Effects of neuromuscular taping as an independent or complementary method to physiotherapeutic treatment in the management of cervical pain
pdf (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

Keywords

Neck pain
kinesiology
joints
motion
muscle strength
physical therapy modalities

How to Cite

Villota-Chicaíza, X. M., & Fernández-Niño, J. A. (2018). Effects of neuromuscular taping as an independent or complementary method to physiotherapeutic treatment in the management of cervical pain. Salud UIS, 50(3), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.18273/revsal.v50n3-2018001

Abstract

 

 Introduction: Neck pain is one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal pathologies. There is, however, no evidence of the effectiveness of neuromuscular taping versus physiotherapy, or of their combined therapy. Objectives: To analyze: the effects of taping compared with those of a physiotherapy program; and the additional benefits that could be obtained if these two therapies were combined in the management of neck pain. Methodology: A total of 60 patients diagnosed with cervical pain were selected and a quasi-experimental pre-post parallel, four-arm simple blind design was utilized: physiotherapy alone; taping alone; physiotherapy plus taping; and taping plus physiotherapy. The effects were estimated, using fixed effects models, for pain at rest, on palpation and in movement. Results: The greatest intra-individual change was found with physiotherapy (β=−1.81; CI95%: −2.69 to −0.93), followed by the physiotherapy plus taping (β=−1.57; CI95%: −2.32 to −0.83), then taping plus physiotherapy (β=−1.29; CI95%: −1.98 to −0.60). Taping alone, however, achieved only a marginally significant reduction (β=−0.50; CI95%: −1.11 to 0.10). Regarding palpation pain, a statistically significant reduction was only observed for physiotherapy (β=−0.84; CI95%: −1.56 to −0.11) and physiotherapy plus taping (β=−0.52; CI95%: −1.09 to 0.04). Finally, for movement pain, a statistically significant reduction for physiotherapy was observed (β=−1.28; CI95%: −2.02 to −0.55) and very similar reductions were observed for physiotherapy plus taping and taping plus physiotherapy. Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, physiotherapy would be the most effective treatment for cervical pain.

https://doi.org/10.18273/revsal.v50n3-2018001
pdf (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

References

1. Fernandez de las Peñas C. Cleland J, Huiibregts P. Síndromes dolorosos en el cuello y en el miembro superior. 1ed. Spain: Elsevier; 2013.

2. Cañete JD, Gómez JJ, Gonzalez MA, Herrero G, Morillos L, Pablos JL, et al. Manual SER de las enfermedades reumáticas, Sociedad española de reumatología. 6thed. Madrid: Elsevier; 2014.

3. Gonzalez J, Fernandez de las Peñas C, Cleland JA, Huijbregts P, del Rosario Gutierrez M. Shortterm effects of cervical kinesio taping on pain and cervical range of motion in patients with acute whiplash injury: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009; 39(7): 515-521. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.3072.

4. Saavedra M, Castro AM, Arroyo M, Cleland JA, Lara IC, Fernandez de las PC. Short-term effects of kinesio taping versus cervical thrust manipulation in patients with mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012; 42(8): 724-730. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.4086.

5. Dawood RS, Kattabei OM, Nasef SA, Battarjee KA, Abdelraouf OR. Effectiveness of kinesio taping versus cervical traction on mechanical neck dysfunction. IJTRR.2013; 2 (2): 1-8. doi: 10.5455/ijtrr.00000019.

6. Kılın HE, Harput G, Baltacı G. Additional effects of kinesiotaping to mobilization techniques in chronic mechanical neck pain. Turk J Physiother Rehabil. 2015; 26(3): 107-113. doi: 10.7603/s40680-015-0017-1.

7. Aguirre T. Kinesiology Taping. Teoría y Práctica. 1ra ed. Spain: Biocorp Europa; 2010.

8. Dueñas L, Balasch M, Espí G. Técnicas y nuevas aplicaciones del vendaje neuromuscular. Spain: Lettera Publicaciones; 2011.

9. Selva F. Vendaje Neuromuscular manual de aplicaciones práctica. 3rd ed: Physi-rehabkineterapy-eivissa; 2015.

10. O’Riordan C, Clifford A, Van De Ven P, Nelson J. Chronic neck pain and exercise interventions: frequency, intensity, time, and type principle. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95(4):770-783. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.015.

11. Asmaa M, El-Bandrawy, Hassan O. Ghareeb. Efficacy of neck stabilization exercises for neck pain complicating pregnancy. IJTRR 2016; 5(5): 122-128. doi: 10.5455/ijtrr.000000193.

12. Campbell DT, Stanley JC. Experimental and quasiexperimental designs for research. 1ed. Ravenio Books; 2015.

13. Adler SS, Beckers D, Bucks M. La facilitación neuromuscular propioceptiva en la práctica. 2ed. Philadelphia: Panamericana; 2000.

14. Rodríguez MJ. Valoración y manejo del dolor. 3ed. Madrid: Aran ediciones; 2006.

15. González R. Rehabilitación Médica. Barcelona: Masson S.A.; 1997.

16. Hislop HJ, Montgomery J. Pruebas funcionales musculares. 6th ed. Madrid. Marban Libros S.l. 1999.

17. Bartels B. Beyond “Fixed Versus Random Effects”: a framework for improving substantive and statistical analysis of panel, time-series crosssectional, and multilevel data”. Faculty Poster Session, Political Methodology Conference, Ann Arbor, MI, July 9-12, 2008.

18. Resolución Nº 008430 DE 1993. República de Colombia, Ministerio de Salud. (Octuber 4, 1993).

19. Manzini JL. Declaración de Helsinki: Principios éticos para la investigación médica sobre sujetos humanos. Act Bioethica 2000.

20. Noormohammadpour P, Mansournia MA, Koohpayehzadeh J, Asgari F, Rostami M, Rafei A, et al. Prevalence of chronic neck pain, low back pain, and knee pain and their related factors in community-dwelling adults in Iran: a population based national study. Clin J Pain. 2017; 33(2): 181-187. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000396.

21. Organización Internacional del Trabajo OIT. Actualización de la Clasificación Internacional Uniforme de Ocupaciones (CIUO). Geneva 2007. 67p.

22. Ambusam S, Baharudin O, Roslizawati N, Leonard J. Position of document holder and work related risk factors for neck pain among computer users: a narrative review. Clin Ter. 2015; 166(6): 256-261. doi: 10.7417/CT.2015.1898.

23. Gremark Simonsen J, Axmon A, Nordander C, Arvidsson I. Neck and upper extremity pain in sonographers - Associations with occupational factors. Appl Ergon. 2017; 58: 245-253. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.06.019.

24. Yang H, Haldeman S, Nakata A, Choi B, Delp L, Baker D. Work-related risk factors for neck pain in the US working population. Spine (Phila PA 1976). 2015; 40(3) : 184-192. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000700.

25. Dusunceli Y, Ozturk C, Atamaz F, Hepguler S, Durmaz B. Efficacy of neck stabilization exercises for neck pain: a randomized controlled study. J Rehabil Med. 2009; 41(8): 626-631. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0392.

26. Antúnez L, Almeida M, Roldán J, Manzanoa A, Valero R, Serrano C. Eficacia ante el dolor y la discapacidad cervical de un programa de fisioterapia individual frente a uno colectivo en la cervicalgia mecánica aguda y subaguda. Aten Primaria. 2017; 49(7): 417-425. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2016.09.010.

27. Bahar K, Bakar Y, Zübeyir S. Investigation of the efficacy of different physiotherapy methods for neck pain. journal of musculoskeletal pain, 2012; 20(4): 284-291. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/10582452.2012.733802.

28. Sanjay KP, Babu VK, Kumar SN, Kadam VV. Short term efficacy of kinesiotaping and exercises on chronic mechanical neck pain. Int J Physiother Res. 2013; 1(5): 283-292.

29. Vigil Y. Condiciones de trabajo y enfermedades ocupacionales de los conductores de transporte público urbano de Lima Metropolitana. Rev Ciencias Empresar. 2013; 4(2): 52-69.

30. Domínguez AM. Identificación de los peligros y valoración de los riesgos, de las vibraciones transmitidas al cuerpo entero, en los colaboradores de empresas del sector de la construcción de Santiago de Cali: Universidad Autónoma de Occidente; 2013.

Se autoriza la reproducción total o parcial de la obra para fines educativos, siempre y cuando se cite la fuente.  

 

Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Pública Internacional.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.