Abstract
The objective of this article is to analyze the products consumed by Colombian households, based on their socioeconomic conditions. The methodology used is quantitative: 1. Descriptive analysis and 2. Cluster analysis, Ward link. For this, the Household Budget survey, carried out by the Colombian National Statistics Department for 2017, will be used. The hypothesis that guides this article is: the food products consumed by households are different from each other, given their socioeconomic characteristics. The results show two large groups of household typologies: those that consume food mainly outside the home or ready-made products; and those households that distribute their household budget in food to prepare. And within those households that spend their food budget on food to prepare, 3 main groups were found. The results show social stratification and changes in the food practices of Colombian households.
References
1. Bourdieu P. La Distinción. Madrid: Grupo Santillana de Ediciones; 1998.
2. Grignon C, Grignon C. Styles d’alimentation et goûts populaires. Rev Française Sociolog. 1980; 21(4): 531-569. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3320833
3. Grignon C, Grignon C. Alimentation et stratification social. Cahiers Nutrition et Diététique, 1981; 16: 207-217.
4. Darmon N, Drewnowski A. Does social class predict diet quality?. Am J Clin Nutrition. 2008; 87(5): 1107-1117. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.5.1107
5. Sánchez-Villegas A, Martínez JA, Prättäla R, Toledo E, Roos G, Martínez-González MA. A systematic review of socioeconomic differences in food habits in Europe: Consumption of cheese and milk. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003; 57: 917-929. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601626
6. Andrieu E, Darmon N, Drewnowski A. Low-cost diets: more energy, fewer nutrients. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006; 60: 434-436. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602331
7. De Irala-Estévez J, Groth M, Johansson L, Oltersdorf U, Prättäla R, Martínez-González, MA. A systematic review of socioeconomic differences in food habits in Europe: Consumption of fruit and vegetables. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000; 54: 706-714. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601080
8. Drewnoski A, Monsivais P, Maillot M, Darmon N. Low-energy-density diets are associated with higher diet quality and higher diet costs in French adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007; 107(6): 1028-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.03.013
9. López-Azpiazu I, Sánchez-Villegas A, Johansson L, Petkeviciene J, Prättäla R, Martínez-González MA. Disparities in food habits in Europe: systematic review of educational and occupational differences in the intake of fat. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2003; 16(5): 349-364. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-277x.2003.00466.x.
10. Harris M. Bueno para comer. Madrid: Alianza Editorial; 2009.
11. Steiner Ph. La sociologie économique. Paris: La Découvert; 2011.
12. Reckwitz A. Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. Eur J Soc Theo. 2002; 5(2): 243-263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
13. Schatzki TR, Knorr Cetina K, von Savignay E. (Editores.) The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge; 2001.
14. Weber, M. Economía y Sociedad: Esbozo de sociología comprensiva. España: Fondo de Cultura Económica; 2002.
15. Dubuisson-Quellier S. Le prestataire, le client et le consommateur. Sociologie d'une relation marchande. RevFrançaise Sociolog. 1999; 40(4): 671-688. doi: 10.2307/3322854
16. Poulain JP. Sociologies de l’alimentation: Les mangeurs et l'espace social alimentaire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 2002.
17. Régnier F, Lhuissier A, Gojard S. Sociologie de l’alimentation. Paris: La Découverte; 2006.
18. Kamphuis C, Jansen T, Mackenbach J, van Lenthe F. Bourdieu's Cultural Capital in Relation to Food Choices: A Systematic Review of Cultural Capital Indicators and an Empirical Proof of Concept. PLoS ONE, 2015; 10(8): 1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130695
19. Wills, W., Backett, K., Roberts, M-L., & Lawton, J. The framing of social class distinctions through family foods and eating practices. Socio Rev. 2011; 59(4): 725-740. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.02035.x
20. Beagan B, Chapman G, Power, E. Cultural and symbolic capital with and without economic constraint: Food shopping in low-income and high-income Canadian families. Food, Cult & Soc. 2016; 19(1): 45-70. doi: 10.1080/15528014.2016.1145002
21. Baumann S, Szabo M, Johnston, J. Understanding the food preferences of people of low socio-economic status. J Consu Cult. 2017; 1-24. doi: 10.1177/1469540517717780.
22. De Saint Pol T. Les évolutions de l’alimentation et de sa sociologie au regard des inégalités sociales. L’Année sociolog. 2017; 67(1): 11-22. doi: 10.3917/anso.171.0011
23. Van Lenthe F, Jansen T, Kamphuis C. Understanding socio-economic inequalities in food choice behaviour: can Maslow's pyramid help?. Brit J Nutr. 2015; 113: 1139-1147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114515000288
24. Bertollo M, Martire Y, Rovirosa A, Zapata M.E. Patrones de consumo de alimentos y bebidas según los ingresos del hogar de acuerdo a los datos de Encuesta Nacional de Gastos de los Hogares (ENGHo) del año 2012-213. Diaeta, 2015; 33(153): 7-18.
25. Garza-Montoya BG, Ramos-Tovar ME. Cambios en los patrones de gasto en alimentos y bebidas de hogares mexicanos (1984-2014). Sal Púb Mex. 2017; 59(6): 612-620. doi: 10.21149/8220
26. Rodríguez E, Berges M, Casellas K. Diferencias regionales en el consumo de alimentos de los hogares argentinos. Rev Arg Eco Agra. 2001; 4(1): 3-12.
27. Torres Pabon G. ¿En qué gastamos para comer y cuánto?: condiciones socioeconómicas y presupuesto para el consumo de alimentos. Rev Col Sociolo. 2019; 42(2): 191-228. doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/rcs.v42n2.74809
28. Zapata, M.E., Rovirosa, A. & Carmuega, E. Cambios en el patrón de consumo de alimentos y bebidas en Argentina, 1996-2013. Sal Colec. 2016; 12(4): 473-486. doi: https://doi.org/10.18294/sc.2016.936
29. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor D, Lynch J, Smith, G.D. Indicators of socio-economic position (Part 1). J EpiComm Heal. 2006; 60: 7-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.023531
30. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor D, Lynch J, Smith, G.D. Indicators of socio-economic position (Part 2). J EpiComm Heal. 2006; 60: 7-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.023531
31. Lallukka T, Laaksonen M, Rahkonen O, Roos E, Lahelma E. Multiple socio-economic circumstances and healthy food habits. Eur JClin Nutr. 2007; 61: 701-710. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602583
32. Euromonitor International. Consumer Foodservice in Colombia: Country report (en línea). www.euromonitor.com, último acceso 20 de abril de 2018.
33. Van den Eeckhout P. The history of labour and labour relations in hotel and restaurants in Western Europe and the United Stated in the 19th and 20th centuries. Food & Hist. 2013; 11(2): 199-377. doi: https://doi.org/10.1484/J.FOOD.5.102110
34. Encuesta Nacional de la Situación Nutricional. Jóvenes y Adultos 18 a 64 años. https://www.icbf.gov.co/sites/default/files/portada-ensin6.jpg
35. Warde A. Consumption, food and taste: Culinary antinomies and commodity culture. London: SAGE Publications; 1997.
36. Herrán O, Patiño G, Zea MP. Patrones de consumo alimentario y pobreza monetaria en Colombia. Rev Chil Nutr. 2018; 4: 372-380. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75182018000500372
37. Herrán O, Patiño GA, Del Castillo SE. La transición alimentaria y el exceso de peso en adultos evaluados con base en la Encuesta de la Salud Nutricional en Colombia, 2010. Biomédica, 2016, 36: 109-120. doi: https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v36i1.2579
2. Grignon C, Grignon C. Styles d’alimentation et goûts populaires. Rev Française Sociolog. 1980; 21(4): 531-569. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3320833
3. Grignon C, Grignon C. Alimentation et stratification social. Cahiers Nutrition et Diététique, 1981; 16: 207-217.
4. Darmon N, Drewnowski A. Does social class predict diet quality?. Am J Clin Nutrition. 2008; 87(5): 1107-1117. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.5.1107
5. Sánchez-Villegas A, Martínez JA, Prättäla R, Toledo E, Roos G, Martínez-González MA. A systematic review of socioeconomic differences in food habits in Europe: Consumption of cheese and milk. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003; 57: 917-929. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601626
6. Andrieu E, Darmon N, Drewnowski A. Low-cost diets: more energy, fewer nutrients. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006; 60: 434-436. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602331
7. De Irala-Estévez J, Groth M, Johansson L, Oltersdorf U, Prättäla R, Martínez-González, MA. A systematic review of socioeconomic differences in food habits in Europe: Consumption of fruit and vegetables. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000; 54: 706-714. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601080
8. Drewnoski A, Monsivais P, Maillot M, Darmon N. Low-energy-density diets are associated with higher diet quality and higher diet costs in French adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007; 107(6): 1028-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.03.013
9. López-Azpiazu I, Sánchez-Villegas A, Johansson L, Petkeviciene J, Prättäla R, Martínez-González MA. Disparities in food habits in Europe: systematic review of educational and occupational differences in the intake of fat. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2003; 16(5): 349-364. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-277x.2003.00466.x.
10. Harris M. Bueno para comer. Madrid: Alianza Editorial; 2009.
11. Steiner Ph. La sociologie économique. Paris: La Découvert; 2011.
12. Reckwitz A. Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. Eur J Soc Theo. 2002; 5(2): 243-263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
13. Schatzki TR, Knorr Cetina K, von Savignay E. (Editores.) The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge; 2001.
14. Weber, M. Economía y Sociedad: Esbozo de sociología comprensiva. España: Fondo de Cultura Económica; 2002.
15. Dubuisson-Quellier S. Le prestataire, le client et le consommateur. Sociologie d'une relation marchande. RevFrançaise Sociolog. 1999; 40(4): 671-688. doi: 10.2307/3322854
16. Poulain JP. Sociologies de l’alimentation: Les mangeurs et l'espace social alimentaire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 2002.
17. Régnier F, Lhuissier A, Gojard S. Sociologie de l’alimentation. Paris: La Découverte; 2006.
18. Kamphuis C, Jansen T, Mackenbach J, van Lenthe F. Bourdieu's Cultural Capital in Relation to Food Choices: A Systematic Review of Cultural Capital Indicators and an Empirical Proof of Concept. PLoS ONE, 2015; 10(8): 1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130695
19. Wills, W., Backett, K., Roberts, M-L., & Lawton, J. The framing of social class distinctions through family foods and eating practices. Socio Rev. 2011; 59(4): 725-740. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.02035.x
20. Beagan B, Chapman G, Power, E. Cultural and symbolic capital with and without economic constraint: Food shopping in low-income and high-income Canadian families. Food, Cult & Soc. 2016; 19(1): 45-70. doi: 10.1080/15528014.2016.1145002
21. Baumann S, Szabo M, Johnston, J. Understanding the food preferences of people of low socio-economic status. J Consu Cult. 2017; 1-24. doi: 10.1177/1469540517717780.
22. De Saint Pol T. Les évolutions de l’alimentation et de sa sociologie au regard des inégalités sociales. L’Année sociolog. 2017; 67(1): 11-22. doi: 10.3917/anso.171.0011
23. Van Lenthe F, Jansen T, Kamphuis C. Understanding socio-economic inequalities in food choice behaviour: can Maslow's pyramid help?. Brit J Nutr. 2015; 113: 1139-1147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114515000288
24. Bertollo M, Martire Y, Rovirosa A, Zapata M.E. Patrones de consumo de alimentos y bebidas según los ingresos del hogar de acuerdo a los datos de Encuesta Nacional de Gastos de los Hogares (ENGHo) del año 2012-213. Diaeta, 2015; 33(153): 7-18.
25. Garza-Montoya BG, Ramos-Tovar ME. Cambios en los patrones de gasto en alimentos y bebidas de hogares mexicanos (1984-2014). Sal Púb Mex. 2017; 59(6): 612-620. doi: 10.21149/8220
26. Rodríguez E, Berges M, Casellas K. Diferencias regionales en el consumo de alimentos de los hogares argentinos. Rev Arg Eco Agra. 2001; 4(1): 3-12.
27. Torres Pabon G. ¿En qué gastamos para comer y cuánto?: condiciones socioeconómicas y presupuesto para el consumo de alimentos. Rev Col Sociolo. 2019; 42(2): 191-228. doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/rcs.v42n2.74809
28. Zapata, M.E., Rovirosa, A. & Carmuega, E. Cambios en el patrón de consumo de alimentos y bebidas en Argentina, 1996-2013. Sal Colec. 2016; 12(4): 473-486. doi: https://doi.org/10.18294/sc.2016.936
29. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor D, Lynch J, Smith, G.D. Indicators of socio-economic position (Part 1). J EpiComm Heal. 2006; 60: 7-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.023531
30. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor D, Lynch J, Smith, G.D. Indicators of socio-economic position (Part 2). J EpiComm Heal. 2006; 60: 7-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.023531
31. Lallukka T, Laaksonen M, Rahkonen O, Roos E, Lahelma E. Multiple socio-economic circumstances and healthy food habits. Eur JClin Nutr. 2007; 61: 701-710. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602583
32. Euromonitor International. Consumer Foodservice in Colombia: Country report (en línea). www.euromonitor.com, último acceso 20 de abril de 2018.
33. Van den Eeckhout P. The history of labour and labour relations in hotel and restaurants in Western Europe and the United Stated in the 19th and 20th centuries. Food & Hist. 2013; 11(2): 199-377. doi: https://doi.org/10.1484/J.FOOD.5.102110
34. Encuesta Nacional de la Situación Nutricional. Jóvenes y Adultos 18 a 64 años. https://www.icbf.gov.co/sites/default/files/portada-ensin6.jpg
35. Warde A. Consumption, food and taste: Culinary antinomies and commodity culture. London: SAGE Publications; 1997.
36. Herrán O, Patiño G, Zea MP. Patrones de consumo alimentario y pobreza monetaria en Colombia. Rev Chil Nutr. 2018; 4: 372-380. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75182018000500372
37. Herrán O, Patiño GA, Del Castillo SE. La transición alimentaria y el exceso de peso en adultos evaluados con base en la Encuesta de la Salud Nutricional en Colombia, 2010. Biomédica, 2016, 36: 109-120. doi: https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v36i1.2579
Se autoriza la reproducción total o parcial de la obra para fines educativos, siempre y cuando se cite la fuente.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Pública Internacional.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.