Abstract
Introduction: The evaluation of the educational environment in medicine provides guidelines for restructuring curricular changes aimed to achieve at achieving a better performance of the student and future professional. In the present study were involved 490 medical students from the Universidad Industrial de Santander. Objetive: To measure the educational environment with the DREEM survey (50 questions about five aspects: perception of learning, perception of teachers, academic self-perception, perception of the environment and social self-perception). We decided to use the DREEM because it’s being the most common survey to gauge the quality of medical education. We found an important diminution in the positive perception of teachers, throughout with the pass of the years of n the medical school; About academic self-perception and learning perception the lowest values were found at the third and sixth year of medical school. Finally the most common activities that medical students kept doing during the years of medical career were the religious and musical activities.
References
2. Prideaux D. The global-local tension in medical education: turning ‘think global, act local’ on its head? Med Educ. 2018 (in press). doi: 10.1111/medu.13630.
3. Quintero GA. Medical education and the healthcare system - why does the curriculum need to be reformed? BMC Medicine. 2014; 12: 213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0213-3.
4. Comisión para la Transformación de la Educación Médica en Colombia. Documento de recomendaciones para la transformación de la educación médica en Colombia. Bogotá DC:
Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social / Ministerio de Educación; 2017.
5. Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Medicina (Ascofame). Consenso de Montería.
6. Dent John-Harden Ronal. A Practical Guide for medical teachers. Fourth edition; 2013. Elsevier.
7. Aguilar-Barojas S, Jiménez-Sastré A, Castillo-Orueta ML. Validación de la traducción al idioma español del Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure. Invest Educ Med; 2017 (in press). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.riem.2017.03.001.
8. Riquelme A, Oporto M, Oporto J, Méndez JI, Viviani P, Salech F, et al. Measuring students´ perceptions of the educational climate of the new curriculum at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile: Performance of the Spanish translation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). Educ Health (Abingdon). 2009; 22(1): 112.
9. Thompson EC, Juan Z. Comparative cultural salience: measures using free-list data. Field Methods. 2006; 18: 398-412. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525822X0101300303.
10. Smith JJ. Using ANTHROPAC 3.5 and a spreadsheet to compute a free-list salience index. Field Methods. 1993; 5(3): 1-3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X9300500301.
11. Domínguez LC, Vega NV, Espitia EL, Sanabria ÁE, Corso C, Serna AM, et al. Impacto de la estrategia de aula invertida en el ambiente de aprendizaje en cirugía: una comparación con la clase magistral. Biomedica. 2015; 35(4): 513-521. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.v35i4.2640.
12. Shankar PR, Dubey AK, Balasubramanium R. Students´perception of the learning environment at Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2013; 10(8): 1-5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2013.10.8.
13. Hyunho K, Hanyoung J, Pyeongjin J, Seungju K, Young-Bae P, Yeonseok K. Perception study of traditional korean medical students on the medical education using the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure. Evidence-Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016; 6042967: 1-5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6042967.
14. Morales Gómez A, Medina Figueroa AM. Percepción del alumno de pregrado de Medicina, acerca del ambiente educativo. Rev Med Inst Seguro Soc. 2007; 45(2): 123-131.
15. Ortega Javier, Pérez C, Ortiz L, Fasce E, McColl P, Torres G, et al. Estructura factorial de la escala DREEM en estudiantes de medicina Chilenos. Rev Med Chile. 2015; 143(5): 651-657. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872015000500013.
16. Ríos González CM. Percepción del ambiente educativo en estudiantes de Medicina de Latinoamérica, 2015. CIMEL. 2016; 21(2): 38-41.
Se autoriza la reproducción total o parcial de la obra para fines educativos, siempre y cuando se cite la fuente.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Pública Internacional.