Keywords
Patient-Centered Care
Nursing Methodology Research
Reproducibility of Results
Psychometrics
How to Cite
Abstract
Patient-centered care ensures that during the care they receive, the patient's preferences and needs are respected and taken into consideration. To achieve this, collaboration and interaction between the patient, their family and the various healthcare institution staff is required throughout the different stages of care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Individualized Care Scale, Patient version (ICS-Patient) in Spanish. A Methodological research in nursing was conducted. The sample of participants corresponded to 170 patients admitted to the hospitalization services of a university health service provider in the city of Bogotá. The Colombian version of ICS-Patient presented acceptability indices for face validity higher than 0,80 and satisfactory content validity indices per item in 91% of the items evaluated. The factor analysis of ICS-Patient revealed a 2-factor solution for part A and a 3-factor solution for part B that explained 56,90% and 60,40% of the variance respectively. The ICS-Patient presented acceptable values of internal consistency in each of its parts (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient Part A: 0,935 - Part B: 0,919). The Colombian version of the ICS-Paciente was found to be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing individualized nursing care received by hospitalized adult patients.
References
Wolf D, Lehman L, Quinlin R, Rosenzweig M, Friede S, Zullo T, et al. Can nurses impact patient outcomes using a patient-centered care model? J Nurs Adm. 2008; 38(12): 532–540. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/nna.0b013e31818ebf4f
Köberich S, Farin E. A systematic review of instruments measuring patients′ perceptions of patient-centred nursing care. Nurs Inq. 2015; 22(2): 106–120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12078
Suhonen R, Leino-Kilpi H, Välimäki M. Development and psychometric properties of the
Individualized Care Scale. J Eval Clin Pract. 2005; 11(1): 7–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2003.00481.x
Frampton S, Guastello S, Brady C, Hale M, Sheryl H, Smith S, et al. Patient-Centered Care. Improvement Guide. Derby, CT, Camden, ME: Planetree, Inc. Planetree, Inc. and Picker Institute; 2009. p. 247.
Polit D, Beck C. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Tenth edit. Wolters Kluwer, editor. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2017. 1164 p.
Köberich S, Suhonen R, Feuchtinger J, Farin E. The German version of the individualized care scale - Assessing validity and reliability. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015; 9: 483–494. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s77486
Rodríguez-Martín B, Martin-Martin R, Suhonen R. Individualized Care Scale-patient: A Spanish validation study. Nurs Ethics. 2019; 26(6): 1791–804. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733018769351
Amaral A. Translation and Validation of the Individualized Care Scale. Int J Caring Sci. 2014; 7(1):90.
Petroz U, Kennedy D, Webster F, Nowak A. Patients’ Perceptions of Individualized Care: Evaluating Psychometric Properties and Results of the Individualized Care Scale. Can J Nurs Res CJNR. 2011; 43(2): 80–100.
Suhonen R, Berg A, Idvall E, Kalafati M, Katajisto J, Land L, et al. Adapting the Individualized Care Scale for cross-cultural comparison. Scand J Caring Sci. 2010; 24(2): 392–403. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2009.00712.x
Ruiz A, Gómez C. Epidemiología clínica, Investigación Clínica aplicada. 2da Edición. Bogotá: Panamericana E médica, editor; 2015. 625 p. 12. Tornimbeni S, Pérez E, Olaz F. Introducción a la psicometría. 1ra Edición. Buenos Aires: Editorial Paidos; 2008. 288 p.
García Cabrero B. Manual de métodos de investigación para las ciencias sociales. Un enfoque de enseñanza basado en proyectos. 1ra edición. Moderno EM, editor. México DF: UNAM; 2009. 182 p.
Escurra L. Cuantificación de la validez de contenido por criterio de jueces. Rev Psicol. 1988; 6(1–2): 103–111. doi: https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.198801-02.008
Pedrosa I, Suárez Álvarez J, García Cueto E. Evidencias sobre la validez de contenido: avances teóricos y métodos para su estimación. Acción Psicol. 2013; 10(2): 4–11.
Lloret-Segura S, Ferreres-Traver A, Hernández-Baeza A, Tomás-Marco I. El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada Introducción Determinación de la adecuación del Análisis. An Psicol. 2014; 30(3): 1151–1169. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361
Suhonen R, Välimäki M, Leino-Kilpi H, Katajisto J. Testing the individualized care model. Scand J Caring Sci. 2004; 18(1): 27–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00255.x
Suhonen R, Välimäki M, Katajisto J. Individualized care in a finnish healthcare organization. J Clin Nurs. 2000; 9(2): 218–227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2000.00362.x
Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011; 2: 53–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.5116%2Fijme.4dfb.8dfd
Hernández Sampieri R, Fernández Collado C, Baptista Lucio P. Metodología de la investigación. Sexta. México D.F: Mcgraw-Hill / Interamericana Editores SADC., editor; 2014. 600 p.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Nancy Viviana Torres-Díaz, Bairon Steve Peña-Alfaro