJ, Campo-Arias A. Consistencia interna y análisis de factores de la escala APGAR para evaluar el funcionamiento familiar en estudiantes de básica secundaria. Rev Col Psiquiatría. 2006; 35(1): 23-29.

18. Kline P. Handbook of psychological testing: Routledge; 2013.

19. Tom AB, Bosker RJ. Multilevel Analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. 2nd ed. Stawski RS, editor. Los Angeles, CA.: Sage; 2012. 354.

20. Costello AB, Osborne, J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Res Evaluation. 2005; 10(7): 1-9.

21. Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Second ed. Boston, MA, USA: Guilford Publications; 2015.

22. Li CH. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res Methods. 2016; 48(3): 936-949.

23. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria
versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal. 1999; 6(1):1-55.

24. Castilla H, Caycho T, Shimabukuro M, Valdivia A. Percepción del funcionamiento familiar: análisis psicométrico de la escala APGAR familiar en adolescentes de Lima. Propos Representaciones. 2014; 2(1): 49-78.

25. Prazeres F, Santiago L. Relationship between health-related quality of life, perceived family support and unmet health needs in adult patients with multimorbidity attending primary care in Portugal: a multicentre cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016; 14(1): 156.

26. Pless IB, Satterwhite B. A measure of family functioning and its application. Soc Sci Med. 1973; 7(8): 613-620.

27. Edman SO, Cole DA, Howard GS. Convergent and discriminant validity of FACES-III: family adaptability and cohesion. Fam Process. 1990; 29(1): 95-103.

28. Epstein N, Baldwin L, Bishop D. The McMaster family assessment device. J Mar Fam Therapy. 1983; 9(2):171-180.

29. Reyes Romagosa DE, Torres Pérez I, Quesada Oliva LM, Milá Fernández M, Labrada Estrada HE. Hábitos bucales deformantes en niños de 5 a 11 años. Medisan. 2014; 18(5): 606-612.

30. Reisine ST, Psoter W. Socioeconomic status and selected behavioral determinants as risk factors for
dental caries. J Dent Educ. 2001; 65(10): 1009-1016.

31. Han SH, Kim B, Lee SA, Korean Qo LiESG. Contribution of the family environment to depression in Korean adults with epilepsy. Seizure. 2015; 25: 26-31.

32. Lee MK, Yun YH. Family Functioning predicts. end-of-life care quality in patients with cancer: Multicenter prospective cohort study. Cancer Nurs. 2017.

33. Herrera Santí PM. La familia funcional y disfuncional, un indicador de salud. Rev Cubana Med Gen Integr. 1997; 13(6): 591-595.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.