Correlation of EQ-5D and mRS in ischemic stroke: a multicenter cross-sectional study
PDF

Keywords

Quality of life; Disability evaluation; Ischemic stroke; Patient reported outcome measures; Colombia

How to Cite

Garzón-Hernández, J. P., López-Romero, L. A., Mendoza-Sánchez, J. A., Gómez-Franco, R. ., & Silva-Sieger, F. A. (2023). Correlation of EQ-5D and mRS in ischemic stroke: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Salud UIS, 55. https://doi.org/10.18273/saluduis.55.e:23039

Abstract

Introduction: Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL), in addition to evaluating functional status in stroke patients could complement clinician practice. Objective: To assess HRQOL, applying EuroQol-5-dimensions (EQ-5D) in Colombian patients with stroke and correlating its results with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Methods: Analytical cross-sectional study in a cohort of ischemic stroke patients in Colombia at three months as a median follow-up (Q1: 1- Q3:3) after their event. We correlated EQ-5D domains, EQ-5D index, mRS with EQ5D VAS score. We generated a simple linear regression robust model to evaluate the variability between using r2. Results: A total of 91 patients completed the EQ-5D questionnaire, with a mean age of 71.2 years; 59.3% were male. We identified an inverse correlation between EQ-5D VAS and EQ-5D domains with the highest for mobility (rs = -0.69) and the lowest for pain/discomfort (rs -0.52, p<0.001). The r2 ranged from 0.25 (pain/discomfort) to 0.47 (EQ-5D index). Patients with mRS ≥ 3 significantly reduced their EQ-5D VAS score by 25.64 points (95% CI-33.04, -18.24). Variability in EQ-5D VAS scores occurred by EQ-5D index (47%) and by mRS (34%). Conclusions: The correlation between EQ-5D and mRS was favorable. Although EQ-5D and mRS evaluated different spheres on stroke patients, applying the EQ-5D instrument in real-world clinical settings might contribute multidimensional information on how life is affected after a stroke. This kind of information serves to orientate rehabilitation strategies on specific domains such as depression, self-care, anxiety, and pain. This is especially relevant for patients with disabilities (mRS ≥ 3).

https://doi.org/10.18273/saluduis.55.e:23039
PDF

References

Guzik A, Bushnell C. Stroke epidemiology and risk factor management. Continuum (Minneap Minn) [Internet]. 2017; 23(1): 15-39. doi: https://doi. org/10.1212/con.0000000000000416

Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics’2017 update: A Report from the American Heart Association. Circulation [Internet]. 2017; 135: e146-e603. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000000485

Tsalta-Mladenov M, Georgieva D, Andonova S. Measuring quality of life in stroke survivors. Russ Neurol J. 2020; 25(3): 11-16.

Kissela B. The value of quality of life research in stroke. Stroke. 2006; 37: 1958-1959.

De Haan R, Horn J, Limburg M, Van Der Meulen J, Bossuyt P. A comparison of five stroke scales with measures of disability, handicap, and quality of life. Stroke [Internet]. 1993; 24(8): 1178-1181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.24.8.1178

Anderson C, Laubscher S, Burns R. Validation of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients. Stroke. 1996; 27: 1812-1816.

D’Olhaberriague L, Litvan I, Mitsias P, Mansbach HH. A reappraisal of reliability and validity studies in stroke. Stroke [Internet]. 1996; 27(12): 2331-2336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.27.12.2331

European Medicines Agency. Committee for medicinal products for human use. Reflection paper on the regulatory guidance for the use of healthrelated quality of life (HRQL) measures in the evaluation of medicinal products. Doc. Ref. EMA/ CHMP/EWP/139391/2004. London: EMA; 2005.

Reeves M, Lisabeth L, Williams L, Katzan I, Kapral M, Deutsch A, et al. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for acute stroke: Rationale, methods and future directions. Stroke. 2018; 49: 1549-1556.

Golicki D, Niewada M, Karlińska A, Buczek J, Kobayashi A, Janssen MF, et al. Comparing responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L and EQ VAS in stroke patients. Qual Life Res. 2015; 24: 1555-1563.

Deb-Chatterji M, Konnopka A, Flottmann F, Leischner H, Fiehler J, Gerloff C, et al. Patientreported, health-related, quality of life after stroke thrombectomy in clinical practice. Neurology [Internet]. 2020; 95: e1724-e1732. doi: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000010356

Lyden P. Using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Stroke [Internet]. 2017; 48: 513-519. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.116.015434

Bruno A, Shah N, Lin C, Close B, Hess DC, Davis K, et al. Improving modified rankin scale assessment with a simplified questionnaire. Stroke [Internet]. 2010; 41(5): 1048-1050. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.109.571562

Teoh V, Sims J, Milgrom J. Psychosocial predictors of quality of life in a sample of community-dwelling stroke survivors: a longitudinal study. Top Stroke Rehabil [Internet]. 2009; 16(2): 157-166. doi: https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1602-157

Rebchuk AD, O’Neill ZR, Szefer EK, Hill MD, Field TS. Health utility weighting of the modified rankin scale: A systematic review and metaanalysis. JAMA Netw Open [Internet]. 2020; 3(4): e203767. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3767

Stewart JC, Cramer SC. Patient-reported measures provide unique insights into motor function after stroke. Stroke. 2013; 44(4): 1111-1116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.111.674671

Silva-Henao A, Pirela CT, Álvarez-Escobar A, Londoño-Luján M, Alonso LM. Calidad de vida en pacientes post evento cerebrovascular isquémico en dos hospitales de la ciudad de Barranquilla (Colombia). Salud Uninorte. 2009; 25(1): 73-79.

Cano Gutiérrez C, Arciniegas Rubio A, Germán Borda M, Samper Ternent R, Gil Laverde F, Londoño Trujillo D. Perception of health-related quality of life using the EURO-QOL in older adults in Bogotá, Colombia. Eur Geriatr Med. 2016; 7: 340-345.

Sobrinho KRF, Santini ACM, Marques CLS, Gabriel MG, Neto EM, de Souza LAPS, et al. Impact of unilateral spatial neglect on chronic patient’s post-stroke quality of life. Somatosens Mot Res [Internet]. 2018; 35 (3-4): 199-203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2018.1521791

Rumsfeld JS, Alexander KP, Goff Jr. DC, Graham MM, Ho PM, Masoudi FA, et al. Cardiovascular health: the importance of measuring patientreported health status: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation [Internet]. 2013; 127(22): 2233-2249. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182949a2e

Kyte DG, Draper H, Ives J, Liles C, Gheorghe A, Calvert M. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials: is ‘in-trial’ guidance lacking? a systematic review. PLoS One [Internet]. 2013; 8(4): e60684. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060684

Celnik P, Birmbaumer N. How much will I recover, doctor? Some help with an ever-elusive answer. Neurology [Internet]. 2014; 82(3): 192-193. doi: https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000000042

Kozlowski AJ, Singh R, Victorson D, Miskovic A, Lai J-, Harvey RL, et al. Agreement between responses from community-dwelling persons with stroke and their proxies on the NIH Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL) short forms. Arch Phys Med Rehabil [Internet]. 2015; 96(11): 1986-1992. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.07.005

Stinear CM, Lang CE, Zeiler S, Byblow WD. Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2020; 19: 348-360.

Katzan IL, Thompson NR, Uchino K, Lapin B. The most affected health domains after ischemic stroke. Neurology [Internet]. 2018; 90(16): e1364-e1371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000005327

Payton H, Soundy A. The experience of post-stroke pain and the impact on quality of life: An integrative review. Behav Sci [Internet]. 2020; 10(8): 128. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs10080128

Nadarajah M, Goh HT. Post-stroke fatigue: a review on prevalence, correlates, measurement, and management. Top Stroke Rehabil [Internet]. 2015; 22(3): 208-220. doi: https://doi.org/10.1179/1074935714z.0000000015

Pinto EB, Maso I, Pereira JLB, Fukuda TG, Seixas JC, Menezes DF, et al. Differential aspects of stroke and congestive heart failure in quality of life reduction: a case series with three comparison groups. Health Qual Life Outcomes [Internet]. 2011; 9: 65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-65

Katzan IL, Thompson NR, Lapin B, Uchino K. Added value of patient-reported outcome measures in stroke clinical practice. J Am Heart Assoc [Internet]. 2017; 6(7): e005356. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.116.005356

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Jenny Paola Garzón-Hernández, Luis Alberto López-Romero, Jose Alejandro Mendoza-Sánchez, Ricardo Gómez-Franco, Federico Arturo Silva-Sieger

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.