Resumen
La medición cuantitativa de drogas ilícitas en aguas residuales puede proporcionar información objetiva sobre los patrones y tendencias del uso de psicotrópicos en la comunidad. Se analizó la presencia de psicoactivos en plantas de tratamiento para aguas residuales y en el medio ambiente por epidemiología de alcantarillado, mediante una revisión sistemática de 2008-2017 por medio de los descriptores controlados: “drogas ilícitas”, “plantas de tratamiento de aguas residuales” y “ambiente” hecha en las bases de datos Medline vía PubMed, SciELO, BVS vía LILACS y Google Académico. La búsqueda arrojó 439 estudios y fueron seleccionados 34 estudios para análisis. Los años de publicación variaron, siendo 2016 el de mayor de publicaciones (diez), seguido de 2014 y 2012 (cinco), 2017, 2013, 2010 (tres), 2011 (dos), 2015, 2009 y 2008 (uno cada uno). Los resultados mostraron la presencia de indicadores químicos de las drogas clásicas cocaína y cannabis. La investigación sobre la presencia de drogas ilícitas, particularmente como compuestos activos en el medio ambiente, es vital para mejorar el conocimiento de los tipos consumidos, su prevalencia; siendo capaz desplegar para analizar la exposición y el impacto de estos compuestos en el medio ambiente y la salud pública. Los resultados de esta revisión han resaltado que la epidemiología basada en aguas residuales es un enfoque útil y poderoso.
Referencias
2. Hebdige D. The Subcultural Meaning of Style. Londres: Routledge; 2002.
3. Petrie B, Barden R, Kasprzyk-Hordern B. A review on emerging contaminants in wastewaters and the environment: Current knowledge, understudied areas and recommendations for future monitoring. Water Res. 2015; 72: 3-27. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.053.
4. Rosi-Marshall EJ, Snow D, Bartelt-Hunt SL, Paspalof A, Tank JL. A review of ecological effects and environmental fate of illicit drugs in aquatic ecosystems. J Hazard Mater. 2015; 282: 18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.06.062.
5. Pal R, Megharaj M, Kirkbride KP, Naidu R. Illicit drugs and the environment - A review. Sci Total Environ. 2013; 463-464: 1079-1092. doi: 0.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.086.
6. Moore LD, Elkavich A. Who’s using and who’s doing time: incarceration, the war on drugs, and public health. Am J Public Health. 2008; 98(5): 782-786. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.126284.
7. Whiteford HA, Degenhardt L, Rehm J, Baxter AJ, Ferrari AJ, Erskine HE, et al. Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet. 2013; 382(9904): 1575-1586. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61611-6.
8. Jimenez Herrera L. Prevention against drugs. Rev Costarric Salud Públ. 2010; 19(2): 93-100.
9. González-López JR, Rodríguez-Gázquez MA, Lomas-Campos MM. Prevalencia de consumo de alcohol, tabaco y drogas ilícitas en inmigrantes latinoamericanos adultos. Rev Latino-Americana Enferm. 2012; 20(3): 528-535. doi: 10.1590/S0104-11692012000300014.
10. Córdoba D, Toledo D. Cocaína y base de cocaína. Basuco. En: Córdoba D. Bogotá “Toxicología”. Bogotá: ed Editorial El Manual Moderno; 2001.
11. Ribeiro M, Marques ACPR, Laranjeira R, Alves HNP, Araújo MR, Baltieri DA, et al. Abuso e dependência da maconha. Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. 2005; 51(5): 247-249. doi: 10.1590/S0104-42302005000500008.
12. Ballani TSL, Oliveira MLF. Use of drugs of abuse and sentinel event: constructing a proposition about assessing public policies. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2007; 16(3): 488-494. doi: 10.1590/S0104-07072007000300015.
13. Bernal E. ¿Tienen futuro las guías de práctica clínica en el Sistema Nacional de Salud? Gestión Clín Sanit. 2002; 4(3): 75-77.
14. Sanchez Z, Oliveira LG, Nappo SA. Main reasons for non-use of illicit drugs by young population exposed to risk situations. Rev Saude Publica. 2005;39(4):1-7. doi: 10.1590/S0034-89102005000400013.
15. Caiaffa WT, Bastos FI, Freitas LL, Mingoti SA, Proietti FA, Carneiro-Proietti AB, et al. The contribution of two Brazilian multi-center studies to the assessment of HIV and HCV infection and prevention strategies among injecting drug users: The Ajude-Brasil I and II Projects. Cad Saude Publica. 2006; 22(4): 771-782. doi: 10.1590/S0102-311X2006000400016.
16. Alves VS. Health care models for users of alcohol and other drugs: political discourse, knowledge and practices. Cad Saude Publica. 2009; 25(11): 2309-2319. doi: 10.1590/S0102-311X2009001100002.
17. Zuccato E, Chiabrando C, Castiglioni S, Calamari D, Bagnati R, Schiarea S, et al. Cocaine in surface water: a new evidence based tool to monitor community drug abuse. Environ. Health: A Global Access Science Source. 2005; 4:14. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-4-14.
18. Zuccato E, Chiabrando C, Castigliano S, Bagnati R, Fanelli R. Estimating community drug abuse by wastewater analysis. Environ. Health Perspect. 2008; 116(8): 1027-1032. doi. 10.1289/ehp.11022.
19. Zuccato E, Castiglioni S, Bagnati R, Chiabrando C, Grassi P, Fanelli R. Illicit drugs, a novel group of environmental contaminants. Water Res. 2008; 42(4-5): 961-868. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.09.010.
20. Gil MJ, Soto AM, Usma JI, Gutiérrez OD. Contaminantes emergentes en aguas, efectos y posibles tratamientos. Producc Limpia. 2012; 7(2): 52-73.
21. Tejada C, Quiñonez E, Peña M. Contaminantes emergentes en aguas: metabolitos de fármacos. una revisión. Rev Fac Cienc Básicas. 2014; 10(1): 80-101.
22. Castiglioni S, Thomas KV, Kasprzyk-Hordern B, Vandam L, Griffiths P. Testing wastewater to detect illicit drugs: State of the art, potential and research needs. Sci Total Environ. 2014; 487: 613-620. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.034.
23. Castiglioni S, Bijlsma L, Covaci A, Emke E, Hernández F, Reid M, et al. Evaluation of uncertainties associated with the determination of community drug use through the measurement of sewage drug biomarkers. Environ Sci Technol. 2013; 47(3): 1452-1460. doi: 10.1021/es302722f.
24. EMCDDA. Assessing illicit drugs in wastewater: advances in wastewater-based drug epidemiology. EMCDDA Insights 22. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2016. doi: 10.2810/017397.
25. Sampaio RF, Mancini MC. Estudos de revisão sistemática: um guia para síntese criteriosa da evidência científica. Braz J Phys Ther. 2007; 11(1): 83-89. doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552007000100013.
26. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6: e1000097.
27. Sodré FF, Souza GB, Feitosa RS, Pereira CEB, Maldaner AO. Illicit Drugs, Metabolites and adulterants in wastewater: monitoring community drug abuse in the Brazilian Federal District during the 2014 Soccer World Cup. J Braz Chem Soc. 2017; 28(11): 2146-2154. doi: 10.21577/0103-5053.20170063.
28. Thiebault T, Fougère L, Destandau E, Réty M, Jacob J. Temporal dynamics of human-excreted pollutants in wastewater treatment plant influents: Toward a better knowledge of mass load fluctuations. Sci Total Environ. 2017; 596-597: 246-255. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.130.
29. Zuccato E, Gracia-Lor E, Rousis NI, Parabiaghi A, Senta I, Riva F, Castiglioni S. Illicit drug consumption in school populations measured by wastewater analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017; 178: 285-290. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.030.
30. Banta-Green CJ, Brewer AJ, Ort C, Helsel DR, Williams JR, Field JA. Using wastewater-based epidemiology to estimate drug consumption-Statistical analyses and data presentation. Sci Total Environ. 2016; 568: 856-863. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.052.
31. Baz-Lomba JA, Salvatore S, Gracia-Lor E, Bade R, Castiglioni S, Castrignanò E, et al. Comparison of pharmaceutical, illicit drug, alcohol, nicotine and caffeine levels in wastewater with sale, seizure and consumption data for 8 European cities. BMC Public Health. 2016; 16(1): 1035. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3686-5.
32. Been F, Bijlsma L, Benaglia L, Berset JD, Botero-Coy AM, Castiglioni S, et al. Assessing geographical differences in illicit drug consumption -A comparison of results from epidemiological and wastewater data in Germany and Switzerland. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016; 161: 189-199. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.02.002.
33. Bijlsma L, Botero-Coy AM, Rincón RJ, Peñuela GA, Hernández F. Estimation of illicit drug use in the main cities of Colombia by means of urban wastewater analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2016; 565: 984-993. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.078.
34. Bodík I, Mackuľak T, Fáberová M, Ivanová L. Occurrence of illicit drugs and selected pharmaceuticals in Slovak municipal wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016; 23(20): 21098-21105. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7415-5.
35. Castiglioni S, Borsotti A, Riva F, Zuccato E. Illicit drug consumption estimated by wastewater analysis in different districts of Milan: A case study. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2016; 35(2): 128-132. doi: 10.1111/dar.12233.
36. Gatidou G, Kinyua J, van Nuijs AL, Gracia-Lor E, Castiglioni S, Covaci A, et al. Drugs of abuse and alcohol consumption among different groups of population on the Greek Island of Lesvos through sewage-based epidemiology. Sci Total Environ. 2016;563-564:633-640. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.130.
37. Klupczynska A, Dereziński P, Krysztofiak J, Kokot ZJ. Estimation of drug abuse in 9 Polish cities by wastewater analysis. Forensic Sci Int. 2016; 260: 14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.12.042.
38. Krizman I, Senta I, Ahel M, Terzic S. Wastewater-based assessment of regional and temporal consumption patterns of illicit drugs and therapeutic opioids in Croatia. Sci Total Environ. 2016; 566-567: 454-462. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.075.
39. Tscharke BJ, Chen C, Gerber JP, White JM. Temporal trends in drug use in Adelaide, South Australia by wastewater analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2016; 565: 384-391. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.183.
40. Kim KY, Lai FY, Kim HY, Thai PK, Mueller JF, Oh JE. The first application of wastewater-based drug epidemiology in five South Korean cities. Sci Total Environ. 2015; 524-525: 440-446. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.065.
41. Damien DA, Thomas N, Hélène P, Sara K, Yves L. First evaluation of illicit and licit drug consumption based on wastewater analysis in Fort de France urban area (Martinique, Caribbean), a transit area for drug smuggling. Sci Total Environ. 2014; 490: 970-978. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.090.
42. Frías-Chicharro A, González-Alonso S, Montero-Rubio JC, Valcárcel-Rivera Y. Estimación del consumo de drogas de abuso y sus metabolitos a partir de su presencia en el agua residual de Talavera de la Reina y en el río Tajo. Rev Esp Salud Publ. 2014; 88(2): 289-299. doi: 10.4321/S1135-57272014000200011.
43. Kankaanpää A, Ariniemi K, Heinonen M, Kuoppasalmi K, Gunnar T. Use of illicit stimulant drugs in Finland: a wastewater study in ten major cities. Sci Total Environ. 2014; 487: 696-702. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.095.
44. Mackuľak T, Skubák J, Grabic R, Ryba J, Birošová L, Fedorova G, et al. National study of illicit drug use in Slovakia based on wastewater analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2014; 494-495: 158-165. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.089.
45. Yargeau V, Taylor B, Li H, Rodayan A, Metcalfe CD. Analysis of drugs of abuse in wastewater from two Canadian cities. Sci Total Environ. 2014; 487: 722-730. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.094.
46. Lai FY, Bruno R, Hall W, Gartner C, Ort C, Kirkbride P, et al. Profiles of illicit drug use during annual key holiday and control periods in Australia: wastewater analysis in an urban, a semi-rural and a vacation area. Addiction. 2013; 108(3): 556-565. doi: 10.1111/add.12006.
47. Lai FY, Thai PK, O'Brien J, Gartner C, Bruno R, Kele B, et al. Using quantitative wastewater analysis to measure daily usage of conventional and emerging illicit drugs at an annual music festival. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2013; 32(6): 594-602. doi: 10.1111/dar.12061.
48. Nefau T, Karolak S, Castillo L, Boireau V, Levi Y. Presence of illicit drugs and metabolites in influents and effluents of 25 sewage water treatment plants and map of drug consumption in France. Sci Total Environ. 2013; 461-462: 712-722. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.038.
49. Baker DR, Očenášková V, Kvicalova M, Kasprzyk-Hordern B. Drugs of abuse in wastewater and suspended particulate matter - further developments in sewage epidemiology. Environ Int. 2012; 48: 28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2012.06.014.
50. Bijlsma L, Emke E, Hernández F, de Voogt P. Investigation of drugs of abuse and relevant metabolites in Dutch sewage water by liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry. Chemosphere. 2012; 89(11): 1399-1406. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.110.
51. González-Mariño I, Quintana JB, Rodríguez I, González-Díez M, Cela R. Screening and selective quantification of illicit drugs in wastewater by mixed-mode solid-phase extraction and quadrupole-time-of-flight liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2012; 84(3): 1708-1717. doi: 10.1021/ac202989e.
52. Maldaner AO, Schmidt LL, Locatelli MAF, Jardim WF, Sodré FF, Almeida FV, et al. Estimating cocaine consumption in the Brazilian Federal District (FD) by sewage analysis. Braz Chem Soc. 2012; 23(5), 861-867. doi: 10.1590/S0103-50532012000500011.
53. Thomas KV, Bijlsma L, Castiglioni S, Covaci A, Emke E, Grabic R, et al. Comparing illicit drug use in 19 European cities through sewage analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2012; 432: 432-439. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.069.
54. Irvine RJ, Kostakis C, Felgate PD, Jaehne EJ, Chen C, White JM. Population drug use in Australia: a wastewater analysis. Forensic Sci Int. 2011; 210(1-3): 69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.01.037.
55. van Nuijs AL, Mougel JF, Tarcomnicu I, Bervoets L, Blust R, Jorens PG, et al. Sewage epidemiology - a real-time approach to estimate the consumption of illicit drugs in Brussels, Belgium. Environ Int. 2011; 37(3): 612-621. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2010.12.006.
56. Karolak S, Nefau T, Bailly E, Solgadi A, Levi Y. Estimation of illicit drugs consumption by wastewater analysis in Paris area (France). Forensic Sci Int. 2010; 200(1-3): 153-160. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.04.007.
57. Metcalfe C, Tindale K, Li H, Rodayan A, Yargeau V. Illicit drugs in Canadian municipal wastewater and estimates of community drug use. Environ Pollut. 2010; 158(10): 3179-3185. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.07.002.
58. Terzic S, Senta I, Ahel M. Illicit drugs in wastewater of the city of Zagreb (Croatia) - estimation of drug abuse in a transition country. Environ Pollut. 2010; 158(8): 2686-2693. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.04.020.
59. Postigo C, López de Alda MJ, Barceló D. Drugs of abuse and their metabolites in the Ebro River basin: occurrence in sewage and surface water, sewage treatment plants removal efficiency, and collective drug usage estimation. Environ Int. 2009; 36(1): 75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2009.10.004.
60. Viana M, Querol X, Alastuey A, Postigo C, de Alda MJ, Barceló D, et al. Drugs of abuse in airborne particulates in urban environments. Environ Int. 2010; 36(6): 527-534. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2010.04.004.
61. Robles-Molina J, Gilbert-López B, García-Reyes JF, Molina-Díaz A. Monitoring of selected priority and emerging contaminants in the Guadalquivir River and other related surface waters in the province of Jaén, South East Spain. Sci Total Environ. 2014; (479-480): 247-257. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.121.
62. Jiang JJ, Lee CL, Fang MD, Tu BW, Liang YJ. Impacts of Emerging Contaminants on surrounding aquatic environment from a youth festival. Environ Sci Technol. 2015; 49(2): 792-799. doi: 10.1021/es503944e.
63. Catalá M, Domínguez-Morueco N, Migens A, Molina R, Martínez F, Valcárcel Y, et al. Elimination of drugs of abuse and their toxicity from natural waters by photo-Fenton treatment. Sci Total Environ. 2015; 520: 198-205. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.042.
64. Laranjeira R. Legalização de drogas e a saúde pública. Ciênc. saúde coletiva. 2010; 15(3): 621-631. doi: 10.1590/S1413-81232010000300002.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.